Author Topic: Sondland, Trump's appointee, changes testimony to say there was clear quid pro quo  (Read 1216 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Cyber Liberty

  • Coffee! Donuts! Kittens!
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 80,593
  • Gender: Male
  • 🌵🌵🌵
There seems to be a debate on what constitutes a "Quid Pro Quo," or if it's illegal (or even unethical).  Anti-Trump has one view, Pro-Trump has another while everybody in neither camp has no idea.
For unvaccinated, we are looking at a winter of severe illness and death — if you’re unvaccinated — for themselves, their families, and the hospitals they’ll soon overwhelm. Sloe Joe Biteme 12/16
I will NOT comply.
 
Castillo del Cyber Autonomous Zone ~~~~~>                          :dontfeed:

Offline Cyber Liberty

  • Coffee! Donuts! Kittens!
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 80,593
  • Gender: Male
  • 🌵🌵🌵
Steven Hassan author of The Cult of Trump: A Leading Cult Expert Explains How the President Uses Mind Control says that is why people stay in cults.  Nobody wants to admit to themselves they were conned.

That is equally true for the Anti-Trump partisans.  I don't care for the "cult" label, but there is a lot of fervor out at both ends of the partisan spectrum.
For unvaccinated, we are looking at a winter of severe illness and death — if you’re unvaccinated — for themselves, their families, and the hospitals they’ll soon overwhelm. Sloe Joe Biteme 12/16
I will NOT comply.
 
Castillo del Cyber Autonomous Zone ~~~~~>                          :dontfeed:

Offline skeeter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26,717
  • Gender: Male
Of course, the President's CoS Mick Mulvaney already admitted it for awhile.
Agreed.


https://www.usaid.gov/sites/default/files/documents/1868/200mbo.pdf

Turns out your definition of 'quid pro quo' just might be official US policy.

Who knew?

Offline Wingnut

  • That is the problem with everything. They try and make it better without realizing the old is fine.
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26,839
  • Gender: Male
There seems to be a debate on what constitutes a "Quid Pro Quo," or if it's illegal (or even unethical).  Anti-Trump has one view, Pro-Trump has another while everybody in neither camp has no idea.

They don't call it "The Dead Language" for nutin.  Know one knows what it means!  ;)

I am just a Technicolor Dream Cat riding this kaleidoscope of life.

Offline Cyber Liberty

  • Coffee! Donuts! Kittens!
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 80,593
  • Gender: Male
  • 🌵🌵🌵
Isn't insuring a recipient country is taking measures to combat corruption a legal requirement of granting that US aid?

I'm pretty sure it is, for countries who have a Treaty with the US, agreeing to participate in criminal investigations.  Like Ukraine.
For unvaccinated, we are looking at a winter of severe illness and death — if you’re unvaccinated — for themselves, their families, and the hospitals they’ll soon overwhelm. Sloe Joe Biteme 12/16
I will NOT comply.
 
Castillo del Cyber Autonomous Zone ~~~~~>                          :dontfeed:

Offline Hoodat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 37,285
If a political party does not have its foundation in the determination to advance a cause that is right and that is moral, then it is not a political party; it is merely a conspiracy to seize power.     -Dwight Eisenhower-

"The [U.S.] Constitution is a limitation on the government, not on private individuals ... it does not prescribe the conduct of private individuals, only the conduct of the government ... it is not a charter for government power, but a charter of the citizen's protection against the government."     -Ayn Rand-

Offline skeeter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26,717
  • Gender: Male
I'm pretty sure it is, for countries who have a Treaty with the US, agreeing to participate in criminal investigations.  Like Ukraine.

Well if THATS the case then

"fire the prosecutor currently investigating my son's company or we'll sh*tcan your loan guarantees" would be an actual quid pro quo;

while "we'll send you that aid, by the way we'd appreciate it if you'd also investigate these instance of possible corruption involving US officials" - would be mandated by law.

Does that sound right?



« Last Edit: November 05, 2019, 09:20:01 pm by skeeter »

Offline DB

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13,598
Dems say that demanding investigations is just a simple search for the truth based on the seriousness of the charge. That if there's nothing to hide the investigation will find nothing.

Why doesn't that apply to Trump demanding an investigation based on evidence that came out of Biden's own mouth involving the previous Ukraine prosecutor being fired for searching for the truth?


