Are you saying the cost of maintaining roads shouldn't be borne by those who use roads? You want to spread the costs to those who don't, or just pass the buck to the next generation?
It is entirely consistent with conservatism to fund a legitimate expense of government both currently and by levies targeted to those who make use of roads.
Well let's talk about California, which I am sure is not atypical, we already paid a heavy gas tax which the democraps(I include Schwartzhole) played three card monty shuffling to other places to shore up their socialist programs instead of the roads. Then there are the Hybrids that weigh just as much as a conventional car causing just as much wear and tear on the roads as conventional cars and of course use less gas so don't pay their fair share........on top of being subsidized by the taxpayer. Then of course there are the electric vehicle that the Gaia worshipers love to claim are zero emission, which again are just as heavy as conventional gas vehicles, and they pay no share at all for maintaining the roads, are subsidized by the taxpayer and in many case are supplied with
free electricity at public charging stations paid for by........surprise, the taxpayer.
Now governor Moonbeam and his socialista democrats laid another huge gas tax on California for...........INFRASTRUCTURE! (my ass) while not addressing the Gaia worshippers driving Hybrids and EV's and throwing billions into social programs for illegals and a bullet train to nowhere.
I guess we'll see what the public will tolerate after the election and the measure to tell Moonbeam and his posse to shove his gas tax into the dark side of the moon.
Me I'm fed up to the gills with do gooders telling me to fork over more and more .........for the children...........for the roads.............for the Earth........kill Em All and Let God Sort it out. I want the America I grew up in Back not the
ified country the flower children and socialists have turned it into.