Votes were counted "in order of preference" with first place being the earliest vote in sequence.
Results were posted with first place being the last posted (aka the opposite order).
And I'm called a stupid democrat for pointing out that "in order of preference" is ambiguous.
Guess you won't give up...like the MSM still defending the Buzzfeed bombshell or their Covington Catholic fiasco...
The ballots were asked for in order of preference for the final round in order to assign correct point values to each selection.
There was no statement made re the order in which the results would be posted. For effect, they were posted the same way they have been for the last 10 years.
For the record, I know you're much smarter than a Democrat since you're on this site ;-)