Author Topic: Confused Gillibrand Doesn’t Realize Electoral College Is Actually in the Constitution… Or She’s Dece  (Read 485 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

rangerrebew

  • Guest
Confused Gillibrand Doesn’t Realize Electoral College Is Actually in the Constitution… Or She’s Deceiving Everyone
 
Published April 4, 2019 at 5:51am
 

Does Kirsten Gillibrand not know that the Electoral College is part of the Constitution? Or is she trying to deceive everyone?

That’s the question raised by a tweet from the New York senator and 2020 presidential contender after a tweet earlier this week regarding yet another plan to scrap it.

According to The Daily Beast, Hawaii Democrat Sen. Brian Schatz became the latest to enter the fray in the frenzied scrum to do away with how we elect the president by introducing an amendment which would abolish the Electoral College and replace it with a national popular vote.

https://www.westernjournal.com/ct/confused-gillibrand-doesnt-realize-electoral-college-actually-constitution-deceiving-everyone/
« Last Edit: April 05, 2019, 02:17:55 pm by rangerrebew »

Online libertybele

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 57,345
  • Gender: Female
The DEM way is to lie and deceive.  If she doesn't realize that the electoral college is part of the Constitution under the 12th  Amendment, then she needs to hang it up.
Romans 12:16-21

Live in harmony with one another; do not be haughty, but associate with the lowly, do not claim to be wiser than you are.  Do not repay anyone evil for evil, but take thought for what is noble in the sight of all.  If it is possible, so far as it depends on you, live peaceably with all…do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good.

Offline IsailedawayfromFR

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,746
Confused?  why not just call a spade a spade and call her ignorant?
No punishment, in my opinion, is too great, for the man who can build his greatness upon his country's ruin~  George Washington

Online libertybele

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 57,345
  • Gender: Female
Confused?  why not just call a spade a spade and call her ignorant?

Ok ... then I'd call her a 'deceiver'.
Romans 12:16-21

Live in harmony with one another; do not be haughty, but associate with the lowly, do not claim to be wiser than you are.  Do not repay anyone evil for evil, but take thought for what is noble in the sight of all.  If it is possible, so far as it depends on you, live peaceably with all…do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good.

Online mountaineer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 78,803
She's just brilliant.
Quote
Gillibrand Twice Refers to Tactical Nuclear Weapons as ‘Tactile’
BY: Cameron Cawthorne   
April 8, 2019 3:00 pm

Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand  (D., N.Y.) called tactical nuclear weapons "tactile" twice Friday during a meet-and-greet in New Hampshire.

Gillibrand, a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, spoke at Flight Coffee in Dover, where she discussed her opposition to the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019.

"We used to say we don't worry about a first strike because a first strike would end in complete devastation of the person who fired nuclear weapons," Gillibrand said. "When you say you want to develop low-yield nuclear weapons that are tactile, what you're saying is you want to use them." [or touch them?]

She later used the term "tactile" again when talking about her opposition to the defense bill. She said that she found it "not believable" when the Trump administration said that if nuclear weapons were usable, then they were a better threat. She said she opposed the entire defense bill because of that one provision. ...
Free Beacon
Support Israel's emergency medical service. afmda.org

Offline Night Hides Not

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5,344
  • Gender: Male
"Tactile" is pretty close to "tactical". Maybe she was heard wrong.

Doesn't mean she's not a nitwit. lol
You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality.

1 John 3:18: Let us love not in word or speech, but in truth and action.