The "right to abort" was an invention of the courts. OF COURSE it's an example of judicial tyranny ... as was common with so many rulings in that era ... after two centuries of allowing states to regulate such matters. Due process clause? Yeah, try & imagine how that interpretation would have been received in 1868.
But what it boils down to is ... sure, a textualist would vote to overturn Roe. John Roberts would not, so until a progressive retires, this should not be used to disqualify a nominee.