Author Topic: Top Chicago prosecutor Kim Foxx subpoenaed over Jussie Smollett case  (Read 990 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mrclose

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,233

And here I thought that this had all been swept under the rug! :shrug:

Quote

Chicago’s top prosecutor, Kim Foxx, has been subpoenaed to appear at a hearing over her handling of the Jussie Smollett case, according to a new report.

The Cook County state’s attorney was slapped with the subpoena by a
retired judge who’s pushing for the appointment of a special prosecutor
to look into how Foxx dealt with the controversial case, the Chicago Sun-Times reported.

Ex-appellate Judge Sheila O’Brien also subpoenaed Foxx’s top deputy
Joseph Magats, and filed a document requesting that Smollett appear at
the hearing, the report said.

Foxx came under fire
 when her office suddenly dropped 16 felony disorderly conduct charges
against the “Empire” TV actor. Smollett, who is black and gay, was
accused of staging a hate-crime attack on himself for personal gain and
lying to cops about it.

O’Brien charged that Foxx’s handling of the case was “plagued with irregularity.

“Foxx’s conflict in this matter is beyond dispute,” O’Brien wrote,
adding that Foxx should have sought appointment of a special prosecutor.
 â€œInstead, Foxx misled the public into believing that Smollett’s case
was handled like any other prosecution and without influence.”

The former judge asked that Foxx and Magats produce all the original
documents in the case to prove “that they have not been altered or
destroyed and will not be destroyed throughout this case.”

Foxx’s office is also undergoing an independent inspector-general
investigation on how she handled the case. Three members of her team,
including her chief ethics officer and chief spokesman, have left the office.

https://pagesix.com/2019/04/28/top-chicago-prosecutor-kim-foxx-subpoenaed-over-jussie-smollett-case/?utm_source=maropost&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=news_alert&utm_content=20190428&tpcc=nypbreaking&mpweb=755-7814915-719773137

"Hell is empty, all the devil's are here!"
~ Self

Online Bigun

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 52,404
  • Gender: Male
  • Resistance to Tyrants is Obedience to God
    • The FairTax Plan
Re: Top Chicago prosecutor Kim Foxx subpoenaed over Jussie Smollett case
« Reply #1 on: April 29, 2019, 01:27:26 am »
Excellent news!  Thanks for the post!
"I wish it need not have happened in my time," said Frodo.

"So do I," said Gandalf, "and so do all who live to see such times. But that is not for them to decide. All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given us."
- J. R. R. Tolkien

Offline Applewood

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10,361
Re: Top Chicago prosecutor Kim Foxx subpoenaed over Jussie Smollett case
« Reply #2 on: April 29, 2019, 02:05:50 pm »
A subpoena from a retired judge?  I dunno.  Might not be valid.

But yes, I do hope this whole fishy matter is investigated thoroughly. 

Offline mrclose

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,233
Re: Top Chicago prosecutor Kim Foxx subpoenaed over Jussie Smollett case
« Reply #3 on: April 29, 2019, 07:10:38 pm »
A subpoena from a retired judge?  I dunno.  Might not be valid.

But yes, I do hope this whole fishy matter is investigated thoroughly.

Who can issue a Subpoena?

https://chancellor.berkeley.edu/about/offices/legal-affairs/FAQs#t19n290
"Hell is empty, all the devil's are here!"
~ Self

Offline Applewood

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10,361
Re: Top Chicago prosecutor Kim Foxx subpoenaed over Jussie Smollett case
« Reply #4 on: April 29, 2019, 08:12:35 pm »
@mrclose

Thanks, but it looks like this is state law in California.  Illinois might be different. 

I'd like to see what court case, if any, this judge has filed.  If she doesn't have one, Foxx's attorneys might move to have the subpoena quashed.  '

I'm wondering if this matter is just some political grandstanding and not a serious effort to get at the truth.  If it is serious, however, I wish the judge well. 

