Author Topic: Analyzing H.R. 7059, the 'Build the Wall, Enforce the Law Act of 2018'  (Read 481 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

rangerrebew

  • Guest
Analyzing H.R. 7059, the 'Build the Wall, Enforce the Law Act of 2018'

By Dan Cadman on November 2, 2018


It took several days after House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) publicly announced introduction of a new bill to fund the border barrier and implement important immigration measures before the text of the proposed legislation became available.

The bill McCarthy announced was the "Build the Wall, Enforce the Law Act of 2018", H.R. 7059,1 which was described in the media as a "new get-tough immigration bill that would build the rest of President Trump's border wall, punish sanctuary cities and stiffen penalties on repeat illegal immigrants."2

The legislative language of the bill may not completely live up to its media depiction, but there are a number of extremely desirable law enforcement provisions crafted into the bill. Other features are desirable, but flawed as written and merit amendment to ensure that they have the effect intended. A few appear to be a step backward.

Following is a brief analysis.

https://cis.org/Report/Analyzing-HR-7059-Build-Wall-Enforce-Law-Act-2018
« Last Edit: November 03, 2018, 01:13:27 pm by rangerrebew »

Offline Chosen Daughter

  • For there is no respect of persons with God. Romans 10:12-13
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,890
  • Gender: Female
  • Ephesians 6:13 Stand Firm in the face of evil
Re: Analyzing H.R. 7059, the 'Build the Wall, Enforce the Law Act of 2018'
« Reply #1 on: November 04, 2018, 03:46:11 am »
Analyzing H.R. 7059, the 'Build the Wall, Enforce the Law Act of 2018'

By Dan Cadman on November 2, 2018


It took several days after House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) publicly announced introduction of a new bill to fund the border barrier and implement important immigration measures before the text of the proposed legislation became available.

The bill McCarthy announced was the "Build the Wall, Enforce the Law Act of 2018", H.R. 7059,1 which was described in the media as a "new get-tough immigration bill that would build the rest of President Trump's border wall, punish sanctuary cities and stiffen penalties on repeat illegal immigrants."2

The legislative language of the bill may not completely live up to its media depiction, but there are a number of extremely desirable law enforcement provisions crafted into the bill. Other features are desirable, but flawed as written and merit amendment to ensure that they have the effect intended. A few appear to be a step backward.

Following is a brief analysis.

https://cis.org/Report/Analyzing-HR-7059-Build-Wall-Enforce-Law-Act-2018

Removes funding for sanctuary cities,...........unless the state has a sanctuary city law?
AG William Barr: "I'm recused from that matter because one of the law firms that represented Epstein long ago was a firm that I subsequently joined for a period of time."

Alexander Acosta Labor Secretary resigned under pressure concerning his "sweetheart deal" with Jeffrey Epstein.  He was under consideration for AG after Sessions was removed, but was forced to resign instead.