This is dishearening as, other than Clarence Thomas, none have been stronger on Consitutional conservatism on the Court than Alito.
Digging into this a bit more, it appears that during her short stint with NAWL, Liu did not serve on the committee who produced that opposition to Alito. It remains unclear whether her leadership role in NAWL gave her an opportunity to voice objection to the organization's objections to Alito.
One of the association’s committees in 2006 evaluated Samuel Alito Jr.’s nomination to the U.S. Supreme Court and rated him “not qualified from a women’s rights perspective.†Alito, the committee said in a statement then, “has shown a disinclination to protect or advance women’s rights.†The committee said one of its primary concerns was “Alito’s stance on women’s reproductive rights†and that Alito would be replacing Sandra Day O’Connor, “who has been a decisive vote in a number of cases involving the rights of women and laws that have special impact on women.†The evaluation committee, selected by the president of the lawyers’ group, included law professors, appellate lawyers and litigators. A Justice Department spokesperson said Wednesday afternoon that Liu was not on the committee that evaluated Alito and she did not have any role in the evaluation.https://www.law.com/nationallawjournal/2019/03/06/jessie-lius-women-lawyers-group-opposed-alito-and-5-other-things-to-know/She left the organization's leadership role the same year of the Alito objection, so it could even be she did not like it.
I do hope she talks about her role in all of this, though.