Offline Cyber Liberty

  • Coffee! Donuts! Kittens!
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 80,593
  • Gender: Male
  • 🌵🌵🌵
Well if THATS the case then

"fire the prosecutor currently investigating my son's company or we'll sh*tcan your loan guarantees" would be an actual quid pro quo;

while "we'll send you that aid, by the way we'd appreciate it if you'd also investigate these instance of possible corruption involving US officials" - would be mandated by law.

Does that sound right?

I would say that first one is a bit more than a Quid Pro Quo.  What Biden has confessed already to doing sounds more like Extortion, straight up.  And a QPQ could be mandated by law, like in a lease for an apartment:  "If you give us rent money, you can live on the premises."
For unvaccinated, we are looking at a winter of severe illness and death — if you’re unvaccinated — for themselves, their families, and the hospitals they’ll soon overwhelm. Sloe Joe Biteme 12/16
I will NOT comply.
 
Castillo del Cyber Autonomous Zone ~~~~~>                          :dontfeed:

Offline 240B

  • Lord of all things Orange!
  • TBR Advisory Committee
  • ***
  • Posts: 26,592
    • I try my best ...
Trump predicted that Schitthead would change the transcripts and coach testimony until he gets what he wants.
This is not a real trial. It was never meant to be. It is not a real impeachment. It is just a delaying tactic to harass Trump until the election with the additional benefit of taking pressure off of Biden, Hunter, Obama, and Hillary, by muddying the water and causing confusion.
Everything and anything that comes from Schittface and his circus certainly cannot be trusted.
You cannot "COEXIST" with people who want to kill you.
If they kill their own with no conscience, there is nothing to stop them from killing you.
Rational fear and anger at vicious murderous Islamic terrorists is the same as irrational antisemitism, according to the Leftists.

Offline Formerly Once-Ler

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 0

https://www.usaid.gov/sites/default/files/documents/1868/200mbo.pdf

Turns out your definition of 'quid pro quo' just might be official US policy.

Who knew?

@skeeter
That's 35 page document.  Why are you sending me homework? 

I'm human scum happy77
I ain't gonna read that.  If million dollar Trump donor Sondland says it was a quid pro quo, I take him at his word.  I'll let the House decide if it's impeachable.

Offline truth_seeker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 28,386
  • Gender: Male
  • Common Sense Results Oriented Conservative Veteran
There seems to be a debate on what constitutes a "Quid Pro Quo," or if it's illegal (or even unethical).  Anti-Trump has one view, Pro-Trump has another while everybody in neither camp has no idea.
Actually above anybody else, the President's job is arranging Quid Pro Quos,

....however the UNELECTED bureacracy is pressing that is their job.

"God must love the common man, he made so many of them.�  Abe Lincoln

Offline Formerly Once-Ler

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 0
Actually above anybody else, the President's job is arranging Quid Pro Quos,

@truth_seeker
It's bizarre how Trump keeps saying "no quid pro quo" then.  Does he not know his job?

Offline Cyber Liberty

  • Coffee! Donuts! Kittens!
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 80,593
  • Gender: Male
  • 🌵🌵🌵
@truth_seeker
It's bizarre how Trump keeps saying "no quid pro quo" then.  Does he not know his job?

He doesn't know what definition the people questioning him are using.
For unvaccinated, we are looking at a winter of severe illness and death — if you’re unvaccinated — for themselves, their families, and the hospitals they’ll soon overwhelm. Sloe Joe Biteme 12/16
I will NOT comply.
 
Castillo del Cyber Autonomous Zone ~~~~~>                          :dontfeed:

Offline XenaLee

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15,398
  • Gender: Female
  • Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum
There seems to be a debate on what constitutes a "Quid Pro Quo," or if it's illegal (or even unethical).  Anti-Trump has one view, Pro-Trump has another while everybody in neither camp has no idea.

And isn't there a treaty that solidifies cooperation re: investigating corruption between the two nations that makes all of this quid pro quo stuff ....

pure BS...?
No quarter given to the enemy within...ever.

You can vote your way into socialism, but you have to shoot your way out of it.

Offline Cyber Liberty

  • Coffee! Donuts! Kittens!
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 80,593
  • Gender: Male
  • 🌵🌵🌵
And isn't there a treaty that solidifies cooperation re: investigating corruption between the two nations that makes all of this quid pro quo stuff ....

pure BS...?

It might be a "Treaty" (ratified with 2/3 of the Senate) or just an agreement, but the point is, there is an agreement at minimum.
For unvaccinated, we are looking at a winter of severe illness and death — if you’re unvaccinated — for themselves, their families, and the hospitals they’ll soon overwhelm. Sloe Joe Biteme 12/16
I will NOT comply.
 
