Well I hear you. But it is also true that the medical community suppresses information about natural cures. And people are getting cured naturally. As I said in the above post it is a personal choice. Because with cancer they always give a 5 year cure rate. They never give any promises just the 5 year data. And they never start with any treatment other than Chemo and or radiation. For instance there is immune therapy but first you must get a port and have chemo pumped through it which kills your immune system.
No, the medical community does not suppress information about "natural cures". Many of our modern medicines, like quinine, aspirin and penicillin were developed directly from "natural" sources. The reason "natural cures" are often discouraged is because they are either untested or when tested show no significant benefit. The curcumin in tumeric does work; shark cartilage and apricot pits do not.
I have known people who have gone through chemo and are cancer free so far. I also have known people who have gone through chemo only to have the cancer keep spreading to other organs. My own mother and it was a horrible death. That is why I chose not to do chemo.
That doesn't make sense. In some circumstances, as you say, chemo works. In others, it does not. I'm sorry about your mother and I agree that dying of cancer can be horrible.
Why don't these researchers acknowledge natural cures? There are people out there who are winning their fights with cancer naturaly. And there are scientific studies showing how these things inhibit the growth of the cancer.
Because it cannot be proven that whatever they are doing is what sent their cancer into remission. Until some good, reproducible, double-blind studies have been conducted, it can't be proven that whatever they did had a positive effect on the cancer. Wishing won't make it so.
And, I wish you all the luck possible with your fight. I've had several so I have a pretty good idea of what you're going through. Oh, and my immune system is fine.
