The problem here with Natural News and articles like this is they see your lights on and tell you it is on fire. They make people fear the mundane and harmless.
That doesn't change a thing about SV-40, Thimoserol, or squalenes in vaccines.
I am not anti vaccine, but there are risks, however small.
That those risks are small (statistically) doesn't preclude one from becoming the 'lucky winner' and having an adverse reaction or effects from a vaccine. After all, some people do, or there would be nothing to discuss. So, weigh the odds, consider the 'herd immunity' effect, exposure likelihood (increased with the third world coming to your door) and consider whether the threat justifies the risk. (If you live in the upper Midwest, do you really need that dengue fever shot?)
There are calm, well paid voices on one side, saying "It's safe", and for the most part they are right.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4599698/Do the research, and don't ignore the warnings just because someone you regard as the internet idiot happened to pen (yet another) article on the adulterants (adjuvants) used to manufacture, preserve, and stretch vaccine supplies, or contaminants present in the stocks of vaccines.
Have you noticed how peanut allergies seem far more common than they were just a few decades ago?
Peanut oil was used as a squalene, a substance added to a vaccine in order to prompt a more serious immune reaction to the biological antigen present to promote antibody development with less of the specific antigen present. It's a cheap, quick, way to stretch vaccine stocks, but now we have armies of kids who would experience severe anaphylactic shock from a peanut--serious enough that some venues (schools) don't even allow PBJs from home for fear some kid will die on them in the lunchroom. You just didn't see that 40 years ago.
Don't dismiss the science because of the source, at least check it out.
https://thinkingmomsrevolution.com/whats-really-behind-peanut-allergy-epidemic/ Then make up your own mind.
As for SV-40, this stuff is real, SV-40 contaminated many of the Polio Vaccines, and it was known to be in the stocks, but the overwhelming fear of Polio prompted the deployment of those vaccines anyway, seen as the more immediate and greater risk (polio was epidemic at the time). However, an admission of wrong comes with a hefty price tag. So the vaccine producers aren't talking. It's still in there.
Don't listen to Natural News, then. How about NIH?
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC452549/The purpose of vaccines is to prevent epidemic. In the calculus of public health, while not a preferred outcome, the loss of a few unfortunates is acceptable when protecting the vast majority from a likely (and devastating) epidemic. Much like animal husbandry, if you are going to lose a couple of head of cattle from the vaccine, but save the herd from a disease, they get the shots.
There are shrill voices on both sides, but that doesn't mean there is no there there. You don't have to believe that an industry as lucrative as the Pharmaceutical industry has a motive in finding no problems, while there are those who have suffered injury will try to pin blame wherever, especially on deep pocket targets.
NIH is about as unbiased a source as I can come up with, and although there might be pressure there to not find problems, even they did.
Remember the story of
The Boy Who Cried Wolf?
Yeah, he got eaten.