We just agree to disagree as to whether we know enough real evidence right now to find people guilty and to "hang" all the folks from the alphabet agencies. I just don't know how anyone can conclude BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT guilt without first looking at the entire FISA applications (and probably the underlying intelligence as well). I'm just not yet ready to accept as "fact" a partisan memo without the benefit of the equally partisan rebuttal memo and without reviewing what was REALLY in the FISA applications. If you think that makes me unreasonable, well, you're entitled to that opinion I suppose.
@Concerned Nonsense.
We know Hillary had top secret data on her personal server.
We know Huma had top secret data in her yahoo email account and personal laptop.
Those are crimes.
We know comey et al covered up the above and refused to refer for prosecution.
We know at this time the FBI transfered key evidence to the Clinton campaign for destruction , i.e. laptops with classified data.
We also know that during this tim top fbi officials were conspiring against Trump using official resources.
We also know that top FBI and doj officials were knowingly using fabricated data to justify FISA warrants to spy on people in the Trump campaign and later the Trump administration.
We know for a fact high level officials were conspiring to bring down Trump
There's nothing to disagree about. Those are facts.