No its the lawyers and activist judges who are making a joke of our legal system
When free men cannot know whether they are within the law until an exclusive caste divines its meaning, and that exclusive caste routinely divines that meaning to be counter-intuitive to the thinking of intelligent citizens, consent of the governed is forfeit. It is precisely the legal profession that has brought itself, and law in general, into disrepute. Unfortunately "contempt of court" has become a routine state of citizenship.
That decisions are rendered on a narrow basis is generally good I think, but when a court pointedly refuses to decide the critical issues that are actually raised by a case, that court fails to do its job in my opinion. This decision should not give significant optimism to those, like myself, who believe the baker has no obligation to prepare the cake.