Author Topic: Bird of prey or prey itself?  (Read 1420 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline EasyAce

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10,385
  • Gender: Male
  • RIP Blue, 2012-2020---my big, gentle friend.
Bird of prey or prey itself?
« on: June 26, 2019, 05:58:07 pm »
Which Craig Kimbrel will the Cubs get when he joins the parent club at last?
By Yours Truly
https://throneberryfields.com/2019/06/26/bird-of-prey-or-prey-itself/



One of America’s most famous airport architectures was the TWA international terminal at New York’s Kennedy Airport. Designed by architectural legend Eero Saarinen, the terminal—eventually occupied by JetBlue as part of its terminal complex, but converted since May 2018 into the TWA Hotel—depicted the cleverly stylized image of an eagle’s majestic landing.

When you see Craig Kimbrel on the mound in a baseball game, he assumes a set position taking his catcher’s signs that causes him to perform the single most near-perfect depiction of Saarinen’s masterpiece any human being can perform. Arms bent and elbows up, chest down, the pitcher as bird of prey about to land in or atop the target’s head.

From all appearances, it looks as though Kimbrel will come up to the Cubs either Thursday or Friday, after pitching at their Iowa (AAA) affiliate since 16 June to finish rounding himself into game shape. The question before the house is which version of the 31-year-old righthander the Cubs will get.

Will they get the no-questions-asked shutdown reliever of 2010-2015 and 2017? Will they get the one whose 2016 looked like a single comparatively down season against that body of work? Will they get the 2018 version whose ERA as of that 23 July was 1.90 but swelled to a 2.74 by season’s end?

Or will they get the Kimbrel whose postseason helped inspire Worcester Telegram-Gazette writer Bill Ballou to resist submitting his Hall of Fame ballot—rather than send one without a vote for Hall of Famer Mariano Rivera (ultimately, he sent it anyway with a vote for The Mariano)—because Kimbrel exposed the worthlessness of the save as now defined, since when he pitched “Boston’s victories felt like defeats”?

Beneath the surface of six saves, Kimbrel allowed nineteen baserunners, posted a ghastly 6.18 ERA, and put the Red Sox on so high a tension wire that they didn’t dare think of him when they had the chance to put the World Series away once and for all.

Kimbrel’s misfortune was to enter free agency after the World Series rings the Red Sox reached almost in spite of him. With the memory of his meltdowns still too fresh despite the Red Sox getting to the Promised Land for the fourth time since the turn of this century. With the Red Sox either in Fenway Park or on the road that postseason needing to keep mobile crash cart units standing by.

Against the Yankees in Game One of the division series, Kimbrel suffered only what you might expect to suffer when the Yankees need a big blast, Aaron Judge leading off the top of the ninth with a launch into the right field bullpens, before striking out the side post haste.

He didn’t appear in the Yankees’ Game Two win or, back in Fenway Park, in the Red Sox’s 16-1 Game Three bludgeoning of the Empire Emeritus, but in Game Four the crash carts went from yellow to red alert. Kimbrel went out for the top of the ninth with a 4-1 lead to protect. That’s the last simple thing you can say about it.

He walked Judge to open and surrendered a single to Didi Gregorius almost immediately to follow. He struck out Giancarlo Stanton but walked Luke Voit to load the bases. He plunked pinch hitter Neil Walker on the first pitch to send Judge strolling home and keep the ducks on the pond. He may have been fortunate that Gary Sanchez hit nothing worse than a sacrifice fly, pulling the Yankees to within a run, and that Gleyber Torres grounded out to end it before the paddles had to be charged.

Against the Astros in the American League Championship Series, Kimbrel wasn’t a Game One thought when the Astros took a one-run lead to the top of the ninth and it fell to Brandon Workman to let the Astros put the game out of reach, thanks to a leadoff homer by Josh Reddick and a three-run bomb by Yuli Gurriel.

But Cardiac Craig came out to play in Game Two. He was asked to nail down a 7-4 Red Sox lead, and he ran Red Sox Nation’s temperatures into the life-threatening zone yet again.

