Trump says administration looking 'seriously' at ending birthright citizenship

[rustynail]

Anchors aweigh!

[DCPatriot]

Sorry ...it doesn't.  I already showed in the post you quoted of mine where anchor babies and chain migration sprung from a footnote Justice William Brennan wrote in a 5-4 decision in Plyler v. Doe.

Liberal justices and lefties like yourself love to use footnotes and passages from books to make law and then act like the bad law that gets created is somehow a Constitutional right.

I heard this explained on talk radio today.   

It's still scary though, that nine men in robes get to decide.   

IMO, you give up your sovereignty as a nation when you let the courts decide instead of the People.  Your citizenship is worthless.

[Bill Cipher]

Sorry Oceander...it doesn't.  I already showed in the post you quoted of mine where anchor babies and chain migration sprung from a footnote Justice William Brennan wrote in a 5-4 decision in Plyler v. Doe.

Liberal justices and lefties like yourself love to use footnotes and passages from books to make law and then act like the bad law that gets created is somehow a Constitutional right.

You do realize that doxxing someone is illegal.  Even when you’re wrong about who you think they are.

Also, you’re extremely partial as a moderator.  Does everyone here know that you’re a moderator?

What else should people know about what goes on behind the scenes?

Who reads members’ pms?  Anyone?  I know enough about simple machines to know that pms aren’t encrypted. 

On the subject matter: you showed nothing of the kind.  You love to cherry pick isolated sentences that you think mean more than they do, and then you simply ignore the plain text of the Constitution itself, and the publicly available legislative history behind the 14th Amendment because it conflicts with your cherished prejudices.   

[DCPatriot]

You do realize that doxxing someone is illegal.  Even when you’re wrong about who you think they are.

Also, you’re extremely partial as a moderator.  Does everyone here know that you’re a moderator?

What else should people know about what goes on behind the scenes?

Who reads members’ pms?  Anyone?  I know enough about simple machines to know that pms aren’t encrypted.

Come on...Please lighten up.

Anybody that has been on the board daily, knows that Oceander is Bill Cipher.

I've responded to several people who asked...and not in PM.   Right on the board.

I still don't see any problem with it.

You're not the only one posting right now that used to be members under different names.   Let it go! 

[Bill Cipher]

Come on...Please lighten up.

Anybody that has been on the board daily, knows that Oceander is Bill Cipher.

I've responded to several people who asked...and not in PM.   Right on the board.

I still don't see any problem with it.

You're not the only one posting right now that used to be members under different names.   Let it go! 

That I’m not.  However, the fact that a known moderator is poking his nose into my business tells me that he’s doxxing me, even if he’s wrong. 

[rustynail]

Is anything real anymore?

[skeeter]

You do realize that doxxing someone is illegal.  Even when you’re wrong about who you think they are.

Also, you’re extremely partial as a moderator.  Does everyone here know that you’re a moderator?

What else should people know about what goes on behind the scenes?

Who reads members’ pms?  Anyone?  I know enough about simple machines to know that pms aren’t encrypted. 

On the subject matter: you showed nothing of the kind.  You love to cherry pick isolated sentences that you think mean more than they do, and then you simply ignore the plain text of the Constitution itself, and the publicly available legislative history behind the 14th Amendment because it conflicts with your cherished prejudices.

If you cared enough about others not connecting the dots you could've changed up your usual content & posting style a bit. Geez.

[mystery-ak]

That I’m not.  However, the fact that a known moderator is poking his nose into my business tells me that he’s doxxing me, even if he’s wrong.

@txradioguy is NOT a Mod...and if he is doxxing you I WILL ban him...

NO ONE HERE reads pm's.....only 3 people here have access to them and none of us goes into the database....You are accusing TBR of misconduct...which is in insult to me and my staff.

[Bigun]

@txradioguy is NOT a Mod...and if he is doxxing you I WILL ban him...

Doxing involves real things @mystery-ak.  Not made up former or current screen names.  I've seen nothing approaching that here.

[Bill Cipher]

@txradioguy is NOT a Mod...and if he is doxxing you I WILL ban him...

NO ONE HERE reads pm's.....only 3 people here have access to them and none of us goes into the database....You are accusing TBR of misconduct...which is in insult to me and my staff.

If the shoe fits .....

[skeeter]

If the shoe fits .....

Yep, you're Oceander all right.

[mystery-ak]

If the shoe fits .....

This is doxxing

Doxing or doxxing is the Internet-based practice of researching and broadcasting private or identifying information [nope] about an individual or organization. The methods employed to acquire this information include searching publicly available databases and social media websites, hacking, and social engineering. [nope again]  Wikipedia

do yourself a favor and leave before I help you.

