Young Adults Fed Up with SJW and LGBTQ Tyranny

[rangerrebew]

October 26, 2019
Young Adults Fed Up with SJW and LGBTQ Tyranny
By Lloyd Marcus

The new “Batwoman” TV series featuring an openly lesbian Batwoman is failing big-time. I was pleasantly surprised to learn that young adults are turned off by the show's extreme woke and SJW (social justice warrior) politically correct messaging. “Woke” means you are aware of social and racial injustice. “Woke” also means straight white men are the source of all evil and must be punished. Women and minorities are perfect in every way. Woke culture says anyone who dares criticize a woman or a minority hates women and minorities.

Batman fans are outraged over the “Batwoman” TV series trashing Batman and its in-your-face trashing of men. If there were such a thing as a woke-a-meter with a range of 1-10, “Batwoman” would receive an 11.

It was a pleasure to learned that young adults are fed up with SJW Hollywood writers and producers destroying their favorite movie franchises. The 2016 Ghostbusters movie bombed, losing $70 million, infected with woke. SJW has infected Star Wars and various superhero movies. Angry fans say, “Get woke, go broke!” Hollywood has declared that SJW, diversity and gender-swapping in movies is more important than entertaining stories.

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2019/10/young_adults_fed_up_with_sjw_and_lgbtq_tyranny.html

[Fishrrman]

"Batman fans are outraged over the “Batwoman” TV series trashing Batman and its in-your-face trashing of men. If there were such a thing as a woke-a-meter with a range of 1-10, “Batwoman” would receive an 11.
It was a pleasure to learned that young adults are fed up with SJW Hollywood writers and producers destroying their favorite movie franchises."

Then ACT like you're fed up.
Then VOTE like you're fed up.

(probably wishful thinking...)

[Smokin Joe]

"Batman fans are outraged over the “Batwoman” TV series trashing Batman and its in-your-face trashing of men. If there were such a thing as a woke-a-meter with a range of 1-10, “Batwoman” would receive an 11.
It was a pleasure to learned that young adults are fed up with SJW Hollywood writers and producers destroying their favorite movie franchises."

Then ACT like you're fed up.
Then VOTE like you're fed up.

(probably wishful thinking...)

Already do, and have, for some time. Gratuitous faggotry unessential to the plot, or excessive SJW-ism is rewarded by the show/movie/other product or vendor NOT getting our patronage. There are other things to do, and I'd just as soon watch the grass die/grow.

[kidd]

Stand up comedians are getting tired of it too.
https://www.vulture.com/2018/10/john-mulaney-on-why-big-comedians-wont-perform-at-colleges.html

Big names like Jerry Seinfeld, Chris Rock and John Mulaney won't perform at colleges because they are too PC. They simply don't get the humor.

[Smokin Joe]

Stand up comedians are getting tired of it too.
https://www.vulture.com/2018/10/john-mulaney-on-why-big-comedians-wont-perform-at-colleges.html

Big names like Jerry Seinfeld, Chris Rock and John Mulaney won't perform at colleges because they are too PC. They simply don't get the humor.

Where were they when Andrew Dice Clay was getting reeducated?

[verga]

The same thing is true of the Supergirl series. They have gay and tranny characters as well as demonstrating a serious anti-Conservative bias. The numbers are falling.

[roamer_1]

The same thing is true of the Supergirl series. They have gay and tranny characters as well as demonstrating a serious anti-Conservative bias. The numbers are falling.

@verga
A big part of my religious study is identifying the enemy - Real occult teachings as found in both the church and popular culture...

That puts some pretty weird stuff on my watch list...
An example of that would be the new TV series 'Charmed' , which is a redo of the earlier series, which was quite popular.

A comparison between the old 'Charmed' (which was bad enough), and the new, is eye-opening. Beyond the witchcraft, Baphomet raises his head in the form of multi-genderism, lesbianism, and homosexuality portrayed as normative... Open sexuality with multiple partners as way-of-life... along with SJW subjects part and parcel...

Make no mistake about where these concepts originate. It is not political.

