Author Topic: William Barr rejects Democrats' demands for Mueller report  (Read 328 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 383,406
  • Gender: Female
  • Let's Go Brandon!
William Barr rejects Democrats' demands for Mueller report
« on: April 04, 2019, 11:48:04 pm »
 The Washington Times ›

William Barr rejects Democrats' demands for Mueller report
April 04, 2019

Every page of the nearly 400-page Mueller report contains information that cannot be made public and must be redacted, Attorney General William Barr said Thursday, explaining why he has not met congressional Democrats’ deadline for turning it over to them.

Frustrated Democrats fired back, saying they suspect Mr. Barr of covering up for Mr. Trump, and renewing their demands for quick release of the report and for the Justice Department to provide all of Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigative files to Capitol Hill.

In the meantime, Democrats said, Mr. Barr should immediately turn over summaries the Mueller team prepared, but which the attorney general did not release, instead writing his own four-page summary of the report’s conclusions.

“If there is significant daylight between his account and yours, the American people should know that too,” Rep. Jerrold Nadler, New York Democrat and House Judiciary Committee chairman, said in a letter to Mr. Barr.

Details about the summaries were first revealed in a curiously sourced piece late Wednesday in The New York Times.

The paper reported that “some” of Mr. Mueller’s investigations “have told associates” they were unhappy with Mr. Barr’s portrayal of their findings. The article attributes that finding to “government officials and others familiar with their simmering frustrations.” The Washington Post followed with its own similar report Thursday.

Mr. Nadler said he wanted answers.

President Trump, though, said the New York Times report was unworthy.

“The New York Times had no legitimate sources, which would be totally illegal, conceding the Mueller report. In fact, they probably had no sources at all! They are a Fake News paper who have already been forced to apologize for their incorrect and very bad reporting on me,” Mr. Trump wrote.

In a statement, the newspaper fired back: “False. Our reporters interviewed multiple government officials and others to gather the facts for our story.”

Rudolph W. Giuliani, the president’s personal lawyer, attacked Mr. Mueller’s team for the stories, calling them “a bunch of sneaky, unethical leakers.”

The Justice Department was less animated, releasing a statement defending Mr. Barr’s four-page letter last month summarizing the findings.

“Given the extraordinary public interest in the matter, the attorney general decided to release the report’s bottom-line findings and his conclusions immediately — without attempting to summarize the report — with the understanding that the report itself would be released after the redaction process,” Justice Department spokeswoman Kerri Kupec said.

She said Mr. Barr is working with Mr. Mueller on “appropriate redactions” to the report before releasing it to Congress and the public.

Under the law, the Justice Department says, information gleaned from a grand jury, as well as classified information, must be shielded. Ms. Kupec said every page of the report contained some of that information, which explains why it will still take time to scrub the document. She said Mr. Barr has rejected the alternative of releasing the report in parts.

Mr. Barr said last week he plans to release a version by mid-April, if not sooner.

Mr. Nadler said the piecemeal release Mr. Barr worried about is already happening, thanks to the attorney general’s four-page letter.

The congressman said he now wants not only to see the full report and Mr. Mueller’s investigative files, but also demanded all communications between the Mueller team and Mr. Barr.

That includes the summaries reportedly prepared by the special counsel, but which Mr. Barr didn’t release.

“It is notable that the department’s press statement this morning does not deny the existence of these summaries,” Mr. Nadler said Thursday. “If these summaries were, in fact, produced for public consumption by experienced prosecutors, then a precautionary marking should not be an impediment to public production in a very short period of time.”

Democrats have been skeptical of Mr. Barr since he was nominated late last year for the top Justice Department post.

They point to a 19-page memo he authored while in private practice saying Mr. Mueller could not charge the president with obstruction of justice. Democrats have said the memo is proof Mr. Barr is out to shield Mr. Trump rather than make the Mueller report public.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said Thursday the way to cut through the questions was a full, fast production of Mr. Mueller’s work.

“The Mueller report will be released,” the California Democrat told reporters. “To us it is inevitable, to them it is inconceivable. We have to shorten the distance between the inevitable and the inconceivable.”

https://outline.com/wZ4n2H
Proud Supporter of Tunnel to Towers
Support the USO
Democrat Party...the Party of Infanticide

“Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.”
-Matthew 6:34

Offline Chosen Daughter

  • For there is no respect of persons with God. Romans 10:12-13
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,890
  • Gender: Female
  • Ephesians 6:13 Stand Firm in the face of evil
Re: William Barr rejects Democrats' demands for Mueller report
« Reply #1 on: April 05, 2019, 12:17:27 am »
Didn't Trump say he wanted it released to the public?  Another flip flop.  If there is nothing there why would they care?
AG William Barr: "I'm recused from that matter because one of the law firms that represented Epstein long ago was a firm that I subsequently joined for a period of time."

Alexander Acosta Labor Secretary resigned under pressure concerning his "sweetheart deal" with Jeffrey Epstein.  He was under consideration for AG after Sessions was removed, but was forced to resign instead.

Offline libertybele

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 57,424
  • Gender: Female
Re: William Barr rejects Democrats' demands for Mueller report
« Reply #2 on: April 05, 2019, 12:24:54 am »
Didn't Trump say he wanted it released to the public?  Another flip flop.  If there is nothing there why would they care?

The DEMS have to make a ruckus to make it appear that something is being hidden from the public.  There is only so much of the report that can be legally released.  Pelosi and others know this. 

If  Trump said he wanted it released, then obviously he opened his mouth before he knew the facts, but yes, yet another flip flop!
Romans 12:16-21

Live in harmony with one another; do not be haughty, but associate with the lowly, do not claim to be wiser than you are.  Do not repay anyone evil for evil, but take thought for what is noble in the sight of all.  If it is possible, so far as it depends on you, live peaceably with all…do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good.