60 former CIA officials sign letter condemning Trump's treatment of Brennan

[XenaLee]

Both parties suck.  figure it out.

That graphic is bullshit.   By that logic.... the Democrats are more "accurate" and logical than Republicans.  Pure BS! 

[Blizzardnh]

Both parties suck.  figure it out.

So you defend a commie because both parties suck. Get real look up the guys history.That cartoon says a lot about you too.

[Wingnut]

This American president wants to succeed where his limp wristed predecessors failed.   And damnit, if that means abandoning traditional diplomacy in favor of ill-concealed contempt towards so called allies abroad or deep state swamp creatures like the subject Moslum of this post... so be it.  Piss on em.

[Blizzardnh]

This American president wants to succeed where his limp wristed predecessors failed.   And damnit, if that means abandoning traditional diplomacy in favor of ill-concealed contempt towards so called allies abroad or deep state swamp creatures like the subject Moslum of this post... so be it.  Piss on em.

[Formerly Once-Ler]

So you defend a commie because both parties suck. Get real look up the guys history.That cartoon says a lot about you too.

@Blizzardnh
Show me where I defended Brennan.  I have not.  I have only insulted Nectarine Nero and the cultists who sold their souls and burned their principles, integrity, and values in sacrifice to Trump.  Winning!!!

[Blizzardnh]

@Blizzardnh
Show me where I defended Brennan.  I have not.  I have only insulted Nectarine Nero and the cultists who sold their souls and burned their principles, integrity, and values in sacrifice to Trump.  Winning!!!

If you can't see it I can't help ya . I'll refer ya back to my first post.

[Formerly Once-Ler]

If you can't see it I can't help ya . I'll refer ya back to my first post.

Don't blame my eyesight if you can't 'splain it.

[To-Whose-Benefit?]

If you can't see it I can't help ya . I'll refer ya back to my first post.

 

[TomSea]

@Blizzardnh
Show me where I defended Brennan.  I have not.  I have only insulted Nectarine Nero and the cultists who sold their souls and burned their principles, integrity, and values in sacrifice to Trump.  Winning!!!

I'll bet Wisconsin/most states Right to Life supports Trump. That you don't see but anti-Trumpers seem to hang their hat again on all of this other.

[Maj. Bill Martin]

The only potential legitimate justification for former spooks keeping a security clearance is if the current Administration would want to give them access to classified information to seek their input on something.  But when you have someone as publicly and bitterly opposed to the Administration as is Brennan, there is zero chance of that happening because the Administration could not trust his advice. 

Therefore, his opposition to the Administration destroys the only justification for him keeping his clearance, and it should therefore be revoked.

[jpsb]

That graphic is bullshit.   By that logic.... the Democrats are more "accurate" and logical than Republicans.  Pure BS!

 

[Formerly Once-Ler]

I'll bet Wisconsin/most states Right to Life supports Trump. That you don't see but anti-Trumpers seem to hang their hat again on all of this other.

@TomSea 

[Formerly Once-Ler]

That graphic is bullshit.   By that logic.... the Democrats are more "accurate" and logical than Republicans.  Pure BS!

From my perspective the GOP used to be right and the rats have been consistently wrong...but get angry over a cartoon.  @XenaLee

[DB]

The only potential legitimate justification for former spooks keeping a security clearance is if the current Administration would want to give them access to classified information to seek their input on something.  But when you have someone as publicly and bitterly opposed to the Administration as is Brennan, there is zero chance of that happening because the Administration could not trust his advice. 

Therefore, his opposition to the Administration destroys the only justification for him keeping his clearance, and it should therefore be revoked.

Well stated.

[XenaLee]

From my perspective the GOP used to be right and the rats have been consistently wrong...but get angry over a cartoon.  @XenaLee

But... in the graphic, it portrays the rats as being perceptively correct then and now..... while the Republicans are portrayed as right then, wrong 'now'.  If any party has literally gone 'off the rails' re: perception, it's the Democrats.

Who's angry?  I just call it like I see it.  Always have and likely always will.  (can't change now)

[XenaLee]

The only potential legitimate justification for former spooks keeping a security clearance is if the current Administration would want to give them access to classified information to seek their input on something.  But when you have someone as publicly and bitterly opposed to the Administration as is Brennan, there is zero chance of that happening because the Administration could not trust his advice. 

Therefore, his opposition to the Administration destroys the only justification for him keeping his clearance, and it should therefore be revoked.

Damn, dude... you stated it perfectly.   

[RetBobbyMI]

How would you prove that?  You didn't bother to look up any of their records, but why bother when you can make allegations out of ignorance like the President?

Don’t need! Anyone who makes any outrageous statement that anyone is “entitled” to a clearance is clearly deep state and/or a Beltway bandit.

[Formerly Once-Ler]

Don’t need! Anyone who makes any outrageous statement that anyone is “entitled” to a clearance is clearly deep state and/or a Beltway bandit.

@RetBobbyMI Do you understand what "quotes" mean?  It means that word “entitled” should appear somewhere on this thread or in a statement by the CIA officials we are talking about.  Unless truth isn't truth, and you can make reckless allegations out of ignorance like the President and nobody will care because of Trump.