No we're talking about people who enter this country illegally.
let's be truthful here. And they do NOT have due process rights.....
I hate to disagree with you, but in this case they do. For two reasons (outside the fact that this has been ruled on by the Supreme Court in Rasul vs. Bush (No. 03-334) & Al Odah v. United States (No. 03-343))
First is the fundamental principle. The Constitutional principle that 'no person be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law' is a restriction on the government, not on the person. As Thomas Jefferson stated, our rights are inherent, they are not granted to us by the government. The government is restricted on infringing on those inherent rights. Anyone within the jurisdictional boundaries of the US is protected from government interventionism of those rights.
Secondly and just as important, and something I pointed out upthread, one of the most important aspects of protecting due process isn't to protect illegals but to protect US Citizens who get caught up in the process. Even with the current due process procedures in place, in the past decade, over 20 thousand US citizens have been deported incorrectly. Take out due process from the equation, where anyone can just be picked up and with just the opinion of ICE (or however that process goes) and with no due process, tossed over the border, that twenty thousand US Citizen error is likely to grow exponentially.
Finally, even with all the problems with illegal immigration, do we really want that kind of power in the hands of a centralized government where, with no recourse or oversight, they can strip anyone they choose of due process without even taking the simple determination to see if they are a citizen, and eject them from the country. Think about the slippery slope argument. It may get some cheers and 'ra ra' from people now when they think of illegal immigrants, but what would/could be the consequence of such power in the hands of someone who has less than stellar motivations. What would a Soros minded ruler do with such power? What would a Pelosi do with it?
Is that a liberty you are willing to sacrifice for what you believe is a bit of security?