Mississippi Man Pleads Guilty To Hate Crime Hoax SPLC Used To Slam Trump

[rangerrebew]

 Mississippi Man Pleads Guilty To Hate Crime Hoax SPLC Used To Slam Trump

They lie about stats, they get more money.

Via Daily Wire:

    After the 2016 election, the Southern Poverty Law Center accepted every accusation of racism or sexism provided to it as evidence of America’s decline after electing President Donald Trump.

    But even before the election, the discredited “anti-hate” group was sounding the alarm on any story that could be used against Trump before waiting for the actual details. On November 2, 2016, the SPLC’s “Hatewatch Staff” posted a story titled “Authorities Suspect Voter Intimidation in Burning, Vandalism of Mississippi Church.”

    The article was about the Hopewell Missionary Baptist Church being set on fire and the words “Vote Trump” spray-painted on the side of the building. SPLC also mentioned this incident in its massive list of alleged hate crimes following Trump’s election (the vast majority of which were allegations from people reaching out to SPLC without providing a shred of evidence for their claims).

https://www.weaselzippers.us/416048-mississippi-man-pleads-guilty-to-hate-crime-hoax-splc-used-to-slam-trump/

[Sanguine]

The article was about the Hopewell Missionary Baptist Church being set on fire and the words “Vote Trump” spray-painted on the side of the building.

Because, in order to convince people to vote for Trump, you paint "Vote Trump" on their church and then try to burn it down?

[GtHawk]

Because, in order to convince people to vote for Trump, you paint "Vote Trump" on their church and then try to burn it down?

No, no it was voter intimidation ya see, the threat was vote Trump or your church will get burned down.............er, um, the guy knew there was something wrong in his instructions but just couldn't figure out what.

[goatprairie]

Modern technology, including video, DNA, and other things, has allowed investigative authorities to discover and expost many hoaxes in the last twenty years.
So how many of these hoaxes  that obviously were occurring before the modern methods of detection were used have not been exposed?
Considering the high percentage of hoaxes in the last twenty years, I'd say that puts the doubt on many instances of hate crime claims previous to modern technology.