His conclusion was that women lied about wanting sensitive, caring, humble males when most of them really desired powerful, arrogant, males.
In short, they desired the male who stepped on everybody over the male who was meek and submissive and sensitive to women.
I don't think that's right. I was a very physically powerful male, and capable of extreme aggression. It was not unusual for someone I laid hands on to wind up in the hospital. So I am well accustomed to the meat-seeking bunnies that look for the most powerful man in the room.
I have been everything from dead broke to a regional leader in business. So I have also experienced the gold diggers that come with money and business/political power.
If you winnow through the shallow women, I think that true women are looking for a powerful protector, sure... and for smeone with some sort of success (depending upon her particular view of success - not necessarily money or power)...
I read somewhere that a gentleman is not a simp with a limp wrist, but rather, a gentleman is made of spring steel, entirely capable and confident, deferring not because he must, but because he chooses to. Not an arrogant lord, but a benevolent one - Not making men bow to his will, but leading by example.
I think that is where the money shot lies.