Author Topic: Does the U.S. Military Really Need More Strategists?  (Read 240 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

rangerrebew

  • Guest
Does the U.S. Military Really Need More Strategists?
« on: November 10, 2018, 12:36:17 pm »

Does the U.S. Military Really Need More Strategists?
James Joyner
November 8, 2018
 

Former National War College dean and retired Brig. Gen. Paula Thornhill should be commended for kicking off a vigorous round of debate on professional military education institutions in July. Many of my objections to her argument have been ably expressed by others, notably my Marine Corps University colleague Tammy Schultz as well as Richard Andres of the National War College. But none have questioned Thornhill’s central premise: that professional military education needs to produce more strategists. Indeed, several, most notably Tino Perez, have amplified it.

The U.S. military doesn’t need to produce thousands of strategists a year, which is a good thing because it cannot. Further, while the professional military education system is a vital part of educating strategic thinkers, the primary obstacle to producing strategic leaders is a personnel system that bases promotions on tactical competence over the first quarter century of an officer’s career.

https://warontherocks.com/2018/11/does-the-u-s-military-really-need-more-strategists/