Mueller Tried to Entrap Trump

[Right_in_Virginia]

Mueller Tried to Entrap Trump
American Thinker, May 31, 2019, William L. Gensert

Robert Mueller knew there was no collusion the first time he read the Steele dossier, which reads as if it was written by a high school sophomore who spent most of his time huffing inhalants behind the gym.  “Hey Dude, let’s get some more gas at the Lukoil…”

At the latest, the indictment of 12 Russians on 02/16/2018 should have been the end of his “collusion” investigation.  Why did Mueller keep going?  To entrap the president into obstructing justice, of course.

Mueller had a plan.  He would use his witchhunt to anger the president enough that he would try to stop the investigation and if he didn’t, compile as much information that could be painted as obstruction for his report, which could then be used as a template for impeachment, where the threshold is lower because the House decides what are “high crimes and misdemeanors.”  Attorney General William Barr put a stop to that.

Prior to the report’s submission, Barr ordered Mueller to highlight the 6e (grand jury material) that by law could not be publicly released.  Mueller disobeyed that order, thinking it would force a delay in releasing the report because redaction would take time.  This would impel Barr to release Mueller’s summaries if he didn’t want to be accused of a cover-up, thus allowing Mueller to set the narrative for the Democrats’ push (putsch?) to impeach.

Instead, Barr created his own summary.  Hence, Mueller’s subsequent letter (which Barr called “snitty”), written to be leaked and promptly leaked, was a means of regaining control of the narrative.  In the letter, the special counsel complained about Barr’s four-page memo, which incidentally, he refused an offer to review.

He didn’t expect his old friend Barr to call him and ask him directly whether there were any inaccuracies in the summary, to which Mueller was forced, multiple times, to admit that there were not.  We know this because Barr testified to it under oath.

More:  https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2019/05/mueller_tried_to_entrap_trump.html

[Jazzhead]

This makes sense to me.   The tell is the leaked Mueller letter to Barr,  which was obviously created for just such purpose.   Otherwise,  Mueller could have just picked up the phone. 

When talking of the indictment of the 12 Russians Mueller said, “Every defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.”  He added in Clintonesque fashion, “if we had had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so.  We did not, however, make a determination as to whether the president did commit a crime.”  (emphasis mine)

A prosecutor does not exonerate.  In America, we have the presumption of innocence.  A prosecutor either indicts or he doesn’t indict.  Yet, according to Mueller, the Russians deserve their presumption of innocence, but the president is presumed guilty until proven innocent.

Mueller needs to hauled up before the proper Senate committee and answer questions about why he turned a simple charge to investigate Russian activities to influence the election into a witch hunt to entrap and ruin a duly elected President.   

[aligncare]

If the Mueller report spoke for itself, what was the purpose of his coming back out for one more statement?

It was, to pour gasoline on the impeachment fire.

Be careful you don’t get caught up in the blaze yourself, Bob.

[Bill Cipher]

Tinfoil hat time, again. 

[skeeter]

If the Mueller report spoke for itself, what was the purpose of his coming back out for one more statement?

It was, to pour gasoline on the impeachment fire.

Be careful you don’t get caught up in the blaze yourself, Bob.

Mueller's report wasn't intended to make a determination concerning criminal activity.

But if Mueller had determined Trump did nothing wrong he would've said so.

And anyone with any questions can go p*ss up a rope.

[rangerrebew]

May 31, 2019
Mueller Tried to Entrap Trump
By William L. Gensert

Robert Mueller knew there was no collusion the first time he read the Steele dossier, which reads as if it was written by a high school sophomore who spent most of his time huffing inhalants behind the gym.  “Hey Dude, let’s get some more gas at the Lukoil…”

At the latest, the indictment of 12 Russians on 02/16/2018 should have been the end of his “collusion” investigation.  Why did Mueller keep going?  To entrap the president into obstructing justice, of course.

Mueller had a plan.  He would use his witchhunt to anger the president enough that he would try to stop the investigation and if he didn’t, compile as much information that could be painted as obstruction for his report, which could then be used as a template for impeachment, where the threshold is lower because the House decides what are “high crimes and misdemeanors.”  Attorney General William Barr put a stop to that.

Read more: https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2019/05/mueller_tried_to_entrap_trump.html#ixzz5pbTmGBrg
 

[Cyber Liberty]

Topics merged.