Sean Hannity Net Worth: Fox News Host Linked To Shell Companies That Bought $90 Million Worth of Pro

[XenaLee]

You must’ve missed the memo in the opening comments.  I posted the thread because I’m the Hannity basher.   

Yeah...but.... Hannity is not the same guy as that same guy you mentioned (which is the guy I was referring to there).  Is he.   

I call your roll and up the ante!   

[Frank Cannon]

Trump picked right up on the refrain soon after.

That's called smart politics. Remember Willie Horton? Bush didn't dig that gem up on his own. It was Algore.

[driftdiver]

While I rarely watch Sean Hannity as I find all the talking head shows to be a waste of time, this thread shows why Conservatives continue to lose ground.   He certainly isn't perfect, nobody is, but he is a strong voice for most conservative causes.   He undermines the globalist and socialist agenda of the left on a daily basis.  For all his faults he is one of the biggest voices keeping the left from completely owning the public narrative.

So here we have so called (or at less self professed) conservatives condemning him because 1) he has investments, 2) some of those investments are in real estate, and 3) the loans for those properties are insured by HUD.   BTW, the lender decides whether they want you to take out this insurance and I'd wager most people on this board have or have had a govt insured mortgage.

Heck one of you even thinks the HUD Secretary personally signed off on these loans.    How effin stupid can a person be?

[edpc]

That's called smart politics. Remember Willie Horton? Bush didn't dig that gem up on his own. It was Algore.

At least he didn’t put Horton in charge of federal prisons after he was elected.

[XenaLee]

Trump picked right up on the refrain soon after.

"I know the guys at Goldman Sachs. They have total, total control over him. Just like they have total control over Hillary Clinton," Trump said of Cruz, whom the real estate mogul also called a "total fraud" and "the biggest liar I've ever seen."

https://www.cnn.com/2016/02/19/politics/donald-trump-ted-cruz-goldman-sachs/index.html

Right.   He saw it published elsewhere and repeated it.  He's known for that.

[Frank Cannon]

Right.   He saw it published elsewhere and repeated it.  He's known for that.

It also didn't help Cruz out that the FEC was looking into those loans at the time.

[edpc]

Right.   He saw it published elsewhere and repeated it.  He's known for that.

Because it was the ‘tree falls on n the woods’ scenario.  Ron was irrelevant in 2016 and his son Rand had just dropped out of the race days before that article.  Nobody heard it.

[XenaLee]

Because it was the ‘tree falls on n the woods’ scenario.  Ron was irrelevant in 2016 and his son Rand had just dropped out of the race days before that article.  Nobody heard it.

That makes total sense.  I bet that pissed him off when Trump got the credit for the slur...lol.

[XenaLee]

It also didn't help Cruz out that the FEC was looking into those loans at the time.

Which was also asinine.  Memory fails.... but wasn't the main loan with GS taken out using his own benefits (401k?)?  It was a secured loan, IOW.  Right?  And for that the SEC was investigating?  Yet another case of Obama using the government against his opponents...since all the lefties in government did his bidding even without him having to ask.

[edpc]

Those neckless figures should off themselves.  They can’t do a damn thing right, anyway.

[truth_seeker]

Meanwhile there's a story about the Obama's Chicago house, being owned by a "Trust"

Any interest in that story, at HBR (Hannity Bashing Room) "conservative hub?"

[driftdiver]

Here are some for leftists and those that support their agenda.

[driftdiver]

Meanwhile there's a story about the Obama's Chicago house, being owned by a "Trust"

Any interest in that story, at HBR (Hannity Bashing Room) "conservative hub?"

@truth_seeker
Its not surprising that the communists will try to make an issue of it.   However, it is disheartening that so called conservatives jump on board.

[ABX]

While I rarely watch Sean Hannity as I find all the talking head shows to be a waste of time, this thread shows why Conservatives continue to lose ground.   He certainly isn't perfect, nobody is, but he is a strong voice for most conservative causes.   He undermines the globalist and socialist agenda of the left on a daily basis.  For all his faults he is one of the biggest voices keeping the left from completely owning the public narrative.