Castillo del Cyber Autonomous Zone ~~~~~>                          :dontfeed:

Offline skeeter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26,717
  • Gender: Male
@skeeter
That's 35 page document.  Why are you sending me homework? 

I'm human scum happy77
I ain't gonna read that.  If million dollar Trump donor Sondland says it was a quid pro quo, I take him at his word.  I'll let the House decide if it's impeachable.

Why allow troublesome contradictory details intrude upon your zen mind.

Orange man bad hmmmmmmmm

Offline Hoodat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 37,285
Only Democrats consider it an impeachable offense to fight against corruption.
If a political party does not have its foundation in the determination to advance a cause that is right and that is moral, then it is not a political party; it is merely a conspiracy to seize power.     -Dwight Eisenhower-

"The [U.S.] Constitution is a limitation on the government, not on private individuals ... it does not prescribe the conduct of private individuals, only the conduct of the government ... it is not a charter for government power, but a charter of the citizen's protection against the government."     -Ayn Rand-

Offline XenaLee

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15,398
  • Gender: Female
  • Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum
Only Democrats consider it an impeachable offense to fight against corruption.

Which pretty much explains why they want convicted felons to be able to vote.  They are shock-sure who those criminals would vote for.
No quarter given to the enemy within...ever.

You can vote your way into socialism, but you have to shoot your way out of it.

Offline Right_in_Virginia

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 80,277
Why allow troublesome contradictory details intrude upon your zen mind.

Orange man bad hmmmmmmmm

 88devil

Offline cato potatoe

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,960
  • Gender: Male
I'm human scum happy77

If it makes you feel any better, Sondland is going to be demoted to human scum pretty soon. 

Offline aligncare

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 25,916
  • Gender: Male
Isn't insuring a recipient country is taking measures to combat corruption a legal requirement of granting that US aid?

A great point and one that Andrew McCarthy makes. He thinks rather than say there is no quid pro quo, President Trump should put it into context and say there was no improper quid pro quo—since that simply acknowledges that all foreign aid is conditional and that Trump acted within his proper role.

Hey, taxpayer money isn’t handed out to foreign governments just for the heck of it. Foreign leaders need inducements to pick up the phone when we call for their assistance.

Offline mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 385,392
  • Let's Go Brandon!
Mark Meadows: Gordon Sondland's Testimony Does NOT Confirm Quid Pro Quo

Quote
Rep. Mark Meadows (R-NC) tweeted on Tuesday that despite what many media headlines are reporting with regards to Ambassador Gordon Sondland's testimony, he did not confirm there was a case of quid pro quo between President Trump and Ukraine.

"Seeing many overblown (and outright false) reports about Ambassador Sondland's testimony. Here's what he actually said. 1. I did not (and still don't) know why aid was held up 2. I 'PRESUMED' it was because of corruption 3. I told Yermak my assumption," said Meadows, who sits on the House Oversight and Reform Committee.

more
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/juliorosas/2019/11/05/mark-meadows-sondlands-testimony-does-not-confirm-quid-pro-quo-n2555965
Proud Supporter of Tunnel to Towers
Support the USO
Democrat Party...the Party of Infanticide

“Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.”
-Matthew 6:34

Offline OfTheCross

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 739
Mark Meadows: Gordon Sondland's Testimony Does NOT Confirm Quid Pro Quo

more
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/juliorosas/2019/11/05/mark-meadows-sondlands-testimony-does-not-confirm-quid-pro-quo-n2555965

So, Sondland believes the aid was held up because it was tied to the Ukrainians announcing publicly an investigation into Biden?

Sounds like they've got more digging to do. Have they subpoenaed anyone with first hand knowledge?
If a well-regulated militia be the most natural defense of a free country, it ought certainly to be under the regulation and at the disposal of that body which is constituted the guardian of the national security.

Offline XenaLee

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15,398
  • Gender: Female
  • Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum
So, Sondland believes the aid was held up because it was tied to the Ukrainians announcing publicly an investigation into Biden?

Sounds like they've got more digging to do. Have they subpoenaed anyone with first hand knowledge?

The rats don't need first hand knowledge.  They don't even want it.   Why do you think they changed the whistleblower criteria to include "hearsay".  (duh)
No quarter given to the enemy within...ever.

You can vote your way into socialism, but you have to shoot your way out of it.