Author Topic: Supreme Court rules for crisis pregnancy centers in free speech dispute  (Read 925 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Millee

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,081
  • Gender: Female
The Supreme Court rules Tuesday in favor of pro-life groups that counsel pregnant women to make choices other than abortion, invalidating a California law requiring them to prominently post information on how to obtain a state-funded abortion.

The court, in a 5-4 ruling, said the state law probably violates the Constitution. The court also cast doubts on similar laws in Hawaii and Illinois.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/06/26/supreme-court-rules-for-crisis-pregnancy-centers-in-free-speech-dispute.html

Online Bigun

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51,851
  • Gender: Male
  • Resistance to Tyrants is Obedience to God
    • The FairTax Plan
The Supreme Court rules Tuesday in favor of pro-life groups that counsel pregnant women to make choices other than abortion, invalidating a California law requiring them to prominently post information on how to obtain a state-funded abortion.

The court, in a 5-4 ruling, said the state law probably violates the Constitution. The court also cast doubts on similar laws in Hawaii and Illinois.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/06/26/supreme-court-rules-for-crisis-pregnancy-centers-in-free-speech-dispute.html

YEA! Yea!  And YEA!
"I wish it need not have happened in my time," said Frodo.

"So do I," said Gandalf, "and so do all who live to see such times. But that is not for them to decide. All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given us."
- J. R. R. Tolkien

Offline XenaLee

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15,398
  • Gender: Female
  • Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum
The Supreme Court rules Tuesday in favor of pro-life groups that counsel pregnant women to make choices other than abortion, invalidating a California law requiring them to prominently post information on how to obtain a state-funded abortion.

The court, in a 5-4 ruling, said the state law probably violates the Constitution. The court also cast doubts on similar laws in Hawaii and Illinois.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/06/26/supreme-court-rules-for-crisis-pregnancy-centers-in-free-speech-dispute.html

A "a state-funded abortion"?   That means a taxpayer-funded abortion.  Typical of the fascists in California to force honest, hard-working taxpayers to pay for this.  They have lost their souls.
No quarter given to the enemy within...ever.

You can vote your way into socialism, but you have to shoot your way out of it.

Offline Millee

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,081
  • Gender: Female
YEA! Yea!  And YEA!

Tired of winning yet, @Bigun ??   :cool:

Offline SirLinksALot

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,417
  • Gender: Male
Just Imagine the $#!+show that SCOTUS would be inflicting on us if Merrick Garland had been confirmed to The SCOTUS.

Should anyone else listen to George Will's recommendations?

Offline Jazzhead

  • Blue lives matter
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11,593
  • Gender: Male
The decision is, of course, correct, but what's sad is that it's the same tired old 5-4 majority.   There was a time, well within my lifetime, when liberals stood up for and supported free speech and freedom of conscience.   No more.    **nononono*
It's crackers to slip a rozzer the dropsy in snide

Offline edpc

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14,879
  • Gender: Male
  • Professional Misanthrope - Briefer and Boxer
Just Imagine the $#!+show that SCOTUS would be inflicting on us if Merrick Garland had been confirmed to The SCOTUS.

Should anyone else listen to George Will's recommendations?


I don’t know.  Should we listen to Mitch McConnell?  He’s the reason why Garland is not on the Supreme Court.  I don’t trust McConnell, either.
I disagree.  Circle gets the square.

Offline Jazzhead

  • Blue lives matter
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11,593
  • Gender: Male

I don’t know.  Should we listen to Mitch McConnell?  He’s the reason why Garland is not on the Supreme Court.  I don’t trust McConnell, either.

McConnell is the ONLY reason Garland is not on the Supreme Court right now.   He deserves, IMO, a helluva lot more appreciation from conservatives than he tends to get.   
It's crackers to slip a rozzer the dropsy in snide

Offline dfwgator

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17,503
The decision is, of course, correct, but what's sad is that it's the same tired old 5-4 majority.   There was a time, well within my lifetime, when liberals stood up for and supported free speech and freedom of conscience.   No more.    **nononono*

You do realize that the Communists stole the term "liberal",    I still think of myself of a "classical liberal",  but that word has been hijacked.

Offline TomSea

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 40,432
  • Gender: Male
  • All deserve a trial if accused
Good for the Supreme Court.

Some say, only stop abortion through persuading others, guess what? Some in this country want to shut down free speech. That argument goes to hell in a handbag.

