On The New Yorker’s Grossly Irresponsible StoryBy CHARLES C. W. COOKE
September 24, 2018 8:02 AM
Judge Kavanaugh labels The New Yorker’s report a “smear, plain and simple.†He should be applauded for his restraint. I am struggling to remember reading a less responsible piece of “journalism†in a major outlet.
The piece starts out not with a summary of the story, but with the news that Democrats in Washington are taking it seriously — a weaselly attempt to pass the buck if I ever saw one (“People are saying!â€). After that throat clearing, it is acknowledged that the person making the accusation around which the piece revolves had not mentioned it until Kavanaugh was nominated, “was reluctant to characterize Kavanaugh’s role in the alleged incident with certainty,†and agreed to make the charge on the record only after she had spent “six days [] carefully assessing her memories and consulting with her attorney.â€
There are no corroborating witnesses. None. Of the “dozens†of classmates The New Yorker contacted, all either failed “to respond to interview requests . . . declined to comment, or said they did not attend or remember the party.†Indeed, we learn late in the piece that the authors could not establish that Kavanaugh was even there. “The New Yorker,†the tenth paragraph begins, “has not confirmed with other eyewitnesses that Kavanaugh was present at the party.†The only “evidence†provided comes from a “classmate†who was not at the party, but is certain he heard about the incident, and from “another classmate†who thinks he heard about an incident that could vaguely resemble the one alleged, but doesn’t know to whom it was done, or by whom. Or, as we would traditionally put it: The only proof provided is rumor.
https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/on-the-new-yorkers-grossly-irresponsible-story/
