Then your opinion is the Constitution is meaningless and we have no basis for discussion.
I have a far more realistic view of the stakes than you do. But go on, keep on believing the myth that the 2A preserves your right to assemble an arsenal to shoot elected officials when our Republic provides for a perfectly reasonable mechanism for voting the bums out.
Heller was a brilliant decision grounded in the same view of the Constitution's purpose to protect our natural rights that animated Roe v. Wade. You have the natural right to protect your person, family and property, not to circumvent the results of elections by violent overthrow of the government. This isn't King George, this isn't an unwilling colony of a foreign power, this is a self-governing Constitutional Republic. The 2A's original purpose is obsolete and functionally meaningless.
What's left is the Heller decision's use of the 2A to establish the individual RKBA. The decision is Constitutionally sound, but was opposed by four Justices who read no such individual right into the 2A, let alone the Constitution's "penumbras and eminations". The Heller decision - YOUR Constitutional rights - are as fragile as, well, the right to abortion. You hate and oppose with all your political might a woman's right to choose? Then understand fully that liberals hate with equal passion the decision of "unelected judges" to secure your right to keep your family safe.