I don't doubt that some pro-choicers are intellectually dishonest, the same way some pro-lifers and 2A advocates are.
But it is not a "lie" to state that Roe v. Wade, and the decisions prior to that which found a right of personal privacy that, for example, stops a state from banning the use of contraceptives, represent the enshrinement in the Constitution of protection against the denial of these individual liberties by the State.
Until Roe is overturned, the choice right is as much a part of the Constitution as the individual gun right. And until Heller is overturned, the individual gun right is as much a part of the Constitution as the choice right.
There is no hierarchy of individual rights based on whether the right is specifically addressed in the Constitution (free speech) or was found to be under the Constitution's protection by a SCOTUS majority (privacy, individual RKBA). To infer that there is such a hierarchy, or that your gun right is sacrosanct but your daughter's choice right is not, is a lie.
There never was a legitimate privacy issue in Roe. The authors state as much. Therefore...the whole premise that Roe was built on is a lie.
Just like I predicted...you breezed right past the importance of what I said with your fingers planted firmly in your ears going "lalalalala".
Even one of the law clerks that wrote the decision for Justice Blackmun admits it's a fraud ruling.
And yet here you are...the Don Quixote of TBR tilting at imaginary Constitutional rights like the Man of La Mancha tilts at windmills in de Cervantes' classic novel.
There is no "right" in the Constitution to abortion on demand. If there was you'd have showed it to alllll of us after so many have queried you on where exactly in the Constitution it is.
And as usual you start tossing something into the discussion that has nothing to do with the topic. I know a favorite debate tactic of yours is to start tossing around the 2nd Amendment and your Liberal dislike for it in a discussion where it doesn't belong. You like to mish mash the two in order to try and deflect from the shallowness of your argument and defense of a totally fraudulent ruling like Roe.