NBC/MSNBC political news honcho accused of trying to suppress news on behalf of the DNC

[rangerrebew]

March 30, 2019
NBC/MSNBC political news honcho accused of trying to suppress news on behalf of the DNC
By Thomas Lifson

CNN and MSNBC, the two cable news networks currently in crisis over their pushing of the Russia hoax for years,  have another huge worry on their hands: they have been exposed as agents of the Democratic Party’s national leadership.  First CNN, and now MSNBC (as well as its parent, NBC News), have been shown to be acting on orders from the Democratic Party.

Tucker Carlson, under concerted attack by Media Matters and others seeking to drive him off the air, has broadcast devastating rebukes to the two corrupt networks for their conversion into adjuncts of a political party, not legitimate news operations. With so much skin in the game, Tucker has devoted major time to both stories, explaining their significance to his viewers. If you missed it, watch his Thursday night segment showing that when Nancy Pelosi commanded it, CNN changed its entire day’s programming to spout the line that the Democratic Party wanted.

Read more: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2019/03/nbcmsnbc_political_news_honcho_accused_of_trying_to_suppress_news_on_behalf_of_the_dnc.html#ixzz5jeVNb73m
 

[Snarknado]

The only surprising thing about this is that the DNC had to tell MSNBC to suppress a damaging story. If the editor couldn't figure that out on her own they never should have hired her in the first place.

Just as dems no longer see the need to play down their socialist wish list, they apparently no longer see any need to pretend that their media outlets like MSNBC, CNN, NYT, WaPo are independent news operations...

[mountaineer]

Here's the tweet about NBC representing the DNC's interests, via Twitter (condensed):

Yashar Ali  Verified account @yashar

1. Yesterday, I received a call from @DafnaLinzer who serves as managing editor of NBC/MSNBC politics. Dafna's conduct during the call was highly inappropriate and unethical. So what was the purpose of her call?
She called me to bully me on behalf of the DNC.
1:17 PM - 29 Mar 2019

2. Dafna, who oversees the political coverage for NBC and MSNBC, was calling to bully me into delaying the publication of an innocuous scoop and at no point did she advocate for her network, it was only about the DNC.

Here's how this all started...

3. Yesterday morning I received a tip from a trusted source. The source told me the DNC would be announcing the dates of the first 2020 primary debates later that day. The source gave me the dates they would be announcing: June 26 and 27.

4. At first I thought it was just a fun tidbit that I could tweet out. But after I called several presidential campaign staffers I learn that all the Dem campaigns were desperate to learn what the dates were going to be. I decided to post the scoop as an item in my newsletter.

5. This wasn't a huge scoop but it was a decent one so I quickly called the DNC to fact-check the tip as I was running out of time: the dates would be announced on MSNBC in the 4:00 PM hour. It's important to note that almost of all of my communication with the DNC was off record

6. So I won't share most of what was said but can tell you it's pretty run-of-the mill stuff. I asked the DNC if my tip was accurate and they asked if they could call me back in 10 minutes. A few minutes later they called back and asked if I could delay posting my scoop

7. For another hour so they could go through their important notification calls to the state parties. I told them I couldn't wait as the news would leak and leave me without a story. That's all I can say about the call. Two minutes later I received a call from Dafna.

8. I've never spoken to Dafna by phone. A couple years ago she reached out to me to see if I wanted to have coffee and talk about working at NBC News but I declined as I was actively investigating NBC matters and thought it would be strange if I discussed a job.

9. So when I saw Dafna calling I assumed she would ask me to consider delaying my post so that MSNBC could announce it first. Given that this was an innocuous scoop and not some investigative story I wouldn't have lost sleep if I had delayed. But that's not why she was calling.

10. After exchanging pleasantries, Dafna told me that she received a call from the DNC and was told I had a story. Now it's not strange that the DNC called her, they were coordinating an announcement. What was strange was that she was calling me and taking a menacing tone

11. She asked if I could hold the story and I said I couldn't. She was agitated, "why not?" I said I'm not going to lose a scoop. Then she got angrier and said "Why not? It's not a big deal, let them make a few phone calls."

My jaw dropped.

12. I realized that @DafnaLinzer, the head of all political coverage for NBC News and MSNBC wasn't calling to advocate for her network, she was calling to advocate the DNC's position. She wanted me to wait so they could call state party leaders.

13. I thought to myself "this is how people think it works." It's not. But Dafna was doing it. She kept pressing me. Now I acknowledged, for stuff that isn't about serious investigative reporting, there is no problem holding something. But I knew once others got the call

14. I would lose a scoop. Dafna reminded me she was a nat sec reporter at WAPO for ten years and they would hold stuff all the time (note: so people wouldn't get killed). "Why can't you just wait, let them make their calls, then you'll be the first to put it into print," she said

15. I couldn't believe what she was saying. Again, it was fine for me to print the story an hour later, beat her own network by three hours, she just wanted me to let the DNC inform state party leaders. Why the hell did she care?

16. I kept telling Dafna no, that I wasn't waiting. And she kept getting more frustrated. She was exasperated...she didn't understand why I couldn't wait for the DNC to make their state notification calls.

