Ninth Circuit allows Mexican citizens to sue American Border Patrol agents #ninthcircus #immigration

[Free Vulcan]

John Moore | Getty Images

Just when you thought the stolen sovereignty and erasing of our borders by the Ninth Circuit couldn’t get worse, well, another court opinion comes out.

It’s bad enough that foreign nationals can invade our border, make demands on our agents, demand welfare, demand schooling, be counted in the Census, and claim citizenship for their children. Now foreign nationals can sue our border agents for doing their jobs and protecting us from the perils they foist upon our brave men and women.

In another case of a GOP-appointed judge siding with the most radical legal theories of the Left, Ninth Circuit Judge Andrew Kleinfeld ruled earlier last week that border agent Lonnie Swartz is not covered by qualified immunity, thereby allowing a Mexican woman to sue him for shooting her teenage son during border violence in 2012. In this decision, the court begins to control our foreign policy and military policy and paves the way for family members of Mexicans involved in drug cartels and cross-border violence to shut down our border security even further...

https://www.conservativereview.com/news/ninth-circuit-allows-mexican-citizens-to-sue-american-border-patrol-agents/

[Timothy Dennis]

Where is Eugene McCarthy when you need him? The Leftist Indoctrination of our culture, via our universities and colleges has born fruit. The Left-wing ideology of "everything goes and whatever and whomever is the more weird and insulting to God is to be preferred" and the least common denominator should rule is coming home to roost in our land. Where is sanity? The perverted and weirdlings  of the Left are attempting to silence Conservative voices, as we have recently witnessed in the media. Stand tall and strong conservatives; God has defended his Children and His Bible time and again through the most difficult times. God will not fail us, but we must be sure to stand strong for Him, as we are His Hands and Heart in our world.

[Emjay]

This is just another case of an over-reaching liberal judge trying to make policy.

I wish we could just get rid of all judges appointed by previous administrations but, sadly, it will be a slow process.

[endicom]

Looks like the 9th Barnum & Bailey is making law again.

[Wingnut]

This is just another case of an over-reaching liberal judge trying to make policy.

I wish we could just get rid of all judges appointed by previous administrations but, sadly, it will be a slow process.

That is exactly what they did.  They even said so (in Bold below)

In allowing the civil lawsuit to proceed, the 9th Circuit judges also sought to give new context to a legal precedent in the U.S. Supreme Court's 1971 ruling in Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics. The landmark Bivens case covered the actions of federal agents who were found to have violated constitutional protections, but it did not involve a cross-border action.

As they invoked Bivens in the current case, Kleinfeld and Judge Edward Korman said in the majority opinion that they did so because "no other adequate remedy was available."

We just be making shit up because well just because that is the way the 9th Circus rolls in a monkey shit fight against the Constitution.

[sneakypete]

There HAS to be some legal way to remove those anti-American fools from the bench.

[libertybele]

There HAS to be some legal way to remove those anti-American fools from the bench.

Only legal way I know of is through the ballot box.

[Bigun]

There HAS to be some legal way to remove those anti-American fools from the bench.

There is!  It's called impeachment but good luck getting our feckless Congress to do that. 

[Bigun]

Only legal way I know of is through the ballot box.

@libertybelle

Neither you or anyone else other than a member of the US Senate has ever voted for ANY federal judge. 

[sneakypete]

Only legal way I know of is through the ballot box.

@libertybele

They are appointed,not elected.

[libertybele]

@libertybelle

Neither you or anyone else other than a member of the US Senate has ever voted for ANY federal judge.

I stand corrected...I was thinking of voting to retain.

[240B]

GIVE CALIFORNIA TO MEXICO!
Who gives a shit. We will better of without them.

[Chosen Daughter]

There HAS to be some legal way to remove those anti-American fools from the bench.

Strike down these rulings as unconstitutional.  What basis for these rulings against American Constitution and laws?  He isn't a judge he is a social engineer.

[Suppressed]

GIVE CALIFORNIA TO MEXICO!
Who gives a shit. We will better of without them.

California produces a sizable majority of many American fruits, vegetables, and nuts: 99 percent of artichokes, 99 percent of walnuts, 97 percent of kiwis, 97 percent of plums, 95 percent of celery, 95 percent of garlic, 89 percent of cauliflower, 71 percent of spinach, and 69 percent of carrots (and the list goes on and on). Some of this is due to climate and soil. No other state, or even a combination of states, can match California’s output per acre.

Source

In fact, other areas couldn't make up the difference, as that yield difference is so huge, it requires far more acreage per ton of food than other replacement areas.

And a large part of the remainder of our produce comes from Mexico.

So they'd hold us by the nuts.  Walnuts, I mean.


This isn't even considering all of the other economics.  For example, the large oil output, economic output, port access, etc.

And California is toward the bottom of federal dependency, sending more to the federal government than it gets in return.
 
It would be devastating.

[Fishrrman]

Emjay wrote:
"I wish we could just get rid of all judges appointed by previous administrations but, sadly, it will be a slow process."

O'er in West Virginia, they be tryin' to do just that...!

[Sanguine]

Can we sue the Ninth Circuit? 

[sneakypete]

Source

In fact, other areas couldn't make up the difference, as that yield difference is so huge, it requires far more acreage per ton of food than other replacement areas.

And a large part of the remainder of our produce comes from Mexico.

So they'd hold us by the nuts.  Walnuts, I mean.


This isn't even considering all of the other economics.  For example, the large oil output, economic output, port access, etc.

And California is toward the bottom of federal dependency, sending more to the federal government than it gets in return.
 
It would be devastating.

@Suppressed

Sounds like a solid theory until someone asks the question,"How are they going to feed all their revolutionary foot soldiers of they don't sell their produce to us at a price we are willing to pay?"

Without money their own revolutionaries will be revolting against them. After all,the only reason they are there to start with is they have been promised all that "Free stuff".

Nobody will be more devastated than them if they try an embargo against America.