He got two swift outs to open, getting Evan Gattis to pop out behind second base and striking out Reddick swinging. Then 2017 World Series MVP George Springer shot one through the hole at shortstop that ended up a double. With Jose Altuve at the plate Kimbrel wild-pitched Springer to third, before Altuve lofted what turned out a high single down the line and toward the Monster to score Springer. Alex Bregman flied out to end it.

The collective sigh of relief had enough thrust to qualify as a potential hurricane.

The Red Sox didn’t need Kimbrel to nail down an 8-2 Game Three win in Houston, but Kimbrel should buy Andrew Benintendi’s steak dinners for five years at least after Game Four. This time, Red Sox skipper Alex Cora asked Kimbrel for two innings. That was almost like asking a suicide bomber to get away with two attacks.

Cardiac Craig opened the eighth with: a single to right that turned into an out when Tony Kemp tried and failed to stretch it into a double; another plunk (Bregman); a double to right (Springer); and, a run-scoring ground out to the hole adjacent to third. (Altuve.) Then he shook off a steal of third to strike Marwin Gonzalez out swinging.

And that was just the overture to the ninth. When Gurriel popped out over the line behind first. When Reddick and Carlos Correa walked back-to-back. When Reddick took third on Brian McCann’s fly to right. When Kemp walked to set up the ducks on the pond. When Bregman sent a line drive to the deeper reach of the left field corner that might have tied the ALCS at two each if Benintendi hadn’t scampered in like a puppy spotting a toy in the short distance and taken the dive that resulted in
the catch of the season, if not the decade, saving both Kimbrel’s and the Red Sox’s hides.

Game Five, in which Red Sox starter David Price re-discovered his changeup and pitched himself six scoreless, masterful innings while his mates found Justin Verlander’s vulnerabilities just often enough, saw Kimbrel on the mound yet again in the ninth. Call it defiance of the Red Sox gods if you must. But Cardiac Craig let them off easy this time, with only a one-out walk, two strikeouts, and the ALCS-winning fly out, almost appropriately, to Benintendi in left.

Those may not have been your grandfather’s Red Sox of outrageous misfortune. But the box scores alone say Kimbrel saved four in those first two sets while leaving you entirely on your own to remember or revisit the gory details behind the saves. Be still, your hearts and stomachs.

In the first two World Series Games against the Dodgers, he was the classic, not the cardiac Kimbrel, striking out two of three hitters in the former and, in the latter, retiring the side in order on a fly out and back-to-back ground outs. Then came Game Three—which ended up going to the bottom of the eighteenth before his Game One strikeout victim Max Muncy ended the marathon with a blast into the left center field bleachers.

Kimbrel shook off a walk to end the bottom of the eighth with a foul pop out behind the plate before getting two outs on a pop and a grounder to open the ninth, then shaking off a ground-rule double before ending the ninth with an infield pop. It may not have been enough to ring an alarm, but it wasn’t exactly calm and peaceful, either.

And in Game Four, brought in for the ninth despite a five-run Red Sox lead, Cardiac Craig came home to roost yet again. He opened with a walk to Brian Dozier before Enrique Hernandez hit a 1-1 service not far from where Muncy’s Game Three finisher landed. He got Muncy to ground out before Justin Turner singled on a dying liner to short left field, but Manny Machado grounded out and Cody Bellinger flied out to end the game before the Red Sox needed to call in the crash carts.

If the Red Sox let Kimbrel get anywhere near Game Five with the chance to slip on the rings, they would have been tried by jury for attempted mass murder. They turned instead to Chris Sale, normally a starting pitcher, to finish the Dodgers off. And Sale gave the Red Sox what they once thought Kimbrel was guaranteed to deliver, striking out the side for game, set, and their fourth return to the Promised Land in the new century.

Kimbrel still thought he had a decent chance at making himself baseball’s first $100 million reliever regardless. Baseball apparently thought through its none-too-discreet laughter that someone spiked his Series-celebratory champagne with one or another controlled substance.

It took him seven months and the June draft, after which any new employer wouldn’t have to surrender anything but his salary to sign him, before the Cubs did just that, for three years and a measly $45 million. He won’t exactly be heading for the welfare office any time soon.

