Didn’t ignore it at all. Your post proved my point: “shall not be infringed†is not absolute and is not capable of mechanical application without interpretation and resort to resources that lie outside the four corners of the Constitution itself.
Thank you for proving my point.
But I didn't, except in your delusions. One who has been duly convicted of a serious crime forfeits a number of rights.
If they have forfeited the right, by virtue of that conviction, there is no right to be infringed.
Only those who possess their full Rights can have a Right they have not forfeited through their actions infringed.
I have not proven your point, for those in full possession of their Rights, there is to be no infringement of the Right.
For those who have forfeited the Right, there is no Right to be infringed; that Liberty (and property) only taken from them after being duly convicted beyond a reasonable doubt of a serious crime (Felony).