Those crisis centers probably do actually help a lot of people. There use to be one I'd see in the next town over. It was in like a former restaurant near a Planned Parenthood clinic.
« Last Edit: June 26, 2018, 05:35:24 pm by TomSea »

Online Hoodat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 37,123
Another link:

https://www.christianpost.com/news/california-cannot-force-pro-life-centers-advertise-abortion-services-supreme-court-rules-nifla-becerra-225390/

The Decision

Sadly, it was a 5-4 decision, meaning that there are four justices on the Supreme Court who hold the First Amendment in contempt.
If a political party does not have its foundation in the determination to advance a cause that is right and that is moral, then it is not a political party; it is merely a conspiracy to seize power.     -Dwight Eisenhower-

"The [U.S.] Constitution is a limitation on the government, not on private individuals ... it does not prescribe the conduct of private individuals, only the conduct of the government ... it is not a charter for government power, but a charter of the citizen's protection against the government."     -Ayn Rand-

Offline Jazzhead

  • Blue lives matter
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11,593
  • Gender: Male
Good for the Supreme Court.

Some say, only stop abortion through persuading others, guess what? Some in this country want to shut down free speech. That argument goes to hell in a handbag.

Those crisis centers probably do actually help a lot of people. There use to be one I'd see in the next town over. It was in like a former restaurant near a Planned Parenthood clinic.

Yes, indeed.   Crisis pregnancy centers are a key component of effective persuasion.   Like I said,  the SCOTUS has made the right decision, but it is infuriating that the four "liberals" think so little of free speech and freedom of conscience. 

There aren't many issues that unite the gamut of conservatives today, but opposition to the sort of ideologically-driven "judging" practiced by the likes of the Four Stooges is one of them. 
It's crackers to slip a rozzer the dropsy in snide

Offline Jazzhead

  • Blue lives matter
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11,593
  • Gender: Male
You do realize that the Communists stole the term "liberal",    I still think of myself of a "classical liberal",  but that word has been hijacked.

Yes, I realize that.  In my post immediately above, I placed the term in quotation marks in recognition that the liberal tradition has been hijacked by, well, let's not mince words shall we, a leftist variant of fascism.   
It's crackers to slip a rozzer the dropsy in snide

Online DB

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13,555
A "a state-funded abortion"?   That means a taxpayer-funded abortion.  Typical of the fascists in California to force honest, hard-working taxpayers to pay for this.  They have lost their souls.

California advertises within the state on how to get subsidized healthcare benefits... It infuriated me every time I saw it...

I've moved my business and I out of the state this year. The last thing to do is get my property there sold.

Online Hoodat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 37,123
Breyer's dissent is disgusting.  The argument he offers is the same one offered against Brown v. Board of Education.  Breyer is saying that if we apply First Amendment protection in this case, then we will have to apply it in all cases of government-mandated disclosure.  And that simply won't do under a fascist system of government.
If a political party does not have its foundation in the determination to advance a cause that is right and that is moral, then it is not a political party; it is merely a conspiracy to seize power.     -Dwight Eisenhower-

"The [U.S.] Constitution is a limitation on the government, not on private individuals ... it does not prescribe the conduct of private individuals, only the conduct of the government ... it is not a charter for government power, but a charter of the citizen's protection against the government."     -Ayn Rand-

Online Hoodat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 37,123
A "a state-funded abortion"?   That means a taxpayer-funded abortion.  Typical of the fascists in California to force honest, hard-working taxpayers to pay for this.  They have lost their souls.

Our federal government does the same.  How many Planned Parenthood abortions do you think are made possible with $500 million in government funding?
If a political party does not have its foundation in the determination to advance a cause that is right and that is moral, then it is not a political party; it is merely a conspiracy to seize power.     -Dwight Eisenhower-

"The [U.S.] Constitution is a limitation on the government, not on private individuals ... it does not prescribe the conduct of private individuals, only the conduct of the government ... it is not a charter for government power, but a charter of the citizen's protection against the government."     -Ayn Rand-

Online Hoodat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 37,123
There was a time, well within my lifetime, when liberals stood up for and supported free speech and freedom of conscience.

When was that?  It's been 38 years since liberals turned off Ronald Reagan's microphones.
If a political party does not have its foundation in the determination to advance a cause that is right and that is moral, then it is not a political party; it is merely a conspiracy to seize power.     -Dwight Eisenhower-

"The [U.S.] Constitution is a limitation on the government, not on private individuals ... it does not prescribe the conduct of private individuals, only the conduct of the government ... it is not a charter for government power, but a charter of the citizen's protection against the government."     -Ayn Rand-