Larry Schweikart
8 hrs ·
People are clamoring for a Declaration of Emergency to build the wall. Not a good idea.
First, a Hawaiian judge will immediately put a stay on this and rule it's unconstitutional.
Now, the US Supreme Court would likely NOT take it up in any kind of expedited way. So we're looking at a year, minimum---but the Supreme Court COULD lift the stay.
However, that would require John Roberts to vote the right way. Raise your hand if you trust Roberts.
What could happen is that the stay remains in place and then NOTHING happens. Meanwhile, Congress, absolved of all funding responsibility by the Declaration of Emergency, would not take up ANY funding of the border or wall, saying, "That's being litigated. Wait for the Court decision."
If Trump proceeds to try to build in defiance of a judge's stay, the House would immediately impeach and, because it's an obvious violation of a judicial order, the Senate vote to remove would be a lot closer than you may think.
Right now I think Minion, Sasshole, MurCowSki, Tom Collins, and probably Isaackson would vote to remove, giving the Ds 53. They would be short, but you still have Burrito, Mel Tillis, the retiring Alexander, Jodi Ernst, Gardner, and possibly McSally. Now your'e at 59 and in range. Not saying removal would be likely, but that it would be a lot closer than people think under the circumstances I've outlined.
Moreover, what people do NOT understand---especially the dicknipples at National Review and boobs like Ann Coulter and Ben Shapiro---is that Trump is the most FEDERALIST president we've had at least since Reagan. He said DACA was not something for an executive order, that Congress had to fix it. Same with this. This is an appropriation that Congress needs to make and Trump does not want to violate the separation of powers. Believe it or not, he has been really good about observing that.