So here we have so called (or at less self professed) conservatives condemning him because 1) he has investments, 2) some of those investments are in real estate, and 3) the loans for those properties are insured by HUD.   BTW, the lender decides whether they want you to take out this insurance and I'd wager most people on this board have or have had a govt insured mortgage.

Heck one of you even thinks the HUD Secretary personally signed off on these loans.    How effin stupid can a person be?

Scrolling through the thread, only one person has gone against Hannity on here, and it was solely for the issue of proper disclosure, none of the things you claim.

[corbe]

@truth_seeker
Its not surprising that the communists will try to make an issue of it.   However, it is disheartening that so called conservatives jump on board.

   Sean would be proud of you Briefers that defend that low life with such passion.

[Frank Cannon]

Meanwhile there's a story about the Obama's Chicago house, being owned by a "Trust"

Any interest in that story, at HBR (Hannity Bashing Room) "conservative hub?"

A "Trust" sounds reliable and friendly. A "Shell Corp" sounds evil and mysterious. Of course no one here cares about that, or the fact that DNC muckity mucks owns his house in Georgetown.

[edpc]

There are people that identify as a Republican who get plenty of well-deserved criticism here, when they say or do something hypocritical.  Three that come to mind are McCain, Graham, and Romney. Someone should really update the list of who we are and aren’t allowed to touch.   

[driftdiver]

   Sean would be proud of you Briefers that defend that low life with such passion.

Defending a lowlife?   I havent tried to defend you so  you'll have to be more clear.

Because you can't mean Hannity, because he's not a lowlife.

[driftdiver]

There are people that identify as a Republican who get plenty of well-deserved criticism here, when they say or do something hypocritical.  Three that come to mind are McCain, Graham, and Romney. Someone should really update the list of who we are and aren’t allowed to touch.   

@edpc
Touch whoever you want.  Just drop the leftist whining when you get feedback for jumping on Hannity for taking out a mortgage or making real estate investments.

[driftdiver]

Scrolling through the thread, only one person has gone against Hannity on here, and it was solely for the issue of proper disclosure, none of the things you claim.

@AbaraXas
Uh huh, the topic of the thread is his real estate investments and HUD insured mortgage.  You wanna try again?

[ABX]

Meanwhile there's a story about the Obama's Chicago house, being owned by a "Trust"

Any interest in that story, at HBR (Hannity Bashing Room) "conservative hub?"

So why didn't you post it?  You seemed far more eager to come here and thumb your nose at other members than to raise flags on that story.

[Frank Cannon]

There are people that identify as a Republican who get plenty of well-deserved criticism here, when they say or do something hypocritical.  Three that come to mind are McCain, Graham, and Romney. Someone should really update the list of who we are and aren’t allowed to touch.   

No body gives a shit whether you like Sean or not. The problem is digging through a mans investments and trying to turn it into a scandal even though it is legal as hell and plenty of people do it.

It's Commie talking point bullshit of the first order, especially when the peanut gallery making an issue of this hasn't said word one about the Podestas funneling Russian money into the US and hiding it in an art collection.

[txradioguy]

Meanwhile there's a story about the Obama's Chicago house, being owned by a "Trust"

Any interest in that story, at HBR (Hannity Bashing Room) "conservative hub?"

I guess I missed you posting the article here on TBR so we could discuss it.

Oh yeah...that's right...

[txradioguy]

Scrolling through the thread, only one person has gone against Hannity on here, and it was solely for the issue of proper disclosure, none of the things you claim.

@AbaraXas at least you can see that.

[driftdiver]

No body gives a shit whether you like Sean or not. The problem is digging through a mans investments and trying to turn it into a scandal even though it is legal as hell and plenty of people do it.

It's Commie talking point bullshit of the first order, especially when the peanut gallery making an issue of this hasn't said word one about the Podestas funneling Russian money into the US and hiding it in an art collection.