Oh but we DO have to know. Since the person who actually 'heard' the conversation was someone else, who also doesn't want their identity reveled, and passed the 'info' to the 'whistleblower' (who isn't really a whistleblower), the 'whistleblower' doesn't have any idea what was said and can't 'prove' a damn thing.
On the other hand, the president released the call transcripts, although he didn't have to. Thats all the proof you're gonna get, and all we need.
I cannot wait to find out who the players are - its gonna be epic.
The fact that a leak—normally a criminal act—was repackaged as a whistleblower complaint—with all it’s legal protections—indicated to me that this was a set up from the start.
But this leaker only had second hand knowledge—how could this qualify as a whistleblower complaint? Well, just weeks earlier the CIA whistleblower rules were changed to allow hearsay complaints. No, that doesn’t raise any suspicions.
Truthfully though, the second I heard a new scandal had launched I knew it was another phony set up. What I hadn’t suspected however was that this one was hatched by the CIA! First they deployed the FBI. When that failed to get rid of Trump they’re trying the CIA. This one will bomb out, too.