17. I was so surprised me that she was talking this way with a total stranger. The head of the political division was trying to bully me at the behest of the DNC over a dumb scoop (even though they may not have asked her to)

18. 2/3 of the way into the conversation Dafna started a sentence with "this is off the record." She hadn't said it at the beginning of our conversation and most important at no point did I agree when she said "off record" to keep it off record.

19. I'm not one of those gotcha reporters, I think it's bad for sourcing relationships to make people like they constantly feel like they have to say "off record." But Dafna isn't a source and she was calling to intimidate me, so she doesn't get the benefit.

20. She said "off record" one more time later in the call and again I just let her keep talking, I did not agree to anything. I then told her I had to go talk to my editor and she got even more frustrated and said "No. I want to talk to you about this."

21. I said "no, I want to go talk to my editor." Then she sent me over the edge and said "What's your editors name, I want to talk to them." She was trying to intimidate me..on behalf of the DNC. I ended the call.

22. After the call with Dafna I published the stupid scoop. Then I did a gut check and over the next two hours I called 10 experienced prominent reporters and told them the story. They were all stunned by what Dafna did and encouraged me to share it publicly.

23. I'm not naive to the fact that this incident is going to be twisted by some with an agenda to discredit the media and say they collude with political parties. But I think its more important to expose bad behavior then keep it under wraps. What Dafna did was unethical

24. There are plenty of times reporters will introduce people in politics to other reporters or TV people. I have done it many times, that is advocating for more coverage, not less. Dafna was advocating for me to not do something on behalf of a political party.

25. What I can't figure out is (and no one else I spoke to could understand), why open yourself up to this for a stupid story? How was this worth it?

[rangerrebew]

BREAKING: NBC Political Editor Accused of Bullying HuffPost Reporter on DNC's Behalf
By Tim Graham | March 29, 2019 2:39 PM EDT

Yashar Ali of HuffPost published an eye-opening thread on Twitter Friday accusing an NBC/MSNBC political editor of "bullying him" on behalf of the Democratic National Committee to delay an "innocuous" debate-schedule scoop he'd been given. Ali began:

    Yesterday, I received a call from @DafnaLinzer who serves as managing editor of NBC/MSNBC politics. Dafna's conduct during the call was highly inappropriate and unethical. So what was the purpose of her

    She called me to bully me on behalf of the DNC.
 

Source URL: https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/tim-graham/2019/03/29/breaking-nbc-political-editor-accused-bullying-huffpost-reporter-dncs

[aligncare]

Sean riffed on this on Friday’s show. It shows perhaps the clearest example of DNC—Big Media collusion that we’ve seen to date.

Trump did this. The way he’s rattled the press and democrats has been nothing less than masterful. His win of the presidency set the media’s hatred of the Right into hyperdrive. They’ve gotten sloppy with blind rage and they don’t even care anymore, such is their hatred for Donald Trump.

But, make no mistake. It was Donald John Trump, the president of the United States, that ripped off the media’s fake veil of objectivity and revealed the partisanship underneath.

Sometimes the call to fight gets answered by a glitzy guy from Queens. So, say his name like you would Ronald Wilson Reagan. Because Trump’s presidency has been that significant in the defense of American democracy.

[Mod1]

Merged threads

[Right_in_Virginia]

Sean riffed on this on Friday’s show. It shows perhaps the clearest example of DNC—Big Media collusion that we’ve seen to date.

Trump did this. The way he’s rattled the press and democrats has been nothing less than masterful. His win of the presidency set the media’s hatred of the Right into hyperdrive. They’ve gotten sloppy with blind rage and they don’t even care anymore, such is their hatred for Donald Trump.

But, make no mistake. It was Donald John Trump, the president of the United States, that ripped off the media’s fake veil of objectivity and revealed the partisanship underneath.

Sometimes the call to fight gets answered by a glitzy guy from Queens. So, say his name like you would Ronald Wilson Reagan. Because Trump’s presidency has been that significant in the defense of American democracy.

Excellent  post @aligncare   

[Maj. Bill Martin]

Sometimes the call to fight gets answered by a glitzy guy from Queens. So, say his name like you would Ronald Wilson Reagan. Because Trump’s presidency has been that significant in the defense of American democracy.

I wouldn't elevate Trump to the moral stature of Reagan -- Reagan had more class in a pinkie than does Trump in his whole body.  But class isn't the most important quality for a President to possess, and your third sentence is dead on.  Trump has succeeded in exposing the true antidemocratic malevolence of the left in a way Reagan couldn't -- probably because they just weren't as brazen then as they are now.  And in an era where political correctness has so infected public discourse that the mere discussion of some issues is deemed offensive, we needed a guy who didn't care who he offended.  He's rude, crass, and crude.  But I'll gladly take all of that because as Lincoln said about Grant, we "can't spare this man.  He fights."

[dfwgator]

I wouldn't elevate Trump to the moral stature of Reagan -- Reagan had more class in a pinkie than does Trump in his whole body.   

Maybe so, but a lot has changed since Reagan's time.   There are new rules.