Some questions come up for me... what kind of treatment is allowed to be tried? if the answer is anything, then, you leave the desperate patient vulnerable to hoaxes out there ( and potentially beneficial cures as well ).
On the other hand, if the principle is LIBERTY ( i.e., Freedom to live and take risks as you see fit ), then this bill is totally compatible and with the spirit of the constitution.
As for this counter argument in the article: it will leave patients vulnerable to medicines that might not work or even be harmful
Well yes, isn't that the whole point? These patients are gravely ill already so they have nothing to lose, to be blunt, and there's always a chance that one of the experimental medicines WILL work, which would speed up the trial process.