Case already made; repeatedly.
Not much of a case. Other than tossing Dickerson at the wall hoping it will stick, your case has consisted solely of repetition of the original claim.
Roe isn’t going anywhere
QED
and instead of coming to grips with that, and coming up with constructive legal ways to reduce abortion,
Alabama, Georgia, et al, just did exactly that. Their legislatures legislated the will of the people by enacting laws regulating abortion as outlined in Amendment X of the Constitution of the United States of America.
folks seem to think that if they just double down on the anti-abortion laws, they’ll eventually ram it through.
Folks seem to think that if a case comes before the Supreme Court again, that the Court will correct their prior mistake, as they have done numerous times before.
And so, folks end up alienating the very people they need to persuade
The very people they need to persuade? This ought to be good. Exactly what people are you referring to here, and why would they need to be persuaded?
and just end up tarring everyone who is right of center with the brush of religious bigotry.
Religious bigotry? YOU are the one bringing up religion here, not me. From the beginning, my argument has been strictly legal - my argument being that the people of Georgia have the right to establish their own marriage, abortion, murder, theft, fraud, etc. laws within the confines of the Constitution. You clearly do not agree with that argument. Yet so desperate for something of substance to bolster your case, you now toss religion into the mix? Wow.