It’s not that the Cubs don’t need a late-game reliever with Kimbrel’s overall flight jacket. Since losing Brandon Morrow after he looked to be posting a magnificent 2018, the Cubs’ bullpen this season has been an inconsistent presence. Steve Cishek, Brandon Kintzler, and Kyle Ryan have overall numbers that won’t make you reach for the rye bottle, but Cishek and Pedro Strop have received most of the game-finishing assignments, and Strop hasn’t been the same pitcher he’d been in the recent past, and they’re both suited better for setup duties.

The good news is that the Cubs right now are at the top of the National League Central heap. The bad news is that they’re there by a thread, a game ahead of the Brewers who still don’t know the meaning of the word “quit.” The worse news is that they’re 5-7 in twelve games including splitting a pair with the Braves in a four-game set.

When Kimbrel joins the Cubs, either for the set final with the Braves at Wrigley Field Thursday or against the Reds in Great American Ballpark to start a weekend series Friday, the Cubs can be forgiven if they ask which Kimbrel comes out to play.

Will it be the Kimbrel who resembles a stylized eagle landing after a majestic flight and pitched like one for a long enough time? Or will it be the bird of prey who becomes the prey itself? The Cubs’ season may turn considerably on the answer.
--------------------
@Polly Ticks
@AllThatJazzZ
@AmericanaPrime
@andy58-in-nh
@Applewood
@Bigun
@catfish1957
@corbe
@Cyber Liberty
@DCPatriot
@dfwgator
@EdJames
@Freya
@The Ghost
@goatprairie
@GrouchoTex
@Mom MD
@musiclady
@mystery-ak
@Right_in_Virginia
@Sanguine
@skeeter
@Skeptic
@Slip18
@Suppressed
@SZonian
@TomSea
@truth_seeker


"The question of who is right is a small one, indeed, beside the question of what is right."---Albert Jay Nock.

Fake news---news you don't like or don't want to hear.

Offline Polly Ticks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7,983
  • Gender: Female
Re: Bird of prey or prey itself?
« Reply #1 on: June 26, 2019, 06:08:05 pm »
I kind of hope he comes back on Thursday.

Love is the most important thing in the world, but baseball is pretty good, too. -Yogi Berra

Offline EdJames

  • Certified Trump Realist
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,791
Re: Bird of prey or prey itself?
« Reply #2 on: June 26, 2019, 06:12:43 pm »
I have to say, @EasyAce, I am always amazed at the depth and breadth in which you cover this game!  Especially in the colorful and thought-provoking manner in which you do it!!

 888high58888

Offline Cyber Liberty

  • Coffee! Donuts! Kittens!
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 80,231
  • Gender: Male
  • 🌵🌵🌵
Re: Bird of prey or prey itself?
« Reply #3 on: June 26, 2019, 06:13:50 pm »
Klingons rule, Earthers drool!
For unvaccinated, we are looking at a winter of severe illness and death — if you’re unvaccinated — for themselves, their families, and the hospitals they’ll soon overwhelm. Sloe Joe Biteme 12/16
I will NOT comply.
 
Castillo del Cyber Autonomous Zone ~~~~~>                          :dontfeed:

Offline Polly Ticks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7,983
  • Gender: Female
Re: Bird of prey or prey itself?
« Reply #4 on: June 26, 2019, 06:15:24 pm »
I have to say, @EasyAce, I am always amazed at the depth and breadth in which you cover this game!  Especially in the colorful and thought-provoking manner in which you do it!!

 888high58888

Agreed.  EasyAce is an All-Star in my book.
Love is the most important thing in the world, but baseball is pretty good, too. -Yogi Berra

Offline GrouchoTex

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7,382
  • Gender: Male
Re: Bird of prey or prey itself?
« Reply #5 on: June 26, 2019, 06:23:42 pm »
In both the 2017 and 2018 ALCS against the Astros, Kimbrel looked shaky.

Interesting, that the Astros had success in the 2017 post season against (in order) Chapman, Kimbrel and Jansen, 3 of the best in the game.

Offline EdJames

  • Certified Trump Realist
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,791
Re: Bird of prey or prey itself?
« Reply #6 on: June 26, 2019, 06:35:32 pm »
Agreed.  EasyAce is an All-Star in my book.


