Author Topic: Grassley immigration bill has TWICE as much foreign aid as border security  (Read 216 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline libertybele

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 58,570
  • Gender: Female
  • WE are NOT ok!
Grassley immigration bill has TWICE as much foreign aid as border security

Congressional Republicans threw fiscal sanity out the window last week, so it comes as no surprise that the immigration bill introduced in the Senate Wednesday comes with an eye-popping price tag of nearly $100 billion. But what may surprise conservatives who believe in President Trump’s America First campaign message is that this bill spends twice as much on foreign aid as it does on border security.

The Trump-endorsed plan proposed by Senator Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, includes $25 billion for a “Border Security Enforcement Fund,” $18 billion of which is appropriated for “tactical infrastructure.” But in a section titled “Foreign Migration Assistance,” there is an additional $50 billion appropriated for the Department of Homeland Security, “with the concurrence of the Secretary of State” to provide “to a foreign government, financial assistance for foreign country operations to address migration flows that may affect the United States.”

The foreign aid in this immigration bill is only to be provided if “such assistance would enhance the recipient government’s capacity to address irregular migration flows that may affect the United States,” but there’s the catch. What exactly does “may affect the United States” mean? That’s up to the determination of the secretaries of homeland security and state, it seems.

President Trump has repeatedly railed against foreign aid, both on the campaign trail and in office. The White House’s 2019 budget proposal features billions of dollars in cuts to foreign aid. But this bill would authorize an increase of aid to countries that have already demonstrated they are unable to stem illegal migration with the funds we already provide to them.

This is just the beginning. Jamie Dupree noticed that the phrase “such sums as may be necessary” appears in four different sections of the bill, which could authorize even more spending.

So what are conservatives getting in exchange for all of this money? Diversity visa lottery visas are relocated to other visa programs, instead of outright repealed. Chain migration is likewise limited to immediate family members (fathers, mothers, siblings, and spouses) but is not repealed. ..........

https://www.conservativereview.com/articles/grassley-immigration-bill-twice-much-foreign-aid-border-security/
« Last Edit: February 15, 2018, 02:52:07 pm by libertybele »
I Believe in the United States of America as a Government of the people, by the people, for the people; whose just powers are derived from the consent of the governed; a democracy in a republic; a sovereign nation of many sovereign states; a perfect union one and inseparable; established upon those principles of freedom, equality, justice and humanity for which American patriots sacrificed their lives and fortunes.  I therefore believe it is my duty to my country to love it; to support its Constitution; to obey its laws to respect its flag; and to defend it against all enemies.