New Jersey: Imam says Muslims should reject “freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom of the

[rangerrebew]

New Jersey: Imam says Muslims should reject “freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom of the press”

Feb 8, 2019 12:26 pm By Robert Spencer 2 Comments

Mateen Khan also explains how the “clever” Jews fooled the Europeans into thinking they were “one of them.” Does Mateen Khan believe in violent jihad, and that non-Muslims should be subjugated under Islamic law as dhimmis, and that Sharia should ultimately replace the U.S. Constitution? What do you think?

“NJ-Based Imam Mateen Khan: Liberals Are Trying To Force Muslims To Adopt Liberalism And To Allow Them To Insult Muhammad; The Jews Convinced The Europeans To Hate The Arabs Instead Of Them,” MEMRI, December 30, 2018:

https://www.jihadwatch.org/2019/02/new-jersey-imam-says-muslims-should-reject-freedom-of-speech-freedom-of-religion-freedom-of-the-press

[rangerrebew]

This is the REAL Islam.

[XenaLee]

New Jersey: Imam says Muslims should reject “freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom of the press”

Feb 8, 2019 12:26 pm By Robert Spencer 2 Comments

Mateen Khan also explains how the “clever” Jews fooled the Europeans into thinking they were “one of them.” Does Mateen Khan believe in violent jihad, and that non-Muslims should be subjugated under Islamic law as dhimmis, and that Sharia should ultimately replace the U.S. Constitution? What do you think?

“NJ-Based Imam Mateen Khan: Liberals Are Trying To Force Muslims To Adopt Liberalism And To Allow Them To Insult Muhammad; The Jews Convinced The Europeans To Hate The Arabs Instead Of Them,” MEMRI, December 30, 2018:

https://www.jihadwatch.org/2019/02/new-jersey-imam-says-muslims-should-reject-freedom-of-speech-freedom-of-religion-freedom-of-the-press

Ah yes.... let's all blame da Jooos for the hatred, barbarity, misogyny, fascism and bigotry that the radical Islamists all display.   Cause... you know... it could never ever be the fault of the radical Muslims!   

[Fishrrman]

Once again, here is one more reason why we need to change this:
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

To this:
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. The followers of muhammed are specifically excluded and denied the protections of this amendment along with any and all other Constitutional protections. Neither the United States nor the Several States will offer such protections or liberties to the followers of muhammed."