Author Topic: Wildlife conservation in North America may not be science-based after all  (Read 320 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

rangerrebew

  • Guest
Wildlife conservation in North America may not be science-based after all
March 07, 2018


By Justin Wong

A study led by recent SFU PhD alumnus Kyle Artelle has unveiled new findings that challenge the widespread assumption that wildlife management in North America is science-based. He conducted the study with SFU researchers John Reynolds and Jessica Walsh, as well as researchers from other institutions.

In the study, published by AAAS Open Access journal Science Advances, the researchers compiled and analyzed all of the publicly available documents describing 667 hunt management systems. These included 27 species groups across 62 U.S. states and Canadian provinces. They also identified four hallmarks that provide rigour to science-based management: clear objectives, use of evidence, transparency and external review.

https://www.sfu.ca/sfunews/stories/2018/03/wildlife-conservation-in-north-america-may-not-be-science-based-after-all.html
 
« Last Edit: March 13, 2018, 03:21:05 pm by rangerrebew »