Author Topic: Dred Scott? Seriously?  (Read 305 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

rangerrebew

  • Guest
Dred Scott? Seriously?
« on: December 22, 2018, 02:16:10 pm »
Dred Scott? Seriously?
By John C. Eastman| July 26th, 2018


The radical Left’s resort to ad hominem attacks and allegations of “racism” against their political opponents has become so commonplace that the charges have become virtually meaningless. Apparently, the open-borders Right now thinks that by joining the catcalls, they can resurrect some of the old sting.

How else to explain the recent spate of scurrilous charges leveled against Michael Anton for daring to state that the 14th Amendment—as the Supreme Court itself has recognized—does not mandate automatic citizenship to children born on U.S. soil to parents who owe their allegiance to a foreign sovereign. Anton is anti-Black, anti-Asian, and anti-Hispanic—indeed, anti all non-white people—and even wants to restore the infamous holding in Dred Scott, claims The Federalist’s Robert Tracinski. He wraps himself in the flag “while loathing the republic for which it stands,” asserts Bill Kristol. His argument “is an offensive dumpster fire,” adds David Marcus, also at The Federalist.


https://amgreatness.com/2018/07/26/dred-scott-seriously/

Oceander

  • Guest
Re: Dred Scott? Seriously?
« Reply #1 on: December 22, 2018, 02:17:16 pm »
Where has the Supreme Court “recognized” that the 14th Amendment does not say what it says?

Offline IsailedawayfromFR

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,752
Re: Dred Scott? Seriously?
« Reply #2 on: December 22, 2018, 02:21:15 pm »
Where has the Supreme Court “recognized” that the 14th Amendment does not say what it says?
If a law says what it says, why need any courts at all?

We can all interpret what it says ourselves, can't we?
No punishment, in my opinion, is too great, for the man who can build his greatness upon his country's ruin~  George Washington