The White Supremacy Hoax - Angelo Codevilla

[TomSea]

Excerpt to follow rules, see complete article at link:

The White Supremacy Hoax
Angelo Codevilla - August 12th, 2019

The specter of white supremacy haunts America. Let us empower the government to crush it.

Just yesterday, “the deplorables” were to be deplored because they were “racist, sexist, homophobic,” clingers to “God and guns,” and Russian dupes to boot. Today, the agility and unanimity with which our politicians and media—heck, the ruling class—have shifted to indicting roughly 72 percent of the population as white supremacists, likely violent, would fill with envy their homologues in China, Cuba, North Korea, and other tyrannical places. By comparison, Joseph Goebbels had sloppy message discipline. Not even the Soviets in their salad days were so “on message!”

(snipped)

Here is the latest. The Wall Street Journal on Saturday featured an essay by one Clint Watts, formerly of the FBI and West Point’s Counter Terrorism Center. Watts makes those proposals using the word “white” 16 times in 18 paragraphs. The sociopolitical ideas rife among white people are the main matrix of terrorism in America, Watts contends. Racial profiling, anyone?

Read more at: https://amgreatness.com/2019/08/12/the-white-supremacy-hoax/

[goatprairie]

Yes, WS is threatening a country that still has policies of Affirmative Action i.e. discrimination against white people.
Now I ask you good people, what country that sought to establish dominance of one particular ethnicity/racial group would give special preferences to people not of their racial group?
Wouldn't a country dominated by wss establish rules/policies that would give whites special preferences over non-whites?
The effort by the usual suspects to promulgate the WS dominance theory is a scam, a hoax.
There is no large effort of wss haunting the country and threatening non-whites. All made up by Big Lib Media.

[skeeter]

Their proposals would impose pre-punishment for pre-crimes on persons accused or “suspected” of being a “white supremacist.” By whom? On the basis of what? In practice, a “white supremacist” is anyone whom anyone in power dislikes enough to so label him.

Watts also proposes “red flag” laws, that would allow the government to take away weapons from someone so designated. Loss of weapons would be the least of burdens imposed on anyone so “red-flagged.”

Lets inact those red flags laws pronto. What could go wrong.

[Sanguine]

Loss of weapons would be the least of burdens imposed on anyone so “red-flagged.” Career, reputation, possibly family, would be gone because someone in the notoriously impartial FBI so decided, perhaps with the agreement of the highly scrupulous FISA court, subsequent to ex parte, secret proceedings....

In January 2012, the Department of Homeland Security, in cooperation with the University of Maryland, published a study titled “Hot Spots of Terrorism and Other Crimes in the United States, 1979-2008.” It classified persons who it judged to be “suspicious of centralized federal authority” and “reverent of individual liberty” as “extreme right wing terrorists.” So-called studies published by Clint Watts’ West Point center use the same typology. Skeptical of the government? You’re a potential terrorist.

Yeah, what could go wrong?

[aligncare]

White supremacy is sooo yesterday’s news. (Recent polling shows it’s a loser for the democrats, so they're off on a fresh line of attack).

Watch for this new hoax, developing as we speak: Trump is fast becoming “mentally unstable.”

A few of the talking, empty heads on MSNBC and CNN started the narrative a couple of days ago and is showing up across various network news platforms.

Don’t doubt me.

Trump is nuts! The media said so!