Offline EasyAce

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10,385
  • Gender: Male
  • RIP Blue, 2012-2020---my big, gentle friend.
Re: Bird of prey or prey itself?
« Reply #7 on: June 26, 2019, 06:52:10 pm »
@Polly Ticks
@EdJames

You guys are great for my ego!  wink777  :beer:


"The question of who is right is a small one, indeed, beside the question of what is right."---Albert Jay Nock.

Fake news---news you don't like or don't want to hear.

Offline EasyAce

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10,385
  • Gender: Male
  • RIP Blue, 2012-2020---my big, gentle friend.
Re: Bird of prey or prey itself?
« Reply #8 on: June 26, 2019, 06:55:26 pm »
@EdJames
Talk about a packed ballot. There were fifteen Hall of Famers on that 1977 All-Star ballot!


"The question of who is right is a small one, indeed, beside the question of what is right."---Albert Jay Nock.

Fake news---news you don't like or don't want to hear.

Offline EdJames

  • Certified Trump Realist
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,791
Re: Bird of prey or prey itself?
« Reply #9 on: June 26, 2019, 06:59:27 pm »
@EdJames
Talk about a packed ballot. There were fifteen Hall of Famers on that 1977 All-Star ballot!

I certainly enjoyed reminiscing over the names!

Offline EasyAce

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10,385
  • Gender: Male
  • RIP Blue, 2012-2020---my big, gentle friend.
Re: Bird of prey or prey itself?
« Reply #10 on: June 26, 2019, 07:33:28 pm »
@EdJames
Talk about a packed ballot. There were fifteen Hall of Famers on that 1977 All-Star ballot!
@EdJames
There are also several on that ballot who looked like they were on the Hall of Fame track at the time, until their careers were compromised in one way or the other, including:

* Steve Garvey---He wasn't actually as run creative as people remember him; he appeared too much like a mechanical player who was so programmed into a routine that he was perceived as a player who couldn't (or wouldn't) break it even when it would have helped his teams win more if he did break it. (Bill James once called him a Clockwork Baseball Player.) His post-career controversies probably hurt him just as badly.

* Frank White---If he'd hit just a little bit more he might have been one of the first to break the Hall of Fame's bias against players whose main selling points were bringing truckloads of defense to the table; he was arguably the best defensive second baseman of his time.

* Mark Belanger and Dave Concepcion---These guys were the closest thing to Ozzie Smith at shortstop before Smith himself came into the leagues, minus the razzle-dazzle playing style. Except that Belanger couldn't hit a lick and Concepcion could hit only a lick. (And Smith actually improved as a hitter little by little as his career went forward.) If they'd played in the ESPN era, Belanger and Concepcion might have gotten plaques with their defense alone, too.

* Graig Nettles---Anyone who dismisses him didn't see him play, especially in several postseasons where he looked like the son of Brooks Robinson at third base. He didn't hit enough, unfortunately, despite his pronounced power and run poductivity, and he's almost completely parched for black ink (league leadership) while being only partially lubricated for gray ink (league top ten), but if Brooks Robinson was the Hoover at third this guy was at least an Electrolux at that corner. He actually rates as the twelfth best third baseman ever to play the game, though, so it's not impossible that a more metric-minded Veterans Committee subdivision would be tempted to give him a new look---but even the metric minded won't be able to avoid that .248 lifetime hitting average and .329 lifetime on-base percentage. But Nettles was a terrific player.

* Ted Simmons---As catchers go he was a hitting machine. If his defense hadn't taken a swan dive in the second half of his career---and if he hadn't been so obviously displeased when Whitey Herzog wanted to move him to the infield that the White Rat had no choice but to trade him despite his St. Louis popularity---Simmons might have had just enough left to get himself a plaque.

* Dave Parker---Messing with cocaine compromised his career when he was in his absolute prime. He conquered the crystals and had a respectable second act, but it wasn't enough to bump him to Cooperstown.

* Dwight Evans---Maybe the oddest case of the group: he was maybe the best right fielder in the American League in the 1970s (he had range to burn and a howitzer for a throwing arm), but his much-lauded defensive skills actually peaked early (by age 29) while his peak at the plate came right after that (ages 29-37). This is maybe the number one reason why Evans lasted only three years on the BBWAA Hall of Fame ballot. If he could have married his defensive and offensive peaks, even by a four-year overlap, he might actually have found his way to the Hall of Fame. Might.


