Well, what do you know. The Federal Bureau of Investigation really did task an “informant†to insinuate himself with Trump campaign advisers in 2016. Our Kimberley Strassel reported this two weeks ago without disclosing a name.
We now have all but official confirmation thanks to “current and former government officials†who contributed to apologias last week in the New York Times and Washington Post. And please don’t call the informant a “spy.†A headline on one of the Times’ stories says the “F.B.I. Used Informant to Investigate Russia Ties to Campaign, Not to Spy, as Trump Claims.â€
We’ll let readers parse that casuistic distinction, which is part of a campaign by the FBI and Justice Department to justify their refusal to turn over to the House Intelligence Committee documents related to the informant. Justice and the FBI claim this Capitol Hill oversight would blow the cover of this non-spy and even endanger his life. Yet these same stories have disclosed so many specific details about the informant whom we dare not call a spy that you can discover the name of the likeliest suspect in a single Google search.
Read more at:
https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-fbi-informant-who-wasnt-spying-1526854417
