Good article - So what is Q and why is MSM suddenly targeting it

[Quix]

Be careful what you wish for.

I don't get your meaning applied to those paragraphs.

[roamer_1]

I don't get your meaning applied to those paragraphs.

The Bible Code is not kind to Tump.

[Quix]

 Stupid idea, whoever thought of that invisible pill - that is the reason you have it - it is invisible as your other ideas are.  Q is certainly someone, so there is that reality.

I'm fairly skeptical that we could currently agree on a lot of the details about reality. However, your assertion above about the reason I value the metaphor about the red  pill is wrong. I value it because it is a useful metaphor. Not because it is invisible. Not that I expect you to believe a thing I say or write.

Your ideas are just ideas and you have Q to give you more ideas to play with.  You like ideas that can't be proved because it is easier to build fantasy than reality.  You can stay in your fantasy every day building on them while other people must live in reality.  You have no reality to show them so don't expect them to give up their reality to embrace fantasy. 

Wrong again. I'm grounded in tangible reality in a list of ways. Even the intangible constructs I spend a lot of time on have tangible connections, in my constructions on them. Again, you will believe what you will about me as well as anything else.

"Besides I prefer variety."
No, you do not; you want sheep following you, believing what you believe or they get the red pill.  You will keep on telling them to believe until they drop, just as you do writing these posts. 

I thought you understood me far better than that. You will discover otherwise eventually. Until then, enjoy your fantasies about me.

Here is the crux of your endeavors: You will never stop until all people praise/love you.  That is it, Quix, you need the approval.  RAD

Approval is an interesting issue. Certainly RAD is a factor in approval needs. However, I've mostly done without it. I have a list of closer loved ones around the world who give me lots of approval in our routine communications. And I have several friends who give me so much approval I sometimes have to ask them pointed questions just to be sure we are on the same tangible page. LOL.

Besides, approval like most relational things is VERY fickle and temporary in the best of times--at least with most people. That's just life.

I'm at peace with that.

Sure, I like approval. But it's not the end all or be all. And, it can be exceedingly suspect until the relationship and other person are proven over time.

Approval on the net has to be among the most fickle and temporary.

And what exactly are people approving?

That one is a decent human being?
That one is interesting?
That one is loving?
That one is smart?
That one is creative?
That one is kind?
That one is generous?
That one is thoughtful?
That one is intense?
That one is persistent?
. . .
. . .

I've long known those things about me. Besides my own knowing myself out of my dialogues with God, closer loved ones and even many strangers have emphasized those qualities for decades.


Worth comes only from God. Any lesser approval is not going to add much to one's sense of worth.


[/quote][/font][/size][/color]

I will leave you to your writings now and wish you well.

I wish you well, too.

[roamer_1]

@Quix  said:

It's been  months since I've checked in on  it.

How long was the code character sequence?

Dude, you edited my post again... I fixed it and brought your words here...

Look into it, and look deep, because the usual suspects are favoring Tump, and omitting the things that will put him in a bad  light.

It DOES anoint him Cyrus (and they will tell you that)
It also anoints him Apollo. and no one says a peep.

It also says he will be assassinated, in a cluster with the name of the assassin, and 666

Another cluster says he will commit sin associated with a group of 10 (Atlantis, 10 kings?), again with a cross of 666.

All part of the Isaiah cluster IIRC... though the usual scholars omit it... But there it is.

[Quix]

@Quix  said:
Dude, you edited my post again... I fixed it and brought your words here...

Look into it, and look deep, because the usual suspects are favoring Tump, and omitting the things that will put him in a bad  light.

It DOES anoint him Cyrus (and they will tell you that)
It also anoints him Apollo. and no one says a peep.

It also says he will be assassinated, in a cluster with the name of the assassin, and 666

Another cluster says he will commit sin associated with a group of 10 (Atlantis, 10 kings?), again with a cross of 666.

All part of the Isaiah cluster IIRC... though the usual scholars omit it... But there it is.

Sorry I goofed.

The critical issue to start with is how long are the code strings. I don't put much stock in them until they are up around 80 characters or longer. And even then--it is hard to know what a given code is . . . i.e.

What perspective is it from?
God's?
Satan's?
A people's belief system? 
etc. etc.

Sounds like that collection of stuff is a real hodge podge.

Thanks anyway.