"The question of who is right is a small one, indeed, beside the question of what is right."---Albert Jay Nock.

Fake news---news you don't like or don't want to hear.

Offline andy58-in-nh

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,760
  • Gender: Male
Re: Bird of prey or prey itself?
« Reply #11 on: June 26, 2019, 07:36:44 pm »
I was thinking about Craig Kimbrel just the other evening, while watching the Red Sox try for the 31st (or was it the 32nd time?) this season to prove that they can still cobble together a successful season without the benefit of a legitimate Closer on their pitching staff. 

Specifically, I was wondering how different the Sox' 2019 campaign might have been to this point had they not allowed Kimbrel to fly the coop, along with Joe Kelly, who (admittedly) is not exactly setting the world on fire or putting fires out in his new L.A. home.  At this moment, the Sox relief corps has managed only 17 saves out of 32 opportunities (53%... or as the stats guys might say, "meh").

It just makes you wonder whether the Red Sox might have been better off eating a little luxury tax for relief, instead of having their fans constantly reaching for the Rolaids... even if Mr. Kimbrel has been known to cause indigestion at times himself.
"The most terrifying force of death, comes from the hands of Men who wanted to be left Alone. They try, so very hard, to mind their own business and provide for themselves and those they love. They resist every impulse to fight back, knowing the forced and permanent change of life that will come from it. They know, that the moment they fight back, their lives as they have lived them, are over. -Alexander Solzhenitsyn

Offline EasyAce

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10,385
  • Gender: Male
  • RIP Blue, 2012-2020---my big, gentle friend.
Re: Bird of prey or prey itself?
« Reply #12 on: June 26, 2019, 07:47:27 pm »
I was thinking about Craig Kimbrel just the other evening, while watching the Red Sox try for the 31st (or was it the 32nd time?) this season to prove that they can still cobble together a successful season without the benefit of a legitimate Closer on their pitching staff.
@andy58-in-nh
The issue isn't so much whether you want a "legitimate closer" on staff---the issue is who do you want as a bullpen stopper when the game is absolutely on the line whether or not it's the ninth inning. Who do you want when you need a stopper right now, rather than when you just need to nail down the ninth inning for the win? Kimbrel overall on the regular 2018 season was that guy, notwithstanding his post-23 July looking not so good as his season until that date, but a) there were times he was absolutely unhittable yet b) the Red Sox didn't think of leveraging him in situations that weren't "save situations" but where games were very much on the line and they didn't go to him. And his horrific postseason left the question very much open as to whether he could or would be that stopper regardless of inning or pre-determined role if you needed a stopper like immediately.

The number one job of a relief pitcher, any relief pitcher, is pitching out of trouble and keeping his team out of it until a) he hands off to the next bull or b) nails the game down shut. Screw the "roles." (Mariano Rivera to one side, the now-traditional closing role is much overrated while the actual definition of relief pitcher as fireman is still very much underrated to the detriment of a lot of teams. Just ask Zach Britton in the 2016 AL wild card game into which he wasn't brought, fatally enough for the Orioles. Or, Trevor Rosenthal in the 2014 National League Championship Series into which he wasn't brought just in time for Travis Ishikawa to nail still-rusty Michael Wacha for a pennant-losing three-run homer. In situations that demanded the best pitcher in the bullpens, who was sometimes the best pitcher on the team period no matter what the win-loss records among the starters were, those managers stuck to The Roles---and blew it bigtime.) You may remember the Indians saying screw-the-"roles" with Andrew Miller in the 2016 postseason with remarkable results until the near-very-end.

Maybe instead of asking who's going to be the next super single-inning "closer," we ought to be asking when some enlightened baseball organisation is going to develop and present the next Jim Konstanty, Joe Page, Elroy Face, Hoyt Wilhelm, or (until his arm went dead trying to throw a slider Ted Williams insisted he try but which wasn't natural to him) Dick Radatz. Or, failing that, who's going to come up with the next Andrew Miller, never mind how tough it was at first to sell the old Andrew Miller . . .
« Last Edit: June 26, 2019, 07:50:58 pm by EasyAce »


"The question of who is right is a small one, indeed, beside the question of what is right."---Albert Jay Nock.

Fake news---news you don't like or don't want to hear.