[Bill Cipher]

@txradioguy is NOT a Mod...and if he is doxxing you I WILL ban him...

NO ONE HERE reads pm's.....only 3 people here have access to them and none of us goes into the database....You are accusing TBR of misconduct...which is in insult to me and my staff.

Then he’s either impersonating one, or hacked a moderator account, because he had bragged before about putting people into timeout.

[Bill Cipher]

This is doxxing


do yourself a favor and leave before I help you.

Since I can’t delete my account, why don’t you do me the favor.  bleep you. 

[DCPatriot]

That I’m not.  However, the fact that a known moderator is poking his nose into my business tells me that he’s doxxing me, even if he’s wrong.

He's not doxxing you.

He's letting everyone in the conversation know that you're the attorney, aka as Oceander.

Furthermore, I think he did it as a form of respect.  'Oceander' held his ground for years around here.   

He was letting you know that he wasn't fooled and neither should anybody else on the thread.

[Cyber Liberty]

He's not doxxing you.

He's letting everyone in the conversation know that you're the attorney, aka as Oceander.

Furthermore, I think he did it as a form of respect.  'Oceander' held his ground for years around here.   

He was letting you know that he wasn't fooled and neither should anybody else on the thread.

Ooopsie!  Must have burned up on re-entry.

[HoustonSam]

He's not doxxing you.

He's letting everyone in the conversation know that you're the attorney, aka as Oceander.

Furthermore, I think he did it as a form of respect.  'Oceander' held his ground for years around here.   

He was letting you know that he wasn't fooled and neither should anybody else on the thread.

If Bill Cipher really *isn't* Oceander, then both of them need to submit samples to Ancestry.com to find out how they were separated as twins at birth.  I've tangled with both and immediately identified them as identical based on their shared blind faith in the judiciary and thin-skinned insecurity when challenged on purely logical grounds.

[txradioguy]

You do realize that doxxing someone is illegal.  Even when you’re wrong about who you think they are.

Also, you’re extremely partial as a moderator.  Does everyone here know that you’re a moderator?

What else should people know about what goes on behind the scenes?

Who reads members’ pms?  Anyone?  I know enough about simple machines to know that pms aren’t encrypted. 

On the subject matter: you showed nothing of the kind.  You love to cherry pick isolated sentences that you think mean more than they do, and then you simply ignore the plain text of the Constitution itself, and the publicly available legislative history behind the 14th Amendment because it conflicts with your cherished prejudices.

First off O. Take a midol and chill...oh and get a thicker skin. Referring to you by your previous screen name isn’t doxxing  you obtuse dolt.

As someone who has genuinely been fixed twice...calling you by a previous screen name isn’t even close to being doxxed.

Are we clear in that O?

You may think you can threaten me or threaten others on this forum either publicly or privately into bending to your will...but what you really are is a pathetic bully who talks a lot of crap from behind the safety of a keyboard but wouldn’t  say half the shit you type on here to anyone’s face.

Secondly no I’m not a Moderator for this forum. I’m a Cat moderator for the 2nd  Amendment sub category.

So I’m not sure what you were trying to prove. But you failed. If you were trying to get under my skin...you failed.  If you think you scare me...you failed.

Oh and your pathetic attempt to say that anchor babies are covered by the 14th Amendment...yeah...you failed on that too.

[DCPatriot]

If Bill Cipher really *isn't* Oceander, then both of them need to submit samples to Ancestry.com to find out how they were separated as twins at birth.  I've tangled with both and immediately identified them as identical based on their shared blind faith in the judiciary and thin-skinned insecurity when challenged on purely logical grounds.

I've never read any post where he denied it when asked.  Did he?

Everybody knows how I felt about "Oceander".   But..., as Cipher, he was nothing like Ocean.  Decided to let the past be the past.

Strangely, I feel bad for him.   

[Cyber Liberty]

[txradioguy]

He's not doxxing you.

He's letting everyone in the conversation know that you're the attorney, aka as Oceander.

Furthermore, I think he did it as a form of respect.  'Oceander' held his ground for years around here.   

He was letting you know that he wasn't fooled and neither should anybody else on the thread.

We don’t always see eye to eye...but thank you for saying that. 

[txradioguy]

You’re right! 

[DCPatriot]

We don’t always see eye to eye...but thank you for saying that. 

Oh hell...take "Trump" out of the conversation and we'd have gotten along most of the time.   

[IsailedawayfromFR]

If Bill Cipher really *isn't* Oceander, then both of them need to submit samples to Ancestry.com to find out how they were separated as twins at birth.  I've tangled with both and immediately identified them as identical based on their shared blind faith in the judiciary and thin-skinned insecurity when challenged on purely logical grounds.

It's even easier when you inspect their language patterns.

like handwriting analysis, one can who wrote the letter.