When Does Serial Lying Become Disqualifying, Liz?

[mystery-ak]

October 16, 2019
When Does Serial Lying Become Disqualifying, Liz?
By Jon N. Hall

Right now, the three leading candidates for the Democrat presidential nomination are all septuagenarians.  On Election Day next year, Bernie Sanders will be 79, Joe Biden will be 78, and Liz Warren will be 71.  It may be over for the two oldest.  Bolshevik Bernie just suffered a heart attack and had two stents inserted.  (Now he's Bionic Bernie.)  Joe, often fumbling for words, has appeared "frail" from the get-go.  And we shouldn't forget the appearance of influence-peddling in Ukraine and China.  That leaves Liz, who by comparison to the other two is a spring chicken.  But Senator Warren has her own issues.

On October 7, Fox News's Tucker Carlson aired a montage of Warren on the campaign trail where she repeatedly asserts that she was "visibly pregnant" and that her employer "wished me luck" and then "hired someone else."  Watch the video montage and notice how similar her deliveries are.  At each venue, she retells her story with the same well rehearsed inflections and mannerisms.  These canned performances are all the more embarrassing because they repeat a lie.

Earlier on October 7, the Free Beacon ran "County Records Contradict Warren's Claim She Was Fired over Pregnancy" by Collin Anderson.  The article included the 12 pages of the minutes of the school board meeting in an easy-to-navigate SCRIBD box where the parts concerning Warren are circled:

    Minutes of an April 21, 1971, Riverdale Board of Education meeting obtained by the Washington Free Beacon show that the board voted unanimously on a motion to extend Warren a "2nd year" contract for a two-days-per-week teaching job.  That job is similar to the one she held the previous year, her first year of teaching.  Minutes from a board meeting held two months later, on June 16, 1971, indicate that Warren's resignation was "accepted with regret."

more
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2019/10/when_does_serial_lying_become_disqualifying_liz.html

[XenaLee]

Warren is, indeed, a serial liar.   Which makes it odd that she refused to answer a yes or no question last night when asked if her "plan" would require that the middle class pay higher taxes.   She could have just lied like she usually does and said no.  She dodged the question by saying the "costs" for healthcare would be lower.   Ah, but the catch is.... assuming she wasn't lying there, too.... that the middle class would be paying sky-high taxes to pay for ALL of the leftist utopian "plans"....

and therefore the middle class costs would be exponentially higher and out the wazoo.  Can't say that though.  And if the voters are stupid enough to not know the reality, too bad for them, eh?   And then there's the contingent of voters that pay no taxes (the takers) and live off of the sweat of others (the producers) their entire lives.  You know... the ones that now make up about half of the country.... and vote according to their own interests (welfare hos voting for Democrats) every election.

[rangerrebew]

Disqualifying?  Far from it.  That is the red badge of courage to democrats.

[Cyber Liberty]

It's not a bug, it's a feature.