Offline Polly Ticks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7,983
  • Gender: Female
Re: Bird of prey or prey itself?
« Reply #13 on: June 26, 2019, 08:16:33 pm »
Mariano Rivera to one side, the now-traditional closing role is much overrated while the actual definition of relief pitcher as fireman is still very much underrated to the detriment of a lot of teams.

Dennis Eckersley agrees with you.
Quote
AF: Did you ever feel like relievers and closers don't get enough recognition from fans, from writers, or in terms of the bigger awards?

Eckersley: No, not really. I think if you are a reliever or closer -- to get the Cy Young you've got to have an incredible season. I'm not giving my award back, but I don't often think a reliever should win it. But I also think that as a whole since the bullpens have gotten more attention, closers have gotten more attention. But it's really the set-up guys who should get more attention because the closer's job is not as tough as the guy coming in before him.


https://www.forbes.com/sites/andyfrye/2018/12/12/hall-of-fame-pitcher-dennis-eckersley-talks-closer-role-documentary-film/#39834cd48c12
Love is the most important thing in the world, but baseball is pretty good, too. -Yogi Berra

Offline GrouchoTex

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7,382
  • Gender: Male
Re: Bird of prey or prey itself?
« Reply #14 on: June 26, 2019, 09:12:07 pm »

@EasyAce  is a lock for this ballot, of course.  :beer:
I've noticed that from this ballot, someone really liked that Dodger infield.
They passed up Russell at short stop, though.

Offline EasyAce

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10,385
  • Gender: Male
  • RIP Blue, 2012-2020---my big, gentle friend.
Re: Bird of prey or prey itself?
« Reply #15 on: June 26, 2019, 09:45:56 pm »
Dennis Eckersley agrees with you.
@Polly Ticks
It's nice to know a Hall of Famer agrees with me.  :beer:

But Dennis the Menace I fear is also becoming a boring old fart in his old age---he's complaining about showy stuff when he's the same guy who used to make like he was fanning his pistol after winning a shootout after he struck batters out. Rather exuberantly at that.

Not to mention that when he was one out from consummating his no-hitter when he was young and with the Indians, this is the same Dennis the Menace who pointed at the next batter and hollered, "Get your ass into that batter's box---you are next!"


"The question of who is right is a small one, indeed, beside the question of what is right."---Albert Jay Nock.

Fake news---news you don't like or don't want to hear.

Offline Cyber Liberty

  • Coffee! Donuts! Kittens!
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 80,231
  • Gender: Male
  • 🌵🌵🌵
Re: Bird of prey or prey itself?
« Reply #16 on: June 26, 2019, 10:14:57 pm »
@Polly Ticks
It's nice to know a Hall of Famer agrees with me.  :beer:

But Dennis the Menace I fear is also becoming a boring old fart in his old age---he's complaining about showy stuff when he's the same guy who used to make like he was fanning his pistol after winning a shootout after he struck batters out. Rather exuberantly at that.

Not to mention that when he was one out from consummating his no-hitter when he was young and with the Indians, this is the same Dennis the Menace who pointed at the next batter and hollered, "Get your ass into that batter's box---you are next!"

Classy.  These are the guys who complain when batters pump their fists as they trot the bases after a Home Run. :shrug:
For unvaccinated, we are looking at a winter of severe illness and death — if you’re unvaccinated — for themselves, their families, and the hospitals they’ll soon overwhelm. Sloe Joe Biteme 12/16
I will NOT comply.
 
Castillo del Cyber Autonomous Zone ~~~~~>                          :dontfeed:

Offline andy58-in-nh

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,760
  • Gender: Male
Re: Bird of prey or prey itself?
« Reply #17 on: June 27, 2019, 12:41:04 am »
@EasyAce

The issue isn't so much whether you want a "legitimate closer" on staff---the issue is who do you want as a bullpen stopper when the game is absolutely on the line whether or not it's the ninth inning. Who do you want when you need a stopper right now, rather than when you just need to nail down the ninth inning for the win? Kimbrel overall on the regular 2018 season was that guy, notwithstanding his post-23 July looking not so good as his season until that date, but a) there were times he was absolutely unhittable yet b) the Red Sox didn't think of leveraging him in situations that weren't "save situations" but where games were very much on the line and they didn't go to him. And his horrific postseason left the question very much open as to whether he could or would be that stopper regardless of inning or pre-determined role if you needed a stopper like immediately.
* * *

I'm cool with that. When I use the word "closer", I do so as a fan of the game for lo, these 50+ years (Lord help me) who intends the term to be more inclusive than to simply describe your 9th-inning gunslinger with a rising, 99-mph heater that comes in as Holy Hell hot as the sun on an Arizona tarmac, and a curve ball that drops over the edge of the Earth, making the other team's DH look like Wile E. Coyote with an Acme rubber bat.