[240B]

I've said for years that if you believe American popular culture, you would think that close to 50% of Americans are gay, or trans, or whatever weirdo thing the media is pushing. The reality is much different than the way popular media portrays this stuff. Depending on which poll you cite, these gay/trans people are at most less than 10% of the population and at worst less than 3% of the population.

The American media pushes the idea that gay/trans people are as common as Black people or any other minority. But this push is based on agenda and wishes. It is not based on fact in any way.

[Smokin Joe]

I've said for years that if you believe American popular culture, you would think that close to 50% of Americans are gay, or trans, or whatever weirdo thing the media is pushing. The reality is much different than the way popular media portrays this stuff. Depending on which poll you cite, these gay/trans people are at most less than 10% of the population and at worst less than 3% of the population.

The American media pushes the idea that gay/trans people are as common as Black people or any other minority. But this push is based on agenda and wishes. It is not based on fact in any way.

It might be fact in the hotbeds of such behaviour, among which are New York City and Washington D.C.
There was a time when some 5-10% of D.C. was homosexual (including "bi", because you can't do both without the homo thing), and I have little doubt that concentration has influenced policy.


Check out any HS or College Drama department, and you will find there is a concentration of homosexuals there as well, with that influence spilling over into the "entertainment" media.
Behind it all, are those who decide what goes on the air, and the seemingly mandatory homosexual relationships and scenes in screen media, in print, and even the characters in sitcoms, distort the perceptions of Americans. That the behaviour is 'protected' gives it undue emphasis, while alternative behaviour (heterosexuality, moral values, even Christianity) is squelched and ends up on the cutting room floor.

However, people see the media as the reflection of the culture, and the libertine effect of everything from print to film to music has caused some to shift, but still others to be repelled as they see the seedier dark side to a lifestyle that is downplayed by the media. People are getting burned out on having sexuality, especially that which they consider abnormal, shoved into the middle of everything, as predictable as a cheap porno flick.

As someone once said, "The love that dared not speak its name, now just won't shut up."

As for me, I won't watch it, read it, no thanks. I refuse to subsidize the merchants of such a grave sin.

[goatprairie]

It might be fact in the hotbeds of such behaviour, among which are New York City and Washington D.C.
There was a time when some 5-10% of D.C. was homosexual (including "bi", because you can't do both without the homo thing), and I have little doubt that concentration has influenced policy.


Check out any HS or College Drama department, and you will find there is a concentration of homosexuals there as well, with that influence spilling over into the "entertainment" media.
Behind it all, are those who decide what goes on the air, and the seemingly mandatory homosexual relationships and scenes in screen media, in print, and even the characters in sitcoms, distort the perceptions of Americans. That the behaviour is 'protected' gives it undue emphasis, while alternative behaviour (heterosexuality, moral values, even Christianity) is squelched and ends up on the cutting room floor.

However, people see the media as the reflection of the culture, and the libertine effect of everything from print to film to music has caused some to shift, but still others to be repelled as they see the seedier dark side to a lifestyle that is downplayed by the media. People are getting burned out on having sexuality, especially that which they consider abnormal, shoved into the middle of everything, as predictable as a cheap porno flick.

As someone once said, "The love that dared not speak its name, now just won't shut up."

As for me, I won't watch it, read it, no thanks. I refuse to subsidize the merchants of such a grave sin.

I liked it a lot better when they were all in the closet. Everybody knew Liberace, Paul Lynde, Truman Capote, and  some notable others were homosexuals.
However, they, the celebrities,  didn't make a big deal about it, and everybody else just laughed or smirked and didn't make a big deal about it either.
But ever since the AIDs crisis when homosexuals blamed everybody but themselves for the deaths, I have little or no tolerance or sympathy for homosexuals and other sexual oddities.
They've just gone too far. They deserve to be knocked down a few pegs.

[Wingnut]

Promoting and celebrating faggotry must be big biddness.  How much money can be made pandering to 3% of the population.   Got to be woke.

