Author Topic: San Francisco denizens try to chase out the homeless by declaring them bad for the environment  (Read 413 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

rangerrebew

  • Guest
July 12, 2019
San Francisco denizens try to chase out the homeless by declaring them bad for the environment
By Monica Showalter

Up until now, in California, most any project — schools, housing construction, roads, border wall — could be halted by declaring it "bad for the environment."

Bingo.  San Francisco's wealthy denizens around the Embarcadero have just come up with their new best shot for keeping a homeless shelter from being built around their pricey real estate holdings: the environment.  Everyone likes the environment, right?  Only right-wingers have a problem with that one, right?  Homeless = bad for the environment.  Solution: Get the homeless off my doorstep.  Works great.

Here's the backdrop I wrote about last April:

Read more: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2019/07/san_francisco_denizens_try_to_chase_out_the_homeless_by_declaring_them_bad_for_the_environment.html#ixzz5tZ1GDb3q
 

rangerrebew

  • Guest
Aaaah, yes!  Liberal "compassion" at it's finest. 22222frying pan

Offline XenaLee

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15,398
  • Gender: Female
  • Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum
Aaaah, yes!  Liberal "compassion" at it's finest. 22222frying pan

Still wondering how many of those San Francisco homeless were those that were shipped out of Hawaii by their "compassionate liberals"...lol.  And wondering where the libs will ship the SF homeless to.  Probably a red state big city (would be my guess).

No quarter given to the enemy within...ever.

You can vote your way into socialism, but you have to shoot your way out of it.

Offline goatprairie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8,956
Still wondering how many of those San Francisco homeless were those that were shipped out of Hawaii by their "compassionate liberals"...lol.  And wondering where the libs will ship the SF homeless to.  Probably a red state big city (would be my guess).
I think there should be a national referendum taken on the homeless and how many people would be willing to house them in their own homes/property. The  results would be made public so we'd know which liberals are virtue-signaling hypocrites. I'd bet over 90% of liberals would turn down the homeless for their own abodes.

Offline Cyber Liberty

  • Coffee! Donuts! Kittens!
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 80,268
  • Gender: Male
  • 🌵🌵🌵
Hammer (enviros) meet Anvil (virtue signalers).

 :2popcorn: :2popcorn:
For unvaccinated, we are looking at a winter of severe illness and death — if you’re unvaccinated — for themselves, their families, and the hospitals they’ll soon overwhelm. Sloe Joe Biteme 12/16
I will NOT comply.
 
Castillo del Cyber Autonomous Zone ~~~~~>                          :dontfeed:

Offline Snarknado

  • Anti
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,542
The SF homeless have no rights - they're just lowly US citizens. If they were illegals they'd be welcomed with open arms.
---
Everything I need to know I learned in GTA

Offline LMAO

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15,872
  • Gender: Male
Human nature

We all love our belief systems until they  impact us
I have little interest in streamlining government or in making it more efficient, for I mean to reduce its size. I do not undertake to promote welfare, for I propose to extend freedom. My aim is not to pass laws, but to repeal them.

Barry Goldwater

http://www.usdebtclock.org

My Avatar is my adult autistic son Tommy

Offline XenaLee

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15,398
  • Gender: Female
  • Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum
The SF homeless have no rights - they're just lowly US citizens. If they were illegals they'd be welcomed with open arms.

Yes, but...since they are mostly legal US citizens (at least for now... in the present)....

they don't matter to the leftists that run and ruin those states....because the idiot left figures that they (many or most being druggies, belligerents or clinically insane)... don't or won't ever vote, even if driven to the polls.   Therefore, they are irrelevant and expendable (and replaceable with younger, ""new"", more easily controlled homeless indigents).  Just as all of us on the right (non leftists) are irrelevant and expendable to the idiot left.
No quarter given to the enemy within...ever.

You can vote your way into socialism, but you have to shoot your way out of it.

Offline Victoria33

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7,457
  • Gender: Female
"San Francisco denizens try to chase out the homeless by declaring them bad for the environment"

They didn't go far enough to explain "what" the environment "is".
The environment is "people" who are subject to diseases the homeless have.
The "appearance" of the homeless on the streets is not the problem - the unseen bacteria and viruses they carry is the problem.

Offline Polly Ticks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7,984
  • Gender: Female
I thought organic fertilizer was supposed to be more eco-friendly.
 :shrug:
Love is the most important thing in the world, but baseball is pretty good, too. -Yogi Berra