Instead, I mean it to describe the kind of arm you can count on in a high-leverage situation in any inning, knowing with a high degree of certainty that he is going to yank your team's bacon out of the fire. The Red Sox currently lack that guy, largely owing to personnel decisions made during the hot stove season.  Which is to say, Nathan Eovaldi cost more than John Henry expected. 
"The most terrifying force of death, comes from the hands of Men who wanted to be left Alone. They try, so very hard, to mind their own business and provide for themselves and those they love. They resist every impulse to fight back, knowing the forced and permanent change of life that will come from it. They know, that the moment they fight back, their lives as they have lived them, are over. -Alexander Solzhenitsyn

Offline EasyAce

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10,385
  • Gender: Male
  • RIP Blue, 2012-2020---my big, gentle friend.
Re: Bird of prey or prey itself?
« Reply #18 on: June 27, 2019, 12:55:14 am »
. . . Nathan Eovaldi cost more than John Henry expected.
Eovaldi isn't the issue; it wasn't a bad signing and nobody knew Eovaldi would need elbow cleanup surgery a few weeks ago. He's probably going to be back for the second half and he should be big for the Red Sox both in the rotation and as a possible bullpen swingman, the role he played so well last postseason.

I do see the potential of Ryan Brasier being moved out of the strictly ninth-inning role, though. His fielding-independent pitching (essentially, your ERA when the defensive outs are removed from the equation, more or less) is an atrocious 4.45; the rest of the Red Sox bullpen has a better than serviceable 3.09 FIP. Matt Barnes now has the lowest FIP in the pen, 2.42. I can see Barnes getting a few more of the save opportunities as well as working in higher-leverage spots a little earlier in the games; likewise, Brandon Workman. (FIP: 2.86.) And one thing they're really missing in that bullpen other than Eovaldi on his swing days---Heath Hembree, also on the injured list.
« Last Edit: June 27, 2019, 12:57:13 am by EasyAce »


"The question of who is right is a small one, indeed, beside the question of what is right."---Albert Jay Nock.

Fake news---news you don't like or don't want to hear.

Offline andy58-in-nh

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,760
  • Gender: Male
Re: Bird of prey or prey itself?
« Reply #19 on: June 27, 2019, 01:13:17 am »
Eovaldi isn't the issue; it wasn't a bad signing and nobody knew Eovaldi would need elbow cleanup surgery a few weeks ago. He's probably going to be back for the second half and he should be big for the Red Sox both in the rotation and as a possible bullpen swingman, the role he played so well last postseason.

I do see the potential of Ryan Brasier being moved out of the strictly ninth-inning role, though. His fielding-independent pitching (essentially, your ERA when the defensive outs are removed from the equation, more or less) is an atrocious 4.45; the rest of the Red Sox bullpen has a better than serviceable 3.09 FIP. Matt Barnes now has the lowest FIP in the pen, 2.42. I can see Barnes getting a few more of the save opportunities as well as working in higher-leverage spots a little earlier in the games; likewise, Brandon Workman. (FIP: 2.86.) And one thing they're really missing in that bullpen other than Eovaldi on his swing days---Heath Hembree, also on the injured list.

Well, after seeing yet another blown save today, it is increasingly difficult to see the Red Sox even making the playoffs, what with the Yankees surging and with both Red Sox starters and their bullpen as maddeningly inconsistent as they have been.
"The most terrifying force of death, comes from the hands of Men who wanted to be left Alone. They try, so very hard, to mind their own business and provide for themselves and those they love. They resist every impulse to fight back, knowing the forced and permanent change of life that will come from it. They know, that the moment they fight back, their lives as they have lived them, are over. -Alexander Solzhenitsyn