[libertybele]

I liked it a lot better when they were all in the closet. Everybody knew Liberace, Paul Lynde, Truman Capote, and  some notable others were homosexuals.
However, they, the celebrities,  didn't make a big deal about it, and everybody else just laughed or smirked and didn't make a big deal about it either.
But ever since the AIDs crisis when homosexuals blamed everybody but themselves for the deaths, I have little or no tolerance or sympathy for homosexuals and other sexual oddities.
They've just gone too far. They deserve to be knocked down a few pegs.

Supposedly we as a society have become more accepting of one another, but I see acceptance of LGBTQRSTUVWXYZ as approving the moral decay in our society.  Some of those same people that have been shown tolerance and acceptance now expect to be given preferential treatment; dead wrong in my books.

[Smokin Joe]

Supposedly we as a society have become more accepting of one another, but I see acceptance of LGBTQRSTUVWXYZ as approving the moral decay in our society.  Some of those same people that have been shown tolerance and acceptance now expect to be given preferential treatment; dead wrong in my books.

It is the same with any group howling for "equality". They don't want equality, they want "paybacks", which means preferential treatment, and dominion over their alleged former oppressors.

Back before having discriminating taste became a bad thing, our society realized some things simply should not be tolerated.
Since then, over 60 million babies have been sacrificed on the altar of convenience, and countless children exposed to unspeakable acts at an early age via media, or worse, in person, because it has become fashionable to cower in fear of what we once openly denounced as evil.

[goatprairie]

Supposedly we as a society have become more accepting of one another, but I see acceptance of LGBTQRSTUVWXYZ as approving the moral decay in our society.  Some of those same people that have been shown tolerance and acceptance now expect to be given preferential treatment; dead wrong in my books.

What liberals, and apparently many conservatives, now believe is that virtually everybody agrees that homosexuality is morally/ethically equivalent to heterosexuality.
That would be the wrong way to think.
Many people, like myself, tolerate homosexuals because we believe consenting adults should be allowed to do whatever they want in the privacy of their homes.
However, that does not mean we believe homosexuality is any less some kind of aberration. It is not the equivalent of heterosexuality.
In fact, if there was some way to cure it, I'm all for it. It is not normal for people  to want to stick their genitals into somebody else's rectum as a major form of sexual intercourse. That's as polite as I can put it.
If homosexuality were normal, we'd have countries of mostly men or women.
There has never been a country like that in the history of the world, because it's an impossibility.
So while I tolerate homosexuals, they should not be promoted or celebrated.
 Promoting homosexuality harms healthy societies.

[skeeter]

It is the same with any group howling for "equality". They don't want equality, they want "paybacks", which means preferential treatment, and dominion over their alleged former oppressors.

Back before having discriminating taste became a bad thing, our society realized some things simply should not be tolerated.
Since then, over 60 million babies have been sacrificed on the altar of convenience, and countless children exposed to unspeakable acts at an early age via media, or worse, in person, because it has become fashionable to cower in fear of what we once openly denounced as evil.

Today the term "civil rights" doesn't mean equality. It means advantage.

The various groups currently under its aegis are no better than buzzards picking over the national carcass.

[libertybele]

It is the same with any group howling for "equality". They don't want equality, they want "paybacks", which means preferential treatment, and dominion over their alleged former oppressors.

Back before having discriminating taste became a bad thing, our society realized some things simply should not be tolerated.
Since then, over 60 million babies have been sacrificed on the altar of convenience, and countless children exposed to unspeakable acts at an early age via media, or worse, in person, because it has become fashionable to cower in fear of what we once openly denounced as evil.

   Great post!

[verga]

Supposedly we as a society have become more accepting of one another, but I see acceptance of LGBTQRSTUVWXYZ as approving the moral decay in our society.  Some of those same people that have been shown tolerance and acceptance now expect to be given preferential treatment; dead wrong in my books.

The sin that dare not speak it's name won't sit down and STFU.

[Fishrrman]

skeeter wrote:
"Today the term "civil rights" doesn't mean equality. It means advantage."

Which is why (repeatedly) on the forum I've said that the Civil Rights Act was one of the worst laws passed in the history of the nation.

And right next to it, another terrible law -- the Voting Rights Act.

Very destructive to the national fabric, BOTH of them!