Eternal Jihad: Islam Will Never, Ever Stop

[rangerrebew]

October 23, 2018
Eternal Jihad: Islam Will Never, Ever Stop
By Andrew E. Harrod

The "West and Islam have been mortal enemies since the latter's birth some fourteen centuries ago," warns Islam scholar Raymond Ibrahim in his recent book Sword and Scimitar:  Fourteen Centuries of War between Islam and the West.  His extensive analysis bears out the apt title of this volume, whose documented history is equally ill remembered and yet vital for modern Westerners.

Ibrahim begins by elucidating the disturbing conceptual core of Islam and its seventh-century Arab prophet, Muhammad.  "The appeal of Muhammad's message lay in its compatibility with the tribal mores of his society," Ibrahim notes. 

Read more: https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2018/10/eternal_jihad_islam_will_never_ever_stop.html#ixzz5UkmfY7LY

[Absalom]

Islam is marginally a religion; instead a militant ideology bound
by Sharia Law and intolerant of dissent as well as personal freedom.

[Sanguine]

Islam is marginally a religion; instead a militant ideology bound
by Sharia Law and intolerant of dissent as well as personal freedom.

Well said.

[Fishrrman]

Absalom wrote (very, very well):
"Islam is marginally a religion; instead a militant ideology bound
by Sharia Law and intolerant of dissent as well as personal freedom."

OK, then. Very well.
But I'm going to ask you a question:

Would you support changing this:
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

To this:
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. The followers of muhammed are specifically excluded and denied the protections of this amendment along with any and all other Constitutional protections. Neither the United States nor the Several States will offer such protections or liberties to the followers of muhammed."

?????

[Absalom]

Absalom wrote (very, very well):
"Islam is marginally a religion; instead a militant ideology bound
by Sharia Law and intolerant of dissent as well as personal freedom."

OK, then. Very well.
But I'm going to ask you a question:

Would you support changing this:
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

To this:
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. The followers of muhammed are specifically excluded and denied the protections of this amendment along with any and all other Constitutional protections. Neither the United States nor the Several States will offer such protections or liberties to the followers of muhammed."
?????

----------------------------------
The label conservative is applied and claimed endlessly on TBR.
Two wise Englishmen, Burke and Hume, asserted that conservative
principles are derived from the Natural Law.
As such they are independent of and not needy of either politics or
religion for support; which I completely agree with.