A pre-viable fetus in within the purview and control of the woman, not the State.
Did you know that fetus is just Latin for baby? So your distinction is without a difference... And the child is viable all the way along if you leave it alone.
And no, according to our law, our rights are not in the control of either - But rather, in the hands of the Creator. So the life of that child is sacrosanct, and neither the woman, nor the state, has the impetus to curtail it - I's fate is in the hands of a higher court.
And if that is not true, then of a necessity, you are denying that the rights of men are endowed by the Creator, and the whole of our law, and the very existence and establishment of this nation, is in vain.
Make your moral arguments based on your religious belief in the fetus' soul and personhood [...]
Mine is not a religious argument. Mine is an argument of law. There are only two means by which this government at any level can sanction death. By just cause or by due process - state sanctioned abortion is neither one, and thereby outside of the limits placed upon this government, and that by definition is a breach of liberty.
But ultimately, the woman's inherent LIBERTY means it's her choice to make
It is not her liberty. She is inevitably unaffected and un-violated... Her responsibility can end in a mere 9 months.
It is the child's liberty that is violated. That child's right to life is forever extinguished.