Offline mrclose

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,233
Re: Top Chicago prosecutor Kim Foxx subpoenaed over Jussie Smollett case
« Reply #5 on: April 29, 2019, 08:43:01 pm »
@mrclose

Thanks, but it looks like this is state law in California.  Illinois might be different. 

I'd like to see what court case, if any, this judge has filed.  If she doesn't have one, Foxx's attorneys might move to have the subpoena quashed.  '

I'm wondering if this matter is just some political grandstanding and not a serious effort to get at the truth.  If it is serious, however, I wish the judge well.

@Applewood

How do I summon someone into court, so they have to testify?

Quote
To get a subpoena, go to the Circuit Clerk’s office. Fill in: the case name and number; the name and address of the person being subpoenaed; and the date, time, and location of the court hearing where they’re supposed to testify.

Unlike a summons, which must be served by a Sheriff, or an authorized process server, a subpoena can be served by almost anyone. It can also be served by certified mail, as long as there’s a signed receipt proving the witness actually got it.

https://www.illinoislegalaid.org/legal-information/how-do-i-summon-someone-court-so-they-have-testify
"Hell is empty, all the devil's are here!"
~ Self

Offline Applewood

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10,361
Re: Top Chicago prosecutor Kim Foxx subpoenaed over Jussie Smollett case
« Reply #6 on: April 29, 2019, 08:44:42 pm »
Thanks again @mrclose

Offline mrclose

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,233
"Hell is empty, all the devil's are here!"
~ Self

Online Cyber Liberty

  • Coffee! Donuts! Kittens!
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 80,729
  • Gender: Male
  • 🌵🌵🌵
Re: Top Chicago prosecutor Kim Foxx subpoenaed over Jussie Smollett case
« Reply #8 on: April 30, 2019, 12:42:54 am »
@Applewood

How do I summon someone into court, so they have to testify?

Quote
To get a subpoena, go to the Circuit Clerk’s office. Fill in: the case name and number; the name and address of the person being subpoenaed; and the date, time, and location of the court hearing where they’re supposed to testify.

https://www.illinoislegalaid.org/legal-information/how-do-i-summon-someone-court-so-they-have-testify

So there has to already be a case?
For unvaccinated, we are looking at a winter of severe illness and death — if you’re unvaccinated — for themselves, their families, and the hospitals they’ll soon overwhelm. Sloe Joe Biteme 12/16
I will NOT comply.
 
Castillo del Cyber Autonomous Zone ~~~~~>                          :dontfeed:

Offline Maj. Bill Martin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11,095
  • Gender: Male
  • I'll make Mincemeat out of 'em"
Re: Top Chicago prosecutor Kim Foxx subpoenaed over Jussie Smollett case
« Reply #9 on: April 30, 2019, 01:42:32 am »
There is a significant distinction between issuing a subpoena, and serving one.  Serving one is no big deal.   It's the issuance that is important.

In Illinois, parties to a case can have the clerk issue one, as can attorneys.  Joe Schmoe can't unless he's a party to the case.

And obviously, as @Cyber Liberty said, there must be a legal action already filed to have a subpoena issued.
« Last Edit: April 30, 2019, 01:44:40 am by Maj. Bill Martin »

Offline verga

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,737
  • Gender: Male
Re: Top Chicago prosecutor Kim Foxx subpoenaed over Jussie Smollett case
« Reply #10 on: April 30, 2019, 12:02:41 pm »
Interesting turn of events.
The other thing I find interesting is that when Smollett first got caught the cast of "Empire" did everything in their power to distance themselves. Now, not so much. Hypocrites.
In a time of universal deceit - telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
�More than any other time in history, mankind faces a crossroads. One path leads to despair and utter hopelessness. The other, to total extinction. Let us pray we have the wisdom to choose correctly.�-Woody Allen
If God invented marathons to keep people from doing anything more stupid, the triathlon must have taken him completely by surprise.