@Smokin Joe @Bigun
This is so fallacious and embarrassing. There’s a huge difference between direct associates or employees and people in the general public with whom you may have incidental contact. You both know it. Also, whataboutism is not a defense for another person’s actions. If you want to know where the Clinton swat team is, ask Trump why he considered them to be ‘good people who had suffered enough,’ after the election.
Then tell me how this dog and pony show (New, improved, with GUNS!) is justified.
Andh how Hillary hasn't been the 'guest of Honor' at one of these?
Obstruction?
Destroying evidence?
egregious violations of the law?
You'd think they were running an overstock special on that stuff at the CLinton Camp.
You might not think whataboutism applies, so how about Equal Protection under the law?
And I'd wager form the guys who sweep the floor right to the top, if you dig hard enough, with a powerful enough microscope, You'd find prosecutable dirt on anyone--and if you put them in the hot seat over a few days or just hours and ask them the same questions under oath, sooner or later they will say something that will put them up on charges.
As for Mueller, he and Comey are old hands when it comes to witch hunts, and they don't let go of whoever is the person they have decided to convict, no matter what the evidence says.
http://thefederalist.com/2018/02/08/robert-mueller-botching-investigations-since-anthrax-attacks/ https://www.genengnews.com/news/comey-mueller-and-anthrax/Do I honestly believe that there would be suppression of Brady Material, despite the law? Yep.
So, frankly, I'm seeing an absence of pursuit or prosecution of egregious and admitted crimes, including writing the report exonerating Clinton when the investigation was still in progress...
And dogged pursuit of any hair out of place with other, politically targeted people. The problem is that there appears to be partisan bias in those results.
