Author Topic: Trump White House Has Smaller Staff, Spends Less on Salaries Than Obama White House  (Read 898 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline SirLinksALot

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,417
  • Gender: Male
SOURCE: TENNESSEE STAR

URL: https://tennesseestar.com/2018/07/09/trump-white-house-has-smaller-staff-spends-less-on-salaries-than-obama-white-house/

by Jeremiah Poff



Over $20 million in taxpayer funds could be saved at the end of President Donald Trump’s first term in office due to his leaner White House operation.

A new report on the White House Office Personnel revealed that Trump has a significantly smaller staff than his predecessor did at this time, according to an analysis by Open the Books, a government watchdog organization that focuses on spending.

“Although the White House personnel budget is an infinitesimal part of the $3.9 trillion federal budget, it is an important forecasting indicator showing Trump’s deep commitment to cut the size, scope and power of the federal government and reign in waste,” wrote Adam Andrzejewski, CEO of Open the Books, in an op-ed for Forbes.

As of June 30, 2018, the White House currently employs 374 people, three fewer than were employed in 2017. It’s also significantly lower than the 469 that were employed in 2010 by then President Barack Obama.

In addition to maintaining a smaller staff size, Trump’s White House has also cut payroll by over $5 million when compared to Obama’s 2015 staff. The 2018 payroll currently sits at $35.2 million, in contrast to the 2015 payroll which Open the Books reported exceeded $40.9 million.

Open the Books also noted that by maintaining a smaller staff and by refusing to take a salary, Trump has already saved $11 million in taxpayer dollars, and “four-year savings could easily top $22 million.”

(EXCERPT) CLICK ABOVE LINK FOR THE REST...

Offline XenaLee

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15,398
  • Gender: Female
  • Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum
SOURCE: TENNESSEE STAR

URL: https://tennesseestar.com/2018/07/09/trump-white-house-has-smaller-staff-spends-less-on-salaries-than-obama-white-house/

by Jeremiah Poff



Over $20 million in taxpayer funds could be saved at the end of President Donald Trump’s first term in office due to his leaner White House operation.

A new report on the White House Office Personnel revealed that Trump has a significantly smaller staff than his predecessor did at this time, according to an analysis by Open the Books, a government watchdog organization that focuses on spending.

“Although the White House personnel budget is an infinitesimal part of the $3.9 trillion federal budget, it is an important forecasting indicator showing Trump’s deep commitment to cut the size, scope and power of the federal government and reign in waste,” wrote Adam Andrzejewski, CEO of Open the Books, in an op-ed for Forbes.

As of June 30, 2018, the White House currently employs 374 people, three fewer than were employed in 2017. It’s also significantly lower than the 469 that were employed in 2010 by then President Barack Obama.

In addition to maintaining a smaller staff size, Trump’s White House has also cut payroll by over $5 million when compared to Obama’s 2015 staff. The 2018 payroll currently sits at $35.2 million, in contrast to the 2015 payroll which Open the Books reported exceeded $40.9 million.

Open the Books also noted that by maintaining a smaller staff and by refusing to take a salary, Trump has already saved $11 million in taxpayer dollars, and “four-year savings could easily top $22 million.”

(EXCERPT) CLICK ABOVE LINK FOR THE REST...


And.... every little bit helps.   I guarantee you that you'll never see a damned Democrat donating their salary or even thinking about, much less trying, to save the taxpayers $$$.
No quarter given to the enemy within...ever.

You can vote your way into socialism, but you have to shoot your way out of it.

Offline edpc

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14,879
  • Gender: Male
  • Professional Misanthrope - Briefer and Boxer
And.... every little bit helps.   I guarantee you that you'll never see a damned Democrat donating their salary or even thinking about, much less trying, to save the taxpayers $$$.


According to this, two other previous presidents donated their salary – Hoover and Kennedy.

https://ijr.com/2016/11/735046-trump-will-become-third-president-to-forego-a-salary-heres-what-the-other-two-did-with-theirs/
I disagree.  Circle gets the square.

Offline XenaLee

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15,398
  • Gender: Female
  • Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum

According to this, two other previous presidents donated their salary – Hoover and Kennedy.

https://ijr.com/2016/11/735046-trump-will-become-third-president-to-forego-a-salary-heres-what-the-other-two-did-with-theirs/

Well kiss my grits & call me Dumbstruck!   I guess that was a bit before my time...lolol.

I stand corrected. (thanks)

So there was ONE Democrat that did the same (Hoover wasn't a rat).
« Last Edit: July 12, 2018, 05:32:11 pm by XenaLee »
No quarter given to the enemy within...ever.

You can vote your way into socialism, but you have to shoot your way out of it.

Offline Frank Cannon

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26,097
  • Gender: Male

According to this, two other previous presidents donated their salary – Hoover and Kennedy.

https://ijr.com/2016/11/735046-trump-will-become-third-president-to-forego-a-salary-heres-what-the-other-two-did-with-theirs/

Hoover was a Republican and Kennedy reneged on donating his salary after '63.

Offline GrouchoTex

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7,387
  • Gender: Male
Didn't Obama have some ridiculous amount of "czars", something like 37 of them?

Offline XenaLee

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15,398
  • Gender: Female
  • Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum
Hoover was a Republican and Kennedy reneged on donating his salary after '63.

Ah ha!  So the truth comes out.  Thanks, Frank!
No quarter given to the enemy within...ever.

You can vote your way into socialism, but you have to shoot your way out of it.

Offline XenaLee

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15,398
  • Gender: Female
  • Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum
Didn't Obama have some ridiculous amount of "czars", something like 37 of them?

Yes... he did.  That was his end-run around any confirmation/approval process.  Van Johnson was, I believe, the most controversial of his czars.
No quarter given to the enemy within...ever.

You can vote your way into socialism, but you have to shoot your way out of it.

Offline GrouchoTex

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7,387
  • Gender: Male
Yes... he did.  That was his end-run around any confirmation/approval process.  Van Johnson was, I believe, the most controversial of his czars.

Yep, that's why he did it, to escape congressional scrutiny through a nominating process.

Offline thackney

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,267
  • Gender: Male
Didn't Obama have some ridiculous amount of "czars", something like 37 of them?

This started with Franklin Roosevelt, nearly all appointing a handful this way.  It blew up with George W. Bush appointing 28 outside congressional approval.  Barack Obama took that to 39.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._executive_branch_czars

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2014/jun/25/chain-email/obama-appointed-45-czars-replace-elected-officials/
Life is fragile, handle with prayer

Offline SirLinksALot

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,417
  • Gender: Male
Ok, how does one respond to this liberal accusation;

Trump, after criticizing Obama for playing too much golf, has actually played more rounds than Obama at this point of his presidency to Mar-a-Lago and Bedminster, New Jersey. This has cost taxpayers millions in Presidential security expenses.

Also, how true is it that Trump's travel expenses far exceeds those of Obama's at this point of their presidency?
« Last Edit: July 13, 2018, 02:01:02 pm by SirLinksALot »