Hillary, Pots, Kettles, and RussiansHillary Clinton is right. Gabbard is right. Trump (mostly) is right. They're all tools of the Russians. That's because the Russians don't have a "candidate." They are targeting our process.by Steve Berman
October 20th, 2019Hillary Clinton strongly, publicly, intimated that her fellow Democrat Tulsi Gabbard was a Russian asset. She said the Russians “got their eye on somebody who’s currently in the Democratic primary and are grooming her to be the third-party candidate.†Asked to clarify if she was referring to Gabbard, Herself replied “If the nesting doll fits…â€
Of course, Herself has over the years fit nicely into the nesting doll. Remember Rosatom? Allow me to refresh your memory.
As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.
And shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock.
- Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal, New York Times, April 23, 2015Gabbard didn’t take kindly to the accusation, tweeting “Great! Thank you [Hillary Clinton]. You, queen of warmongers, embodiment of corruption, and personification of the rot that has sickened the Democratic Party for so long, have finally come out from behind the curtain.â€
<..snip..>
https://theresurgent.com/2019/10/20/hillary-pots-kettles-and-russians/
