NEW JERSEY School Board member under fire for saying his life would be complete if Congressmuslim Ra

[rangerrebew]

NEW JERSEY School Board member under fire for saying his life would be complete if Congressmuslim Rashida Tlaib were dead

July 28, 2019 by BareNakedIslam

A New Jersey school board member faces calls to resign over what some see as offensive comments he made on Facebook targeting radical Muslim Congresswomen Ilhan Omar (D-MN) and Rashida Tlaib (D-MI). Daniel Leonard is refusing to resign (Good for him!) despite backlash from Muslim community members, and their useful idiots on the Left. As usual, designated terrorist group CAIR (Council on American-Islamic Relations) is filing a complaint demanding Leonard’s resignation or firing.

HUFFPost  Leonard, an enthusiastic supporter of President Donald Trump and a decorated combat veteran, was elected to the school board in 2016. His vitriolic Facebook posts gained national attention this week after a concerned citizen flagged them to the New Jersey chapter of theHamas front group Council on American-Islamic Relations.

Daniel Leonard, a member of the Toms River Board of Education in New Jersey, has said he won’t step down over the comments, which he posted to his Facebook page in April. In one post, Leonard refers to Omar as a “terrorist,” and in another he says his “life would be complete” if Tlaib were dead.

https://barenakedislam.com/2019/07/28/new-jersey-school-board-member-under-fire-for-saying-his-life-would-be-complete-if-congressmuslim-rashida-tlaib-were-dead/

[PeteS in CA]

So, the guy proved he cannot be trusted to treat Muslim students equally, and there are Muslim students in his district. He should be canned or recalled. Those Muslim families and students have the same free exercise rights the families of First Baptist Church or St. Mary Catholic Church (hypothetical names) have, as well as the same right to equal protection under the law.

[sneakypete]

So, the guy proved he cannot be trusted to treat Muslim students equally, and there are Muslim students in his district. He should be canned or recalled. Those Muslim families and students have the same free exercise rights the families of First Baptist Church or St. Mary Catholic Church (hypothetical names) have, as well as the same right to equal protection under the law.

@PeteS in CA

Actually,they don't. Islam is incompatible with with American culture and American laws,and they are nothing more than enemy agents who are attacking America and our Constitution.

[PeteS in CA]

@PeteS in CA

Actually,they don't. Islam is incompatible with with American culture and American laws,and they are nothing more than enemy agents who are attacking America and our Constitution.

They do. Whether citizens of the US or legal resident aliens they have the same protections of the Constitution you or I have. Don't like that? Amend the Constitution.

[sneakypete]

They do. Whether citizens of the US or legal resident aliens they have the same protections of the Constitution you or I have. Don't like that? Amend the Constitution.

@PeteS in CA

I don't have to change anything. Enemy agents dedicated to destroying out country are NOT protected by the Bill of Rights. Now,if they were wearing uniforms that clearly identified them as enemy soldiers they would have some protection,but if you want to get technical,IF they were recognized as being what they are,it would be perfectly legal to kill them where you find them,never mind arrest and deport them.

[Gefn]

Bookmark

[Bill Cipher]

@PeteS in CA

I don't have to change anything. Enemy agents dedicated to destroying out country are NOT protected by the Bill of Rights. Now,if they were wearing uniforms that clearly identified them as enemy soldiers they would have some protection,but if you want to get technical,IF they were recognized as being what they are,it would be perfectly legal to kill them where you find them,never mind arrest and deport them.

Utter nonsense.

[sneakypete]

Utter nonsense.

@Bill Cipher

Seriously? You never heard about the War on Terror? It was in all the papers.

IF we are in a war against Islam,Muslims in America are enemy agents who are trying to subvert our country and destroy the American way of life.

If we are NOT at war against Islam,then they are nothing more than criminals.

[Bill Cipher]

@Bill Cipher

Seriously? You never heard about the War on Terror? It was in all the papers.

IF we are in a war against Islam,Muslims in America are enemy agents who are trying to subvert our country and destroy the American way of life.

If we are NOT at war against Islam,then they are nothing more than criminals.

Again, utter nonsense.  We are not at war with Islam, and unless you have specific evidence of a violation of an applicable criminal code, they aren’t common criminals either. 

They’re just people whom you hate because you prefer judging people based on outlandish stereotypes and not actual facts germane to each particular individual. 

[PeteS in CA]

I don't have to change anything. Enemy agents dedicated to destroying out country are NOT protected by the Bill of Rights. Now,if they were wearing uniforms that clearly identified them as enemy soldiers they would have some protection,but if you want to get technical,IF they were recognized as being what they are,it would be perfectly legal to kill them where you find them,never mind arrest and deport them.

We went this stupid route twice before, in WW1 (Germans) and WW2 (Germans, Italians, and Japanese). Tripling down on stupidity won't make it less stupid.

Utter nonsense.

It's "I like pie" time.

[truth_seeker]

During WW II, we had German-Americans, Italian-Americans, and Japanese-Americans risk and give up their lives, in defense of the basic precepts of America. My FIL was born to Italian immigrant parents.

Our system is based on replacing age old tribal, religious blood fueds, with civil laws of behavior.

The Constitution does NOT require me to like, admire, believe other religions.

It does require me to leave them to themselves, unless they advance into my rights.

If you study colonial towns geopraphic plotes, you will find a place fror a church, a school, etc. At certain points in time, discussions arose for a second church. What space? Would general fund money pay the pastor, etc.

---------------

We have worked througgh most of this, in the United States of America.

[Fishrrman]

PeteS wrote:
"Don't like that? Amend the Constitution."

OK, here ya go.

I believe that this:
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

Should be changed to this:
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. The followers of muhammed are specifically excluded and denied the protections of this amendment along with any and all other Constitutional protections. Neither the United States nor the Several States will offer such protections or liberties to the followers of muhammed."

How does that hit ya...?

[Bill Cipher]

PeteS wrote:
"Don't like that? Amend the Constitution."

OK, here ya go.

I believe that this:
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

Should be changed to this:
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. The followers of muhammed are specifically excluded and denied the protections of this amendment along with any and all other Constitutional protections. Neither the United States nor the Several States will offer such protections or liberties to the followers of muhammed."

How does that hit ya...?

Good luck getting that amendment passed, or ratified. 

[240B]

Calling for the death of anyone no matter who it is in any social media forum will almost always get you in trouble.

There have been many wacko Liberals who have called for the death of Christians, Jews, or Republicans and got away with it. For example Muslims calling for the extermination of Jews/Christians are usually not banned from FaceBook. Palin and her family got many death threats online and most of the time nothing was done about it.

But if you call for the death of a Liberal or one of the Liberal's protected classes, then you are guaranteed to be banned from whatever the site is among other legal problems.

It is a stupid thing to do and it accomplishes nothing except to get you in trouble.

[sneakypete]

PeteS wrote:
"Don't like that? Amend the Constitution."

OK, here ya go.

I believe that this:
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

Should be changed to this:
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. The followers of muhammed are specifically excluded and denied the protections of this amendment along with any and all other Constitutional protections. Neither the United States nor the Several States will offer such protections or liberties to the followers of muhammed."

How does that hit ya...?

@Fishrrman

Can't speak for anyone else,but it works for me.