Lawrence O'Donnell: Secret Service could ‘physically remove’ Trump from White House when he loses in

[Cyber Liberty]

I DID NOT ignore yu, but rather said "editorial" alone was not a valid measurement. Somebody else agreedwith my remark, and there it stood.

You must have ignored other posts that did NOT agree with your premise about this being a Never-Trump forum:

http://www.gopbriefingroom.com/index.php/topic,314010.msg1761641.html#msg1761641

[Victoria33]

I'm simply trying to understand what our standards are.  Why, for instance, wasn't this article posted in the Entertainment Section?  It is, after all, a segment from Bill Maher's television show.  Why give such drivel credence and importance by placing it in the Politics NEWS section?

@Right_in_Virginia
@mystery-ak

Perhaps, after all this time you have been here, you don't understand who to contact if you have a problem with the rules/decisions made for location of threads.  At the top under your name, click on @mystery-ak (or click this one I just posted), as she is the owner and can answer your questions.

[ABX]

Sigh.. back to the topic of the original post... it is kind of funny how the story stays the same, just the players change every few  years or so... I recall similar stories about Obama and Bush, both of the opposite sides had people making similar speculation. Never happens. Always a peaceful transition.

[Sanguine]

Sigh.. back to the topic of the original post... it is kind of funny how the story stays the same, just the players change every few  years or so... I recall similar stories about Obama and Bush, both of the opposite sides had people making similar speculation. Never happens. Always a peaceful transition.

Yes, I remember those "0bama will never voluntarily leave the White House" stories. 

[Wingnut]

Yes, I remember those "0bama will never voluntarily leave the White House" stories.

The closest we ever came to that was with Clintons.
They had to sue them to get back what they stole when they were evicted. 

[Cyber Liberty]

@Right_in_Virginia
@mystery-ak

Perhaps, after all this time you have been here, you don't understand who to contact if you have a problem with the rules/decisions made for location of threads.  At the top under your name, click on @mystery-ak (or click this one I just posted), as she is the owner and can answer your questions.

If I have to hazard a guess, I think this goes into this Category because the line between Maher and the other so-called comedians and "news journalists" has been blurred considerably over the years.  Both groups consider themselves to be Social Justice  Warriors, fighting for the cause of destroying Capitalism.

[Cyber Liberty]

Sigh.. back to the topic of the original post... it is kind of funny how the story stays the same, just the players change every few  years or so... I recall similar stories about Obama and Bush, both of the opposite sides had people making similar speculation. Never happens. Always a peaceful transition.

Those peaceful transitions will be a thing of the past the moment an ex-President goes to jail.  A truly criminal President will refuse to leave office if he/she thinks there is a pair of handcuffs waiting, rather than a life of luxury.

[ABX]

Those peaceful transitions will be a thing of the past the moment an ex-President goes to jail.  A truly criminal President will refuse to leave office if he/she thinks there is a pair of handcuffs waiting, rather than a life of luxury.

There really isn't precedent for that though. Constitutionally, the most that can happen is impeachment with removal from office. Only then would he then face some sort of criminal prosecution.

[Right_in_Virginia]

@Right_in_Virginia
@mystery-ak

Perhaps, after all this time you have been here, you don't understand who to contact if you have a problem with the rules/decisions made for location of threads.  At the top under your name, click on @mystery-ak (or click this one I just posted), as she is the owner and can answer your questions.

Are you telling me @Victoria33 that I've no right to communicate directly with my fellow Briefers?    Quite a suppression of free speech and exchange of opinion you've got going here.   

Why don't you take a crack at answering my original question?

[Wingnut]

If I were a betting person, I would lay money that  both
@Victoria33   and  @Right_in_Virginia
are a major pain in @mystery-ak ass.

[Right_in_Virginia]

If I where a betting person, I would lay money that
@Victoria33   and  @Right_in_Virginia
are a major pain in @mystery-ak ass.

Well, thank the Lord you're not @The Ghost 

Besides, no one should take @Victoria33 personally, she cc's Myst on all her posts.   

[Mod5]

Let's get back on topic.

[Cyber Liberty]

There really isn't precedent for that though. Constitutionally, the most that can happen is impeachment with removal from office. Only then would he then face some sort of criminal prosecution.

After January 20, when a President leaves office, there is no such immunity granted.

[Cyber Liberty]

Off-topic comment deleted by Mod.

[Cyber Liberty]

Let's get back on topic.

Ooops!  Sorry....

[Victoria33]

Are you telling me @Victoria33 that I've no right to communicate directly with my fellow Briefers?    Quite a suppression of free speech and exchange of opinion you've got going here.   
Why don't you take a crack at answering my original question?

You can write what your want as you always have, however, no one here can answer your question with authority; @mystery-ak can.  It is your choice to waste time writing about it instead of contacting myst.  She is the owner, not you.

[Right_in_Virginia]

You can write what your want as you always have, however, no one here can answer your question with authority; @mystery-ak can.  It is your choice to waste time writing about it instead of contacting myst.  She is the owner, not you.

Hey @Mod5 .... over here!

[Victoria33]

Well, thank the Lord you're not @The Ghost 
Besides, no one should take @Victoria33 personally, she cc's Myst on all her posts.   

I include her if she started the thread and others if I know she is interested in that subject.

[Victoria33]

If I were a betting person, I would lay money that  both
@Victoria33   and  @Right_in_Virginia
are a major pain in @mystery-ak ass.

@The Ghost

You are incorrect. I seldom respond to RIV as I have her on Ignore.

[mystery-ak]

I posted this in Political because O'Donnell was discussing a way of removing Trump from office...the venue he choose to spew his thoughts makes no difference..it is a political discussion.

edited to add...I'll post an article where ever I want...

[Victoria33]

Yes, I remember those "0bama will never voluntarily leave the White House" stories.

@Sanguine

I remember that, too, and he was gracious, I watched the contacts he had with Trump.  George Bush was also gracious and others before him. 

[Sanguine]

@Sanguine

I remember that, too, and he was gracious, I watched the contacts he had with Trump.  George Bush was also gracious and others before him.

He was gracious, I'll give him that.  However, we have to stop with the gracious descriptor if we go back to Clinton.  I can't imagine a more infantile and obnoxious exit than theirs.

[Right_in_Virginia]

@The Ghost

You are incorrect. I seldom respond to RIV as I have her on Ignore.

Please increase the seldom to never @Victoria33    Thanks.   

[XenaLee]

Well, I'll give you this:  Your reply is certainly hard to argue with.   

Lol!   Let's put it this way.....

you can't deny that you have, in the past, been one that censored content here, whenever you had the power to do so.

The fact that right here in this thread... you called this article drivel... indicating that you would  probably censor this one as well....  IF you had the power to do so.... basically just proves the point.

Instead of just passing up certain threads, you (and others here) feel a need to comment on the thread being "drivel" or whatever other slur you find appropriate.  I've seen you denigrate the person posting the thread, including Myst herself.... for merely having posted it.

That kind of mentality is something I take issue with.  Just so you know.

@Right_in_Virginia

[Cyber Liberty]

He was gracious, I'll give him that.  However, we have to stop with the gracious descriptor if we go back to Clinton.  I can't imagine a more infantile and obnoxious exit than theirs.

I'll never forget the thousands it cost to repair the vandalism done by the outgoing Clinton punks.