[roamer_1]

Sorry I goofed.

The critical issue to start with is how long are the code strings. I don't put much stock in them until they are up around 80 characters or longer. And even then--it is hard to know what a given code is . . . i.e.

What perspective is it from?
God's?
Satan's?
A people's belief system? 
etc. etc.

Sounds like that collection of stuff is a real hodge podge.

Thanks anyway.

None so blind...

[Quix]

None so blind...

Uhhhhh . . . that assertion can easily slice both  ways.

IIRC you have not provided a link to the codes involved in your assertions.

You have not posted the codes.
You have not posted the methodology of arriving at the codes.
You have not provided the length of the code strings in characters.
You have not provided any assertions or evidence as to what perspective said codes are considered to be written from.
You have not provided any assertions or evidence about the code researchers qualifications and track record.
You have not provided any assertions or evidence about the purported quality of the software used.
You have not provided any assertions about the mathematical underpinning of the code sofware.

"None are so blind as those" for whom the evidence has been withheld.

[Silver Pines]

@Quix

When someone says they want to "red-pill" me, do you know what my response is going to be?  Or what the response of most people will be?

Why do Q believers have to even use that term instead of just saying they want to convince/persuade people?  It's for the same reason they go around spouting slogans like "where we go one, we go all" or whatever it is.  It's a secret handshake, a roleplay game.  They feel they belong to something bigger than themselves.

"That one is a decent human being?
That one is interesting?
That one is loving?
That one is smart?
That one is creative?
That one is kind?
That one is generous?
That one is thoughtful?
That one is intense?
That one is persistent?
. . .
. . .

I've long known those things about me. Besides my own knowing myself out of my dialogues with God, closer loved ones and even many strangers have emphasized those qualities for decades. "

Wow, well...your self-esteem is definitely strong.

[roamer_1]

Uhhhhh . . . that assertion can easily slice both  ways.

IIRC you have not provided a link to the codes involved in your assertions.

Yep, you are right. Mentioned only in passing, as you were defending Bible Code. I don't ride Bible Code. I don't have links at hand, nor do I care enough about it to go find em for you. It's there alright, and you know right where to look. That's not the point.

What makes one blind is summarily dismissing things without consideration, because they don't fit your paradigm... You know... What you've been generally accusing all of us of doing...

Nevermind. You go your way... I'll see you when the dust settles.

[Quix]

@Quix

When someone says they want to "red-pill" me, do you know what my response is going to be?  Or what the response of most people will be?

Why do Q believers have to even use that term instead of just saying they want to convince/persuade people?  It's for the same reason they go around spouting slogans like "where we go one, we go all" or whatever it is.  It's a secret handshake, a roleplay game.  They feel they belong to something bigger than themselves.

"That one is a decent human being?
That one is interesting?
That one is loving?
That one is smart?
That one is creative?
That one is kind?
That one is generous?
That one is thoughtful?
That one is intense?
That one is persistent?
. . .
. . .

I've long known those things about me. Besides my own knowing myself out of my dialogues with God, closer loved ones and even many strangers have emphasized those qualities for decades. "

Wow, well...your self-esteem is definitely strong.

That would depend on how much of that knowledge is head knowledge and how much heart knowledge. Mine is a mixture . . . sometimes a disappointing mixture.

However, I expected someone to make that kind of comment. That kind of post kind of begs for it.

[Quix]

Yep, you are right. Mentioned only in passing, as you were defending Bible Code. I don't ride Bible Code. I don't have links at hand, nor do I care enough about it to go find em for you. It's there alright, and you know right where to look. That's not the point.

What makes one blind is summarily dismissing things without consideration, because they don't fit your paradigm... You know... What you've been generally accusing all of us of doing...

Nevermind. You go your way... I'll see you when the dust settles.

I rarely if ever dismiss things without consideration. I tend to consider dozens of options in the privacy of my own thinking and prayers. There is rarely a new topic or even an aspect that I haven't considered somewhat. Your thinking I have not considered something before being quite skeptical or dismissive may be quite askew from the facts.

And, I don't recall asserting that y'all dismissed things without considering them. I tend to assume that you have considered them to some degree. I may think that you have considered them too little or without sufficient amounts of the whole picture but that's a different issue.

[Silver Pines]

@Quix

That would depend on how much of that knowledge is head knowledge and how much heart knowledge. Mine is a mixture . . . sometimes a disappointing mixture.

However, I expected someone to make that kind of comment. That kind of post kind of begs for it.

Sort of.  I see that your IQ is *only* 160.  That’s nice for you.

So when is Trump supposed to publicly unveil Q?  Can you give a timeframe?

[Quix]

@Quix

Sort of.  I see that your IQ is *only* 160.  That’s nice for you.

So when is Trump supposed to publicly unveil Q?  Can you give a timeframe?

Out of my RAD insecurities, I've groveled most of my life; considered myself less than most folks etc. etc. etc. Even with my PhD, I still thought of myself mostly as a Southwestern farm hick from  poor white trash background. Whenever someone had a criticism, I took it to heart and tried to redouble my efforts to be better very earnestly.

Lots of people along the way affirmed the better qualities God was building within me--but I tended to pass such comments off as over-blown or insincere etc. Some would kind of grab me and shake me and try and insist that I accept that I was an above average decent bloke but it has been a hard thing to do very fully or sincerely.

The last decade or two, I've made more progress with a more accurate understanding of what God has done within me--realizing always very keenly that I'm still a wet-behind-the-ears snotty nosed brat in an annoying number of ways. Yet, I can see, with some objectivity that list of qualities that so many have commented about over the years. And I'm sure thankful to God that I'm more in those directions than I was when I started out--by a good margin. Have always had a tender heart and cared for others but such was often expressed in problematic ways.

= = =

In terms of timeline for Q-Anon: I don't even  know  prophetic  people who have that down well at all. I figure some significantly more dramatic things will be disclosed within 30 days or so of mid-terms and probably incrementally escalating between now and then.

I'm skeptical that Q-anon will be revealed before some years are past and the vast bulk of the horrendously huge & awful project is over the hump toward being accomplished. There's a lot more usefulness in the team remaining anonymous.

just my humble opinions.

Thanks for the honor of your question.

[Quix]

@Quix

Sort of.  I see that your IQ is *only* 160.  That’s nice for you.

So when is Trump supposed to publicly unveil Q?  Can you give a timeframe?

As you may know, High IQ folks can get in bigger messes than low IQ folks--particularly if they erroneously think that they are smart about everything--which  too many seem to think.

In my case, too often, it has "merely" meant that the messes I got myself in were more  complicated than  the messes of other people.

However, I praise God for His gifts in such regard. It has meant that it is  difficult for me to be bored. I can at least think of many interesting and complex things  in my mind. And, usually, e.g. as in a brainstorming session--when others in the group struggle to come up with 3-4 items, I usually can list 12 or so fairly quickly. That can be fun.

[Idiot]

As you may know, High IQ folks can get in bigger messes than low IQ folks--particularly if they erroneously think that they are smart about everything--which  too many seem to think.

In my case, too often, it has "merely" meant that the messes I got myself in were more  complicated than  the messes of other people.

However, I praise God for His gifts in such regard. It has meant that it is  difficult for me to be bored. I can at least think of many interesting and complex things  in my mind. And, usually, e.g. as in a brainstorming session--when others in the group struggle to come up with 3-4 items, I usually can list 12 or so fairly quickly. That can be fun.

Gotta watch out for the brilliant folks...lol.  I have a cousin who was brilliant...was in the upper crust of Mensa...whatever the name of that is.  The guy ended up being a librarian and a hoarder.  When it rained, he sat in his den with an umbrella, so he could watch tv and not get wet, because he was too cheap to fix the roof.  He was brilliant, but didn't have the sense to come out of the rain.  Actually a nice guy though...

[Quix]

Gotta watch out for the brilliant folks...lol.  I have a cousin who was brilliant...was in the upper crust of Mensa...whatever the name of that is.  The guy ended up being a librarian and a hoarder.  When it rained, he sat in his den with an umbrella, so he could watch tv and not get wet, because he was too cheap to fix the roof.  He was brilliant, but didn't have the sense to come out of the rain.  Actually a nice guy though...

Indeed.

Thankfully, I still know enough common sense to come in out of the rain--though I may enjoy walking in it on occasion.

I am a bit behind in sorting and tossing but I don't have any trouble letting go of carp and junk. As long as I can make it enough of a priority to bother with. BTW, is unopened Miracle Whip 3